Measuring and testing change in strategic management research

Donald D. Bergh, James F. Fairbank

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

65 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper reviews some critical issues associated with measuring and testing change and then reports on how strategy researchers have addressed those matters. We first discuss three key methodological requirements: reliability assumptions of change variables, correlations between the change variable and its initial measure, and selection of unbiased measurement alternatives. Next, we present data from a content analysis of 126 change studies which suggest that strategy researchers tend not to recognize those requirements. Indeed, the typical approach used to measure and test change (as a simple different between two measures of the same variable) is usually inappropriate and could lead to inaccurate findings and flawed conclusions. We conclude by offering suggestions for how change can be studied more rigorously.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)359-366
Number of pages8
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2002

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring and testing change in strategic management research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this