Map complexity

Comparison and measurement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Visual complexity is defined in this paper as the degree to which the combination of map elements results in a pattern that appears to be intricate or involved. A test involving judgments of choropleth and isopleth map complexity yields three conclusions: (1) choropleth maps are consistently perceived as more complex than isopleth maps made from the same data; (2) the relationship between choropleth and isopleth maps can be closely described with a power function; and (3) the number of class intervals has a greater effect on complexity than does the pattern of the distribution mapped. A measure of complexity applicable to the isopleth map as well as choropleth can be derived, then, using the power function. Three graph theoretic measures are considered as objective measures of choropleth map complexity, with correlations of 0.92 to 0.95 obtained between these measures and subjective complexity of choropleth maps. The graph theoretic measures for choropleth maps are then adjusted according to the power relationship observed between choropleth and isopleth subjective map complexity to yield a complexity measure for the latter map type. Similar procedures might be used to derive complexity measures for other map types.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-46
Number of pages16
JournalAmerican Cartographer
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1982

Fingerprint

comparison
Graph
test
effect
distribution

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Engineering(all)
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{7b3f9eba5816431b90d0f18d991029b9,
title = "Map complexity: Comparison and measurement",
abstract = "Visual complexity is defined in this paper as the degree to which the combination of map elements results in a pattern that appears to be intricate or involved. A test involving judgments of choropleth and isopleth map complexity yields three conclusions: (1) choropleth maps are consistently perceived as more complex than isopleth maps made from the same data; (2) the relationship between choropleth and isopleth maps can be closely described with a power function; and (3) the number of class intervals has a greater effect on complexity than does the pattern of the distribution mapped. A measure of complexity applicable to the isopleth map as well as choropleth can be derived, then, using the power function. Three graph theoretic measures are considered as objective measures of choropleth map complexity, with correlations of 0.92 to 0.95 obtained between these measures and subjective complexity of choropleth maps. The graph theoretic measures for choropleth maps are then adjusted according to the power relationship observed between choropleth and isopleth subjective map complexity to yield a complexity measure for the latter map type. Similar procedures might be used to derive complexity measures for other map types.",
author = "Alan Maceachren",
year = "1982",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1559/152304082783948286",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "31--46",
journal = "Cartography and Geographic Information Science",
issn = "1523-0406",
publisher = "American Congress on Surveying and Mapping",
number = "1",

}

Map complexity : Comparison and measurement. / Maceachren, Alan.

In: American Cartographer, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.01.1982, p. 31-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Map complexity

T2 - Comparison and measurement

AU - Maceachren, Alan

PY - 1982/1/1

Y1 - 1982/1/1

N2 - Visual complexity is defined in this paper as the degree to which the combination of map elements results in a pattern that appears to be intricate or involved. A test involving judgments of choropleth and isopleth map complexity yields three conclusions: (1) choropleth maps are consistently perceived as more complex than isopleth maps made from the same data; (2) the relationship between choropleth and isopleth maps can be closely described with a power function; and (3) the number of class intervals has a greater effect on complexity than does the pattern of the distribution mapped. A measure of complexity applicable to the isopleth map as well as choropleth can be derived, then, using the power function. Three graph theoretic measures are considered as objective measures of choropleth map complexity, with correlations of 0.92 to 0.95 obtained between these measures and subjective complexity of choropleth maps. The graph theoretic measures for choropleth maps are then adjusted according to the power relationship observed between choropleth and isopleth subjective map complexity to yield a complexity measure for the latter map type. Similar procedures might be used to derive complexity measures for other map types.

AB - Visual complexity is defined in this paper as the degree to which the combination of map elements results in a pattern that appears to be intricate or involved. A test involving judgments of choropleth and isopleth map complexity yields three conclusions: (1) choropleth maps are consistently perceived as more complex than isopleth maps made from the same data; (2) the relationship between choropleth and isopleth maps can be closely described with a power function; and (3) the number of class intervals has a greater effect on complexity than does the pattern of the distribution mapped. A measure of complexity applicable to the isopleth map as well as choropleth can be derived, then, using the power function. Three graph theoretic measures are considered as objective measures of choropleth map complexity, with correlations of 0.92 to 0.95 obtained between these measures and subjective complexity of choropleth maps. The graph theoretic measures for choropleth maps are then adjusted according to the power relationship observed between choropleth and isopleth subjective map complexity to yield a complexity measure for the latter map type. Similar procedures might be used to derive complexity measures for other map types.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019999395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019999395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1559/152304082783948286

DO - 10.1559/152304082783948286

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 31

EP - 46

JO - Cartography and Geographic Information Science

JF - Cartography and Geographic Information Science

SN - 1523-0406

IS - 1

ER -