Managing the message: Using social influence and attitude change strategies to confront interpersonal discrimination

Janet Kay Swim, Sarah J. Gervais, Nicholas Pearson, Charles Stangor

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Members of stigmatized groups frequently find themselves as targets of interpersonal discrimination (e.g., Swim, Hyers, Cohen, & Ferguson, 2001; Swim, Hyers, Cohen, Fitzgerald, & Bylsma, 2003; Swim, Pearson, & Johnston, 2007). Interpersonal discrimination is defined as unfair or derogatory treatment based on social group membership (e.g., sex, race, age, sexual orientation, religion, or disability) that emerges within interpersonal contexts. It includes overtly hostile acts, covert acts designed to hide prejudices, and more subtle acts based upon, for example, habitual or normative behavior (Benokraitis & Feagin, 1986). For instance, the stigmatized may experience poor service in public establishments, be the target of racist jokes, experience sexually objectifying street comments, or assumptions of heterosexuality. Perhaps not surprisingly, targets of discrimination and bystanders often feel a desire to confront interpersonal discrimination, and one primary goal of such confrontation is to reduce prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (Feagin & Sikes, 1994; Hyers, 2007). However, the extent to which confronters are successful may depend upon factors that are related to attitude and behavior changes more generally. The purpose of this chapter is to consider ways that individuals can strategically manage interpersonal confrontations of discrimination to reduce prejudice. We define confrontation as any behavior or verbalization that indicates disagreement with another's behavior or comments. We focus on prejudice reduction, rather than other possible social goals (e.g., enhance personal control) because it acknowledges the agency that confronters can have in reducing prejudice (Swim, Hyers, & Cohen, 1998).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCoping with Minority Status
Subtitle of host publicationResponses to Exclusion and Inclusion
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages55-81
Number of pages27
ISBN (Electronic)9780511804465
ISBN (Print)9780521854993
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Stereotyping
Heterosexuality
Religion
Sexual Behavior
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Swim, J. K., Gervais, S. J., Pearson, N., & Stangor, C. (2009). Managing the message: Using social influence and attitude change strategies to confront interpersonal discrimination. In Coping with Minority Status: Responses to Exclusion and Inclusion (pp. 55-81). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804465.004
Swim, Janet Kay ; Gervais, Sarah J. ; Pearson, Nicholas ; Stangor, Charles. / Managing the message : Using social influence and attitude change strategies to confront interpersonal discrimination. Coping with Minority Status: Responses to Exclusion and Inclusion. Cambridge University Press, 2009. pp. 55-81
@inbook{cebbc59fd6a34cae8aef6e9aae2950d2,
title = "Managing the message: Using social influence and attitude change strategies to confront interpersonal discrimination",
abstract = "Members of stigmatized groups frequently find themselves as targets of interpersonal discrimination (e.g., Swim, Hyers, Cohen, & Ferguson, 2001; Swim, Hyers, Cohen, Fitzgerald, & Bylsma, 2003; Swim, Pearson, & Johnston, 2007). Interpersonal discrimination is defined as unfair or derogatory treatment based on social group membership (e.g., sex, race, age, sexual orientation, religion, or disability) that emerges within interpersonal contexts. It includes overtly hostile acts, covert acts designed to hide prejudices, and more subtle acts based upon, for example, habitual or normative behavior (Benokraitis & Feagin, 1986). For instance, the stigmatized may experience poor service in public establishments, be the target of racist jokes, experience sexually objectifying street comments, or assumptions of heterosexuality. Perhaps not surprisingly, targets of discrimination and bystanders often feel a desire to confront interpersonal discrimination, and one primary goal of such confrontation is to reduce prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (Feagin & Sikes, 1994; Hyers, 2007). However, the extent to which confronters are successful may depend upon factors that are related to attitude and behavior changes more generally. The purpose of this chapter is to consider ways that individuals can strategically manage interpersonal confrontations of discrimination to reduce prejudice. We define confrontation as any behavior or verbalization that indicates disagreement with another's behavior or comments. We focus on prejudice reduction, rather than other possible social goals (e.g., enhance personal control) because it acknowledges the agency that confronters can have in reducing prejudice (Swim, Hyers, & Cohen, 1998).",
author = "Swim, {Janet Kay} and Gervais, {Sarah J.} and Nicholas Pearson and Charles Stangor",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511804465.004",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521854993",
pages = "55--81",
booktitle = "Coping with Minority Status",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Swim, JK, Gervais, SJ, Pearson, N & Stangor, C 2009, Managing the message: Using social influence and attitude change strategies to confront interpersonal discrimination. in Coping with Minority Status: Responses to Exclusion and Inclusion. Cambridge University Press, pp. 55-81. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804465.004

Managing the message : Using social influence and attitude change strategies to confront interpersonal discrimination. / Swim, Janet Kay; Gervais, Sarah J.; Pearson, Nicholas; Stangor, Charles.

