ManyClasses 1: Assessing the Generalizable Effect of Immediate Feedback Versus Delayed Feedback Across Many College Classes

Emily R. Fyfe, Joshua R. de Leeuw, Paulo F. Carvalho, Robert L. Goldstone, Janelle Sherman, David Admiraal, Laura K. Alford, Alison Bonner, Chad E. Brassil, Christopher A. Brooks, Tracey Carbonetto, Sau Hou Chang, Laura Cruz, Melina Czymoniewicz-Klippel, Frances Daniel, Michelle Driessen, Noel Habashy, Carrie L. Hanson-Bradley, Edward R. Hirt, Virginia Hojas CarbonellDaniel K. Jackson, Shay Jones, Jennifer L. Keagy, Brandi Keith, Sarah J. Malmquist, Barry McQuarrie, Kelsey J. Metzger, Maung K. Min, Sameer Patil, Ryan S. Patrick, Etienne Pelaprat, Maureen L. Petrunich-Rutherford, Meghan R. Porter, Kristina Prescott, Cathrine Reck, Terri Renner, Eric Robbins, Adam R. Smith, Phil Stuczynski, Jaye Thompson, Nikolaos Tsotakos, Judith K. Turk, Kyle Unruh, Jennifer D. Webb, Stephanie N. Whitehead, Elaine C. Wisniewski, Ke Anne Zhang, Benjamin A. Motz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Psychology researchers have long attempted to identify educational practices that improve student learning. However, experimental research on these practices is often conducted in laboratory contexts or in a single course, which threatens the external validity of the results. In this article, we establish an experimental paradigm for evaluating the benefits of recommended practices across a variety of authentic educational contexts—a model we call ManyClasses. The core feature is that researchers examine the same research question and measure the same experimental effect across many classes spanning a range of topics, institutions, teacher implementations, and student populations. We report the first ManyClasses study, in which we examined how the timing of feedback on class assignments, either immediate or delayed by a few days, affected subsequent performance on class assessments. Across 38 classes, the overall estimate for the effect of feedback timing was 0.002 (95% highest density interval = [−0.05, 0.05]), which indicates that there was no effect of immediate feedback compared with delayed feedback on student learning that generalizes across classes. Furthermore, there were no credibly nonzero effects for 40 preregistered moderators related to class-level and student-level characteristics. Yet our results provide hints that in certain kinds of classes, which were undersampled in the current study, there may be modest advantages for delayed feedback. More broadly, these findings provide insights regarding the feasibility of conducting within-class randomized experiments across a range of naturally occurring learning environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAdvances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this