Mandated reporting thresholds for community professionals

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines how community-based mandated reporters understand and interpret reasonable suspicion, the standard threshold for mandated reporting of suspected child abuse. Respondents were asked to identify the probability necessary for "suspicion of child abuse" to constitute reasonable suspicion. Data were analyzed for internal consistency, evidence of a group standard, and associations with professional and educational demographics. There was a 90.4% response rate (1,233/1,364). On both ordinal probability and estimated probability scales, respondents demonstrated wide variability in the thresholds they identified for what constitutes reasonable suspicion. Comparing individual responses for the two scales, 83% were inconsistent. Responses on the estimated probability scale were correlated with frequency of reporting child abuse, professional background, and prior education on child abuse. Lack of consensus in how community professionals interpret reasonable suspicion raises the question of whether more specific training is needed for this threshold to be understood, interpreted, and applied in a consistent manner.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-53
Number of pages19
JournalChild welfare
Volume91
Issue number1
StatePublished - Aug 20 2012

Fingerprint

Child Abuse
Demography
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{be72eacbf1854d86b5f7d1cde0b7667a,
title = "Mandated reporting thresholds for community professionals",
abstract = "This study examines how community-based mandated reporters understand and interpret reasonable suspicion, the standard threshold for mandated reporting of suspected child abuse. Respondents were asked to identify the probability necessary for {"}suspicion of child abuse{"} to constitute reasonable suspicion. Data were analyzed for internal consistency, evidence of a group standard, and associations with professional and educational demographics. There was a 90.4{\%} response rate (1,233/1,364). On both ordinal probability and estimated probability scales, respondents demonstrated wide variability in the thresholds they identified for what constitutes reasonable suspicion. Comparing individual responses for the two scales, 83{\%} were inconsistent. Responses on the estimated probability scale were correlated with frequency of reporting child abuse, professional background, and prior education on child abuse. Lack of consensus in how community professionals interpret reasonable suspicion raises the question of whether more specific training is needed for this threshold to be understood, interpreted, and applied in a consistent manner.",
author = "Kathryn Crowell and Benjamin Levi",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "20",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "35--53",
journal = "Child Welfare",
issn = "0009-4021",
publisher = "Child Welfare League of America, Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Mandated reporting thresholds for community professionals. / Crowell, Kathryn; Levi, Benjamin.

In: Child welfare, Vol. 91, No. 1, 20.08.2012, p. 35-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mandated reporting thresholds for community professionals

AU - Crowell, Kathryn

AU - Levi, Benjamin

PY - 2012/8/20

Y1 - 2012/8/20

N2 - This study examines how community-based mandated reporters understand and interpret reasonable suspicion, the standard threshold for mandated reporting of suspected child abuse. Respondents were asked to identify the probability necessary for "suspicion of child abuse" to constitute reasonable suspicion. Data were analyzed for internal consistency, evidence of a group standard, and associations with professional and educational demographics. There was a 90.4% response rate (1,233/1,364). On both ordinal probability and estimated probability scales, respondents demonstrated wide variability in the thresholds they identified for what constitutes reasonable suspicion. Comparing individual responses for the two scales, 83% were inconsistent. Responses on the estimated probability scale were correlated with frequency of reporting child abuse, professional background, and prior education on child abuse. Lack of consensus in how community professionals interpret reasonable suspicion raises the question of whether more specific training is needed for this threshold to be understood, interpreted, and applied in a consistent manner.

AB - This study examines how community-based mandated reporters understand and interpret reasonable suspicion, the standard threshold for mandated reporting of suspected child abuse. Respondents were asked to identify the probability necessary for "suspicion of child abuse" to constitute reasonable suspicion. Data were analyzed for internal consistency, evidence of a group standard, and associations with professional and educational demographics. There was a 90.4% response rate (1,233/1,364). On both ordinal probability and estimated probability scales, respondents demonstrated wide variability in the thresholds they identified for what constitutes reasonable suspicion. Comparing individual responses for the two scales, 83% were inconsistent. Responses on the estimated probability scale were correlated with frequency of reporting child abuse, professional background, and prior education on child abuse. Lack of consensus in how community professionals interpret reasonable suspicion raises the question of whether more specific training is needed for this threshold to be understood, interpreted, and applied in a consistent manner.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864983346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864983346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 35

EP - 53

JO - Child Welfare

JF - Child Welfare

SN - 0009-4021

IS - 1

ER -