Coping with Minority Status: Responses to Exclusion and Inclusion. Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. 55-81.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Managing the message

T2 - Using social influence and attitude change strategies to confront interpersonal discrimination

AU - Swim, Janet Kay

AU - Gervais, Sarah J.

AU - Pearson, Nicholas

AU - Stangor, Charles

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Members of stigmatized groups frequently find themselves as targets of interpersonal discrimination (e.g., Swim, Hyers, Cohen, & Ferguson, 2001; Swim, Hyers, Cohen, Fitzgerald, & Bylsma, 2003; Swim, Pearson, & Johnston, 2007). Interpersonal discrimination is defined as unfair or derogatory treatment based on social group membership (e.g., sex, race, age, sexual orientation, religion, or disability) that emerges within interpersonal contexts. It includes overtly hostile acts, covert acts designed to hide prejudices, and more subtle acts based upon, for example, habitual or normative behavior (Benokraitis & Feagin, 1986). For instance, the stigmatized may experience poor service in public establishments, be the target of racist jokes, experience sexually objectifying street comments, or assumptions of heterosexuality. Perhaps not surprisingly, targets of discrimination and bystanders often feel a desire to confront interpersonal discrimination, and one primary goal of such confrontation is to reduce prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (Feagin & Sikes, 1994; Hyers, 2007). However, the extent to which confronters are successful may depend upon factors that are related to attitude and behavior changes more generally. The purpose of this chapter is to consider ways that individuals can strategically manage interpersonal confrontations of discrimination to reduce prejudice. We define confrontation as any behavior or verbalization that indicates disagreement with another's behavior or comments. We focus on prejudice reduction, rather than other possible social goals (e.g., enhance personal control) because it acknowledges the agency that confronters can have in reducing prejudice (Swim, Hyers, & Cohen, 1998).

AB - Members of stigmatized groups frequently find themselves as targets of interpersonal discrimination (e.g., Swim, Hyers, Cohen, & Ferguson, 2001; Swim, Hyers, Cohen, Fitzgerald, & Bylsma, 2003; Swim, Pearson, & Johnston, 2007). Interpersonal discrimination is defined as unfair or derogatory treatment based on social group membership (e.g., sex, race, age, sexual orientation, religion, or disability) that emerges within interpersonal contexts. It includes overtly hostile acts, covert acts designed to hide prejudices, and more subtle acts based upon, for example, habitual or normative behavior (Benokraitis & Feagin, 1986). For instance, the stigmatized may experience poor service in public establishments, be the target of racist jokes, experience sexually objectifying street comments, or assumptions of heterosexuality. Perhaps not surprisingly, targets of discrimination and bystanders often feel a desire to confront interpersonal discrimination, and one primary goal of such confrontation is to reduce prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (Feagin & Sikes, 1994; Hyers, 2007). However, the extent to which confronters are successful may depend upon factors that are related to attitude and behavior changes more generally. The purpose of this chapter is to consider ways that individuals can strategically manage interpersonal confrontations of discrimination to reduce prejudice. We define confrontation as any behavior or verbalization that indicates disagreement with another's behavior or comments. We focus on prejudice reduction, rather than other possible social goals (e.g., enhance personal control) because it acknowledges the agency that confronters can have in reducing prejudice (Swim, Hyers, & Cohen, 1998).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882314861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882314861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511804465.004

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511804465.004

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84882314861

SN - 9780521854993

SP - 55

EP - 81

BT - Coping with Minority Status

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Swim JK, Gervais SJ, Pearson N, Stangor C. Managing the message: Using social influence and attitude change strategies to confront interpersonal discrimination. In Coping with Minority Status: Responses to Exclusion and Inclusion. Cambridge University Press. 2009. p. 55-81 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804465.004