Mandated college students' response to sequentially administered alcohol interventions in a randomized clinical trial using stepped care

Brian Borsari, Molly Magill, Nadine R. Mastroleo, John T.P. Hustad, Tracy O.Leary Tevyaw, Nancy P. Barnett, Christopher W. Kahler, Erica Eaton, Peter M. Monti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Students referred to school administration for alcohol policies violations currently receive a wide variety of interventions. This study examined predictors of response to 2 interventions delivered to mandated college students (N = 598) using a stepped care approach incorporating a peer-delivered 15-min brief advice (BA) session (Step 1) and a 60- to 90-min brief motivational intervention (BMI) delivered by trained interventionists (Step 2). Method: Analyses were completed in 2 stages. First, 3 types of variables (screening variables, alcohol-related cognitions, mandated student profile) were examined in a logistic regression model as putative predictors of lower risk drinking (defined as 3 or fewer heavy episodic drinking [HED] episodes and/or 4 or fewer alcohol-related consequences in the past month) 6 weeks following the BA session. Second, we used generalized estimating equations to examine putative moderators of BMI effects on HED and peak blood alcohol content compared with assessment only (AO) control over the 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-ups. Results: Participants reporting lower scores on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, more benefits to changing alcohol use, and those who fit the "Bad Incident" profile at baseline were more likely to report lower risk drinking 6 weeks after the BA session. Moderation analyses revealed that Bad Incident students who received the BMI reported more HED at 9-month follow-up than those who received AO. Conclusion: Current alcohol use as well as personal reaction to the referral event may have clinical utility in identifying which mandated students benefit from treatments of varying content and intensity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-112
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of consulting and clinical psychology
Volume84
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Randomized Controlled Trials
Drinking
Alcohols
Students
Logistic Models
Cognition
Referral and Consultation
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Borsari, Brian ; Magill, Molly ; Mastroleo, Nadine R. ; Hustad, John T.P. ; Tevyaw, Tracy O.Leary ; Barnett, Nancy P. ; Kahler, Christopher W. ; Eaton, Erica ; Monti, Peter M. / Mandated college students' response to sequentially administered alcohol interventions in a randomized clinical trial using stepped care. In: Journal of consulting and clinical psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 84, No. 2. pp. 103-112.
@article{cda2aa7aa16a48c48c0aef2d9573150d,
title = "Mandated college students' response to sequentially administered alcohol interventions in a randomized clinical trial using stepped care",
abstract = "Objective: Students referred to school administration for alcohol policies violations currently receive a wide variety of interventions. This study examined predictors of response to 2 interventions delivered to mandated college students (N = 598) using a stepped care approach incorporating a peer-delivered 15-min brief advice (BA) session (Step 1) and a 60- to 90-min brief motivational intervention (BMI) delivered by trained interventionists (Step 2). Method: Analyses were completed in 2 stages. First, 3 types of variables (screening variables, alcohol-related cognitions, mandated student profile) were examined in a logistic regression model as putative predictors of lower risk drinking (defined as 3 or fewer heavy episodic drinking [HED] episodes and/or 4 or fewer alcohol-related consequences in the past month) 6 weeks following the BA session. Second, we used generalized estimating equations to examine putative moderators of BMI effects on HED and peak blood alcohol content compared with assessment only (AO) control over the 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-ups. Results: Participants reporting lower scores on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, more benefits to changing alcohol use, and those who fit the {"}Bad Incident{"} profile at baseline were more likely to report lower risk drinking 6 weeks after the BA session. Moderation analyses revealed that Bad Incident students who received the BMI reported more HED at 9-month follow-up than those who received AO. Conclusion: Current alcohol use as well as personal reaction to the referral event may have clinical utility in identifying which mandated students benefit from treatments of varying content and intensity.",
author = "Brian Borsari and Molly Magill and Mastroleo, {Nadine R.} and Hustad, {John T.P.} and Tevyaw, {Tracy O.Leary} and Barnett, {Nancy P.} and Kahler, {Christopher W.} and Erica Eaton and Monti, {Peter M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0039800",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "103--112",
journal = "Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology",
issn = "0022-006X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Mandated college students' response to sequentially administered alcohol interventions in a randomized clinical trial using stepped care. / Borsari, Brian; Magill, Molly; Mastroleo, Nadine R.; Hustad, John T.P.; Tevyaw, Tracy O.Leary; Barnett, Nancy P.; Kahler, Christopher W.; Eaton, Erica; Monti, Peter M.

