Measuring attitudes toward grievance systems: A procedural justice perspective applied to the workplace

Thomas J. Pavlak, Paul Clark, Daniel G. Gallagher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Contractual grievance procedures have long been utilized in union-management relationships to resolve workplace disputes. Little research attention, however, has focused on determining unionized workers' perceptions of and attitudes about such procedures. This study develops an instrument designed to measure worker attitudes toward the grievance procedure (ATGP). The survey items and conceptual framework are based on prior research in the areas of administrative and procedural justice. Employing a national sample (N=1080) from a single union, the results support a multidimensional attitudinal measure. Four key dimensions of workers' assessment of the grievance procedure were found: (i) Fairness, (ii) Effectiveness, (iii) Representation, and (iv) Importance. The structure of the measure was stable across identified sub-groups in the sample. Some differences in the attitudinal assessment on the four dimensions emerged depending upon union office holding and the grievance-filing experience of the respondents. Last, potential future applications of the instrument are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-194
Number of pages22
JournalSocial Justice Research
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 1992

Fingerprint

workplace
justice
worker
fairness
management
experience
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

@article{999b3d96c1324210b4759950672a785f,
title = "Measuring attitudes toward grievance systems: A procedural justice perspective applied to the workplace",
abstract = "Contractual grievance procedures have long been utilized in union-management relationships to resolve workplace disputes. Little research attention, however, has focused on determining unionized workers' perceptions of and attitudes about such procedures. This study develops an instrument designed to measure worker attitudes toward the grievance procedure (ATGP). The survey items and conceptual framework are based on prior research in the areas of administrative and procedural justice. Employing a national sample (N=1080) from a single union, the results support a multidimensional attitudinal measure. Four key dimensions of workers' assessment of the grievance procedure were found: (i) Fairness, (ii) Effectiveness, (iii) Representation, and (iv) Importance. The structure of the measure was stable across identified sub-groups in the sample. Some differences in the attitudinal assessment on the four dimensions emerged depending upon union office holding and the grievance-filing experience of the respondents. Last, potential future applications of the instrument are discussed.",
author = "Pavlak, {Thomas J.} and Paul Clark and Gallagher, {Daniel G.}",
year = "1992",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF01048706",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "173--194",
journal = "Social Justice Research",
issn = "0885-7466",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

Measuring attitudes toward grievance systems : A procedural justice perspective applied to the workplace. / Pavlak, Thomas J.; Clark, Paul; Gallagher, Daniel G.

In: Social Justice Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, 01.06.1992, p. 173-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring attitudes toward grievance systems

T2 - A procedural justice perspective applied to the workplace

AU - Pavlak, Thomas J.

AU - Clark, Paul

AU - Gallagher, Daniel G.

PY - 1992/6/1

Y1 - 1992/6/1

N2 - Contractual grievance procedures have long been utilized in union-management relationships to resolve workplace disputes. Little research attention, however, has focused on determining unionized workers' perceptions of and attitudes about such procedures. This study develops an instrument designed to measure worker attitudes toward the grievance procedure (ATGP). The survey items and conceptual framework are based on prior research in the areas of administrative and procedural justice. Employing a national sample (N=1080) from a single union, the results support a multidimensional attitudinal measure. Four key dimensions of workers' assessment of the grievance procedure were found: (i) Fairness, (ii) Effectiveness, (iii) Representation, and (iv) Importance. The structure of the measure was stable across identified sub-groups in the sample. Some differences in the attitudinal assessment on the four dimensions emerged depending upon union office holding and the grievance-filing experience of the respondents. Last, potential future applications of the instrument are discussed.

AB - Contractual grievance procedures have long been utilized in union-management relationships to resolve workplace disputes. Little research attention, however, has focused on determining unionized workers' perceptions of and attitudes about such procedures. This study develops an instrument designed to measure worker attitudes toward the grievance procedure (ATGP). The survey items and conceptual framework are based on prior research in the areas of administrative and procedural justice. Employing a national sample (N=1080) from a single union, the results support a multidimensional attitudinal measure. Four key dimensions of workers' assessment of the grievance procedure were found: (i) Fairness, (ii) Effectiveness, (iii) Representation, and (iv) Importance. The structure of the measure was stable across identified sub-groups in the sample. Some differences in the attitudinal assessment on the four dimensions emerged depending upon union office holding and the grievance-filing experience of the respondents. Last, potential future applications of the instrument are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249841436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249841436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01048706

DO - 10.1007/BF01048706

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34249841436

VL - 5

SP - 173

EP - 194

JO - Social Justice Research

JF - Social Justice Research

SN - 0885-7466

IS - 2

ER -