Making space for choice, voice and critique: critical literacy workshop in the era of Trump

Charlotte L. Land, Laura A. Taylor, Haylee Lavender, Barbara McKinnon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to consider how students and teachers engaged in political work in their design and enactment of critical literacy workshops in one US elementary school facing pressures of accountability and standardization. Design/methodology/approach: As a collaborative team of university researchers and classroom teachers, the authors used a qualitative, thematic approach to analyze data collected across a two-year, ethnographic case study. Findings: Drawing on Janks’ (2012) conceptualization of p/Politics, this analysis identified three ways in which teachers approached their teaching politically: constructing flexible and broad definitions of readers and writers; blurring hierarchies between teachers, students and texts; and viewing literacy as a tool of power. In addition to elaborating on these themes, the findings illustrate how these political teaching practices supported students’ engagement with explicitly Political topics. Originality/value: The era of Trump and “fake news” calls for people to not only start discussions about important social issues but also be able to engage in these discussions diplomatically and critically – in other words, to not only respond to the world but also to reconstruct it (Luke, 2004) and to imagine it better (Greene, 1995). This study offers a timely examination of ways to reshape reading and writing workshops in more critical ways, helping to prepare students for participation in the civic, career and personal worlds within and beyond school.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-43
Number of pages16
JournalEnglish Teaching
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

literacy
teacher
student
social issue
teaching practice
student teacher
elementary school
news
writer
career
classroom
responsibility
examination
participation
politics
university
methodology
Teaching
school
Critical Literacy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Land, Charlotte L. ; Taylor, Laura A. ; Lavender, Haylee ; McKinnon, Barbara. / Making space for choice, voice and critique : critical literacy workshop in the era of Trump. In: English Teaching. 2018 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 28-43.
@article{851a3672b7534aa3b112c5d116736249,
title = "Making space for choice, voice and critique: critical literacy workshop in the era of Trump",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper aims to consider how students and teachers engaged in political work in their design and enactment of critical literacy workshops in one US elementary school facing pressures of accountability and standardization. Design/methodology/approach: As a collaborative team of university researchers and classroom teachers, the authors used a qualitative, thematic approach to analyze data collected across a two-year, ethnographic case study. Findings: Drawing on Janks’ (2012) conceptualization of p/Politics, this analysis identified three ways in which teachers approached their teaching politically: constructing flexible and broad definitions of readers and writers; blurring hierarchies between teachers, students and texts; and viewing literacy as a tool of power. In addition to elaborating on these themes, the findings illustrate how these political teaching practices supported students’ engagement with explicitly Political topics. Originality/value: The era of Trump and “fake news” calls for people to not only start discussions about important social issues but also be able to engage in these discussions diplomatically and critically – in other words, to not only respond to the world but also to reconstruct it (Luke, 2004) and to imagine it better (Greene, 1995). This study offers a timely examination of ways to reshape reading and writing workshops in more critical ways, helping to prepare students for participation in the civic, career and personal worlds within and beyond school.",
author = "Land, {Charlotte L.} and Taylor, {Laura A.} and Haylee Lavender and Barbara McKinnon",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/ETPC-06-2017-0100",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "28--43",
journal = "English Teaching",
issn = "1175-8708",
publisher = "University of Waikato",
number = "1",

}

Making space for choice, voice and critique : critical literacy workshop in the era of Trump. / Land, Charlotte L.; Taylor, Laura A.; Lavender, Haylee; McKinnon, Barbara.

In: English Teaching, Vol. 17, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 28-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making space for choice, voice and critique

T2 - critical literacy workshop in the era of Trump

AU - Land, Charlotte L.

AU - Taylor, Laura A.

AU - Lavender, Haylee

AU - McKinnon, Barbara

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: This paper aims to consider how students and teachers engaged in political work in their design and enactment of critical literacy workshops in one US elementary school facing pressures of accountability and standardization. Design/methodology/approach: As a collaborative team of university researchers and classroom teachers, the authors used a qualitative, thematic approach to analyze data collected across a two-year, ethnographic case study. Findings: Drawing on Janks’ (2012) conceptualization of p/Politics, this analysis identified three ways in which teachers approached their teaching politically: constructing flexible and broad definitions of readers and writers; blurring hierarchies between teachers, students and texts; and viewing literacy as a tool of power. In addition to elaborating on these themes, the findings illustrate how these political teaching practices supported students’ engagement with explicitly Political topics. Originality/value: The era of Trump and “fake news” calls for people to not only start discussions about important social issues but also be able to engage in these discussions diplomatically and critically – in other words, to not only respond to the world but also to reconstruct it (Luke, 2004) and to imagine it better (Greene, 1995). This study offers a timely examination of ways to reshape reading and writing workshops in more critical ways, helping to prepare students for participation in the civic, career and personal worlds within and beyond school.

AB - Purpose: This paper aims to consider how students and teachers engaged in political work in their design and enactment of critical literacy workshops in one US elementary school facing pressures of accountability and standardization. Design/methodology/approach: As a collaborative team of university researchers and classroom teachers, the authors used a qualitative, thematic approach to analyze data collected across a two-year, ethnographic case study. Findings: Drawing on Janks’ (2012) conceptualization of p/Politics, this analysis identified three ways in which teachers approached their teaching politically: constructing flexible and broad definitions of readers and writers; blurring hierarchies between teachers, students and texts; and viewing literacy as a tool of power. In addition to elaborating on these themes, the findings illustrate how these political teaching practices supported students’ engagement with explicitly Political topics. Originality/value: The era of Trump and “fake news” calls for people to not only start discussions about important social issues but also be able to engage in these discussions diplomatically and critically – in other words, to not only respond to the world but also to reconstruct it (Luke, 2004) and to imagine it better (Greene, 1995). This study offers a timely examination of ways to reshape reading and writing workshops in more critical ways, helping to prepare students for participation in the civic, career and personal worlds within and beyond school.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045112162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045112162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/ETPC-06-2017-0100

DO - 10.1108/ETPC-06-2017-0100

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045112162

VL - 17

SP - 28

EP - 43

JO - English Teaching

JF - English Teaching

SN - 1175-8708

IS - 1

ER -