Market-level exposure to state antismoking media campaigns and public support for tobacco control policy in the United States, 2001-2002

Jeff Niederdeppe, Maxwell Kellogg, Christofer Skurka, Rosemary J. Avery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective This study tests whether exposure to state antismoking media campaigns is associated with increased support for comprehensive bans on smoking indoors and cigarette advertising. Methods We combine commercially available data on market-level state-sponsored antismoking advertisements with three waves of the Current Population Survey's Tobacco Use Supplement to test the relationship between market-level volume of state antismoking advertising exposure and support for tobacco control policy between 2001 and 2002. We use logistic regression to assess which message themes employed in the advertisements are associated with increased support for tobacco control policy. Results The overall market-level volume of exposure to state antismoking ads targeted to adults or the general population was associated with significant increases in support for comprehensive indoor smoking bans. These effects were driven by exposure to ads emphasising the health consequences of smoking to others, anti-industry appeals and irrationality/addiction appeals. Evidence of campaign impact on support for tobacco advertising bans was less clear and, when statistically significant, small in magnitude relative to the impact of the state economic and tobacco control policy environment. Conclusions This study shows that that large-scale antismoking media campaigns can have a meaningful secondary impact on support for comprehensive indoor smoking bans. Future research should identify the conditions under which mass media campaigns primarily targeting smoking behaviour may influence public support for a variety of other tobacco control policies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)177-184
Number of pages8
JournalTobacco Control
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

public support
nicotine
Tobacco
campaign
Smoking
smoking
market
ban
appeal
advertising ban
Mass Media
Tobacco Use
health consequences
Population
Industry
mass media
addiction
Logistic Models
supplement
Economics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{ee54a07103bc44708e7d899bf2738c41,
title = "Market-level exposure to state antismoking media campaigns and public support for tobacco control policy in the United States, 2001-2002",
abstract = "Objective This study tests whether exposure to state antismoking media campaigns is associated with increased support for comprehensive bans on smoking indoors and cigarette advertising. Methods We combine commercially available data on market-level state-sponsored antismoking advertisements with three waves of the Current Population Survey's Tobacco Use Supplement to test the relationship between market-level volume of state antismoking advertising exposure and support for tobacco control policy between 2001 and 2002. We use logistic regression to assess which message themes employed in the advertisements are associated with increased support for tobacco control policy. Results The overall market-level volume of exposure to state antismoking ads targeted to adults or the general population was associated with significant increases in support for comprehensive indoor smoking bans. These effects were driven by exposure to ads emphasising the health consequences of smoking to others, anti-industry appeals and irrationality/addiction appeals. Evidence of campaign impact on support for tobacco advertising bans was less clear and, when statistically significant, small in magnitude relative to the impact of the state economic and tobacco control policy environment. Conclusions This study shows that that large-scale antismoking media campaigns can have a meaningful secondary impact on support for comprehensive indoor smoking bans. Future research should identify the conditions under which mass media campaigns primarily targeting smoking behaviour may influence public support for a variety of other tobacco control policies.",
author = "Jeff Niederdeppe and Maxwell Kellogg and Christofer Skurka and Avery, {Rosemary J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053506",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "177--184",
journal = "Tobacco Control",
issn = "0964-4563",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

Market-level exposure to state antismoking media campaigns and public support for tobacco control policy in the United States, 2001-2002. / Niederdeppe, Jeff; Kellogg, Maxwell; Skurka, Christofer; Avery, Rosemary J.

In: Tobacco Control, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 177-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Market-level exposure to state antismoking media campaigns and public support for tobacco control policy in the United States, 2001-2002

AU - Niederdeppe, Jeff

AU - Kellogg, Maxwell

AU - Skurka, Christofer

AU - Avery, Rosemary J.

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Objective This study tests whether exposure to state antismoking media campaigns is associated with increased support for comprehensive bans on smoking indoors and cigarette advertising. Methods We combine commercially available data on market-level state-sponsored antismoking advertisements with three waves of the Current Population Survey's Tobacco Use Supplement to test the relationship between market-level volume of state antismoking advertising exposure and support for tobacco control policy between 2001 and 2002. We use logistic regression to assess which message themes employed in the advertisements are associated with increased support for tobacco control policy. Results The overall market-level volume of exposure to state antismoking ads targeted to adults or the general population was associated with significant increases in support for comprehensive indoor smoking bans. These effects were driven by exposure to ads emphasising the health consequences of smoking to others, anti-industry appeals and irrationality/addiction appeals. Evidence of campaign impact on support for tobacco advertising bans was less clear and, when statistically significant, small in magnitude relative to the impact of the state economic and tobacco control policy environment. Conclusions This study shows that that large-scale antismoking media campaigns can have a meaningful secondary impact on support for comprehensive indoor smoking bans. Future research should identify the conditions under which mass media campaigns primarily targeting smoking behaviour may influence public support for a variety of other tobacco control policies.

AB - Objective This study tests whether exposure to state antismoking media campaigns is associated with increased support for comprehensive bans on smoking indoors and cigarette advertising. Methods We combine commercially available data on market-level state-sponsored antismoking advertisements with three waves of the Current Population Survey's Tobacco Use Supplement to test the relationship between market-level volume of state antismoking advertising exposure and support for tobacco control policy between 2001 and 2002. We use logistic regression to assess which message themes employed in the advertisements are associated with increased support for tobacco control policy. Results The overall market-level volume of exposure to state antismoking ads targeted to adults or the general population was associated with significant increases in support for comprehensive indoor smoking bans. These effects were driven by exposure to ads emphasising the health consequences of smoking to others, anti-industry appeals and irrationality/addiction appeals. Evidence of campaign impact on support for tobacco advertising bans was less clear and, when statistically significant, small in magnitude relative to the impact of the state economic and tobacco control policy environment. Conclusions This study shows that that large-scale antismoking media campaigns can have a meaningful secondary impact on support for comprehensive indoor smoking bans. Future research should identify the conditions under which mass media campaigns primarily targeting smoking behaviour may influence public support for a variety of other tobacco control policies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042882420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042882420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053506

DO - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053506

M3 - Article

C2 - 28315843

AN - SCOPUS:85042882420

VL - 27

SP - 177

EP - 184

JO - Tobacco Control

JF - Tobacco Control

SN - 0964-4563

IS - 2

ER -