Making meaning of data

Exploring representations of classroom activities from a first year engineering course

Nikitha Sambamurthy, Catherine G P. Berdanier, Monica Farmer Cox, Miss Jing Lv, Yukiko Maeda, Syafiah Mahfuzah Johari

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Abstract

    Real-time, pedagogical feedback can be useful for instructors and graduate teaching assistants in assessing the effectiveness of their instructional activities. This is especially useful in first-year engineering classes, where laboratory and team activities may be more common. The G-RATE, Global Real-Time Assessment Tool for Teaching Enhancement, is a tool to provide research-based feedback for instructors about their classroom interactions across four areas based on the "How People Learn" framework1: knowledge-centeredness, community centeredness, learner-centeredness, and assessment-centeredness. The G-RATE provides a teaching profile across these categories, as well as a chronological profile of teaching interactions. Given the huge amounts of classroom data captured over large spans of time, the process of effectively representing the depth and breadth of classroom activities becomes messy. How can data be represented in a detailed, meaningful manner that can inform educators' teaching practices? Using data collected among 7 instructors in a first-year engineering course at a large Midwestern university, the authors present an overview of data collection techniques used to inform faculty about their pedagogical instruction. Implications for translating this data into feedback are presented along with sample profiles of faculty instruction using the G-RATE.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publication122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society
    PublisherAmerican Society for Engineering Education
    StatePublished - 2015
    Event2015 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition - Seattle, United States
    Duration: Jun 14 2015Jun 17 2015

    Other

    Other2015 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
    CountryUnited States
    CitySeattle
    Period6/14/156/17/15

    Fingerprint

    Teaching
    Feedback

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Engineering(all)

    Cite this

    Sambamurthy, N., Berdanier, C. G. P., Cox, M. F., Lv, M. J., Maeda, Y., & Johari, S. M. (2015). Making meaning of data: Exploring representations of classroom activities from a first year engineering course. In 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society American Society for Engineering Education.
    Sambamurthy, Nikitha ; Berdanier, Catherine G P. ; Cox, Monica Farmer ; Lv, Miss Jing ; Maeda, Yukiko ; Johari, Syafiah Mahfuzah. / Making meaning of data : Exploring representations of classroom activities from a first year engineering course. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society. American Society for Engineering Education, 2015.
    @inproceedings{206aa66f2bd9411d9b79f8f82554ced0,
    title = "Making meaning of data: Exploring representations of classroom activities from a first year engineering course",
    abstract = "Real-time, pedagogical feedback can be useful for instructors and graduate teaching assistants in assessing the effectiveness of their instructional activities. This is especially useful in first-year engineering classes, where laboratory and team activities may be more common. The G-RATE, Global Real-Time Assessment Tool for Teaching Enhancement, is a tool to provide research-based feedback for instructors about their classroom interactions across four areas based on the {"}How People Learn{"} framework1: knowledge-centeredness, community centeredness, learner-centeredness, and assessment-centeredness. The G-RATE provides a teaching profile across these categories, as well as a chronological profile of teaching interactions. Given the huge amounts of classroom data captured over large spans of time, the process of effectively representing the depth and breadth of classroom activities becomes messy. How can data be represented in a detailed, meaningful manner that can inform educators' teaching practices? Using data collected among 7 instructors in a first-year engineering course at a large Midwestern university, the authors present an overview of data collection techniques used to inform faculty about their pedagogical instruction. Implications for translating this data into feedback are presented along with sample profiles of faculty instruction using the G-RATE.",
    author = "Nikitha Sambamurthy and Berdanier, {Catherine G P.} and Cox, {Monica Farmer} and Lv, {Miss Jing} and Yukiko Maeda and Johari, {Syafiah Mahfuzah}",
    year = "2015",
    language = "English (US)",
    booktitle = "122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society",
    publisher = "American Society for Engineering Education",
    address = "United States",

    }

    Sambamurthy, N, Berdanier, CGP, Cox, MF, Lv, MJ, Maeda, Y & Johari, SM 2015, Making meaning of data: Exploring representations of classroom activities from a first year engineering course. in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society. American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, United States, 6/14/15.

    Making meaning of data : Exploring representations of classroom activities from a first year engineering course. / Sambamurthy, Nikitha; Berdanier, Catherine G P.; Cox, Monica Farmer; Lv, Miss Jing; Maeda, Yukiko; Johari, Syafiah Mahfuzah.

    122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society. American Society for Engineering Education, 2015.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Making meaning of data

    T2 - Exploring representations of classroom activities from a first year engineering course

    AU - Sambamurthy, Nikitha

    AU - Berdanier, Catherine G P.

    AU - Cox, Monica Farmer

    AU - Lv, Miss Jing

    AU - Maeda, Yukiko

    AU - Johari, Syafiah Mahfuzah

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Real-time, pedagogical feedback can be useful for instructors and graduate teaching assistants in assessing the effectiveness of their instructional activities. This is especially useful in first-year engineering classes, where laboratory and team activities may be more common. The G-RATE, Global Real-Time Assessment Tool for Teaching Enhancement, is a tool to provide research-based feedback for instructors about their classroom interactions across four areas based on the "How People Learn" framework1: knowledge-centeredness, community centeredness, learner-centeredness, and assessment-centeredness. The G-RATE provides a teaching profile across these categories, as well as a chronological profile of teaching interactions. Given the huge amounts of classroom data captured over large spans of time, the process of effectively representing the depth and breadth of classroom activities becomes messy. How can data be represented in a detailed, meaningful manner that can inform educators' teaching practices? Using data collected among 7 instructors in a first-year engineering course at a large Midwestern university, the authors present an overview of data collection techniques used to inform faculty about their pedagogical instruction. Implications for translating this data into feedback are presented along with sample profiles of faculty instruction using the G-RATE.

    AB - Real-time, pedagogical feedback can be useful for instructors and graduate teaching assistants in assessing the effectiveness of their instructional activities. This is especially useful in first-year engineering classes, where laboratory and team activities may be more common. The G-RATE, Global Real-Time Assessment Tool for Teaching Enhancement, is a tool to provide research-based feedback for instructors about their classroom interactions across four areas based on the "How People Learn" framework1: knowledge-centeredness, community centeredness, learner-centeredness, and assessment-centeredness. The G-RATE provides a teaching profile across these categories, as well as a chronological profile of teaching interactions. Given the huge amounts of classroom data captured over large spans of time, the process of effectively representing the depth and breadth of classroom activities becomes messy. How can data be represented in a detailed, meaningful manner that can inform educators' teaching practices? Using data collected among 7 instructors in a first-year engineering course at a large Midwestern university, the authors present an overview of data collection techniques used to inform faculty about their pedagogical instruction. Implications for translating this data into feedback are presented along with sample profiles of faculty instruction using the G-RATE.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941997752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941997752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Conference contribution

    BT - 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society

    PB - American Society for Engineering Education

    ER -

    Sambamurthy N, Berdanier CGP, Cox MF, Lv MJ, Maeda Y, Johari SM. Making meaning of data: Exploring representations of classroom activities from a first year engineering course. In 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society. American Society for Engineering Education. 2015