In: Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, Vol. 84, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 103-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mandated college students' response to sequentially administered alcohol interventions in a randomized clinical trial using stepped care

AU - Borsari, Brian

AU - Magill, Molly

AU - Mastroleo, Nadine R.

AU - Hustad, John T.P.

AU - Tevyaw, Tracy O.Leary

AU - Barnett, Nancy P.

AU - Kahler, Christopher W.

AU - Eaton, Erica

AU - Monti, Peter M.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Objective: Students referred to school administration for alcohol policies violations currently receive a wide variety of interventions. This study examined predictors of response to 2 interventions delivered to mandated college students (N = 598) using a stepped care approach incorporating a peer-delivered 15-min brief advice (BA) session (Step 1) and a 60- to 90-min brief motivational intervention (BMI) delivered by trained interventionists (Step 2). Method: Analyses were completed in 2 stages. First, 3 types of variables (screening variables, alcohol-related cognitions, mandated student profile) were examined in a logistic regression model as putative predictors of lower risk drinking (defined as 3 or fewer heavy episodic drinking [HED] episodes and/or 4 or fewer alcohol-related consequences in the past month) 6 weeks following the BA session. Second, we used generalized estimating equations to examine putative moderators of BMI effects on HED and peak blood alcohol content compared with assessment only (AO) control over the 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-ups. Results: Participants reporting lower scores on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, more benefits to changing alcohol use, and those who fit the "Bad Incident" profile at baseline were more likely to report lower risk drinking 6 weeks after the BA session. Moderation analyses revealed that Bad Incident students who received the BMI reported more HED at 9-month follow-up than those who received AO. Conclusion: Current alcohol use as well as personal reaction to the referral event may have clinical utility in identifying which mandated students benefit from treatments of varying content and intensity.

AB - Objective: Students referred to school administration for alcohol policies violations currently receive a wide variety of interventions. This study examined predictors of response to 2 interventions delivered to mandated college students (N = 598) using a stepped care approach incorporating a peer-delivered 15-min brief advice (BA) session (Step 1) and a 60- to 90-min brief motivational intervention (BMI) delivered by trained interventionists (Step 2). Method: Analyses were completed in 2 stages. First, 3 types of variables (screening variables, alcohol-related cognitions, mandated student profile) were examined in a logistic regression model as putative predictors of lower risk drinking (defined as 3 or fewer heavy episodic drinking [HED] episodes and/or 4 or fewer alcohol-related consequences in the past month) 6 weeks following the BA session. Second, we used generalized estimating equations to examine putative moderators of BMI effects on HED and peak blood alcohol content compared with assessment only (AO) control over the 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-ups. Results: Participants reporting lower scores on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, more benefits to changing alcohol use, and those who fit the "Bad Incident" profile at baseline were more likely to report lower risk drinking 6 weeks after the BA session. Moderation analyses revealed that Bad Incident students who received the BMI reported more HED at 9-month follow-up than those who received AO. Conclusion: Current alcohol use as well as personal reaction to the referral event may have clinical utility in identifying which mandated students benefit from treatments of varying content and intensity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955205488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955205488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0039800

DO - 10.1037/a0039800

M3 - Article

C2 - 26460571

AN - SCOPUS:84955205488

VL - 84

SP - 103

EP - 112

JO - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

JF - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

SN - 0022-006X

IS - 2

ER -