Measuring religious identities in surveys

Duane Francis Alwin, Jacob L. Felson, Edward T. Walker, Paula A. Tufiş

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to acquaint the broader public opinion research audience with what has been a salient issue within the community of scholars of religion. We address the question of how best to conceptualize and measure religious identities in research on contemporary American society. We consider the main approaches to the measurement of religious identification with regard to their backgrounds, their assumptions about the importance of understanding religious identities in historically relevant terms, and the practical considerations of survey measurement. Using data from the General Social Survey, particularly recent innovative efforts to obtain information on subjective association with particular religious traditions and/or movements (e.g., Pentecostal, fundamentalist, evangelical, mainline, or liberal Protestant), we compare the two main approaches: the traditional "denominational" approach, where religious identities are assumed to be associated with religious denominations, and the subjective approach, where religious identities are assumed to be captured by a set of " nondenominational" reference categories linked to particular historical religious traditions or social movements. We conclude that both approaches have substantial predictive validity, and the most effective strategy for future research may be one that uses a combination of approaches, rather than one that relies entirely on a single method of measurement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)530-564
Number of pages35
JournalPublic Opinion Quarterly
Volume70
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006

Fingerprint

opinion research
denomination
Social Movements
public opinion
Religion
Religious Identity
community
Religious Traditions
Society
Salient
Denomination
Public Opinion
Audience Research
Fundamentalists

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Alwin, D. F., Felson, J. L., Walker, E. T., & Tufiş, P. A. (2006). Measuring religious identities in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(4), 530-564. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl024
Alwin, Duane Francis ; Felson, Jacob L. ; Walker, Edward T. ; Tufiş, Paula A. / Measuring religious identities in surveys. In: Public Opinion Quarterly. 2006 ; Vol. 70, No. 4. pp. 530-564.
@article{730a549e292040c1805777c1cce69928,
title = "Measuring religious identities in surveys",
abstract = "The purpose of this article is to acquaint the broader public opinion research audience with what has been a salient issue within the community of scholars of religion. We address the question of how best to conceptualize and measure religious identities in research on contemporary American society. We consider the main approaches to the measurement of religious identification with regard to their backgrounds, their assumptions about the importance of understanding religious identities in historically relevant terms, and the practical considerations of survey measurement. Using data from the General Social Survey, particularly recent innovative efforts to obtain information on subjective association with particular religious traditions and/or movements (e.g., Pentecostal, fundamentalist, evangelical, mainline, or liberal Protestant), we compare the two main approaches: the traditional {"}denominational{"} approach, where religious identities are assumed to be associated with religious denominations, and the subjective approach, where religious identities are assumed to be captured by a set of {"} nondenominational{"} reference categories linked to particular historical religious traditions or social movements. We conclude that both approaches have substantial predictive validity, and the most effective strategy for future research may be one that uses a combination of approaches, rather than one that relies entirely on a single method of measurement.",
author = "Alwin, {Duane Francis} and Felson, {Jacob L.} and Walker, {Edward T.} and Tufiş, {Paula A.}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/poq/nfl024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "530--564",
journal = "Public Opinion Quarterly",
issn = "0033-362X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

Alwin, DF, Felson, JL, Walker, ET & Tufiş, PA 2006, 'Measuring religious identities in surveys', Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 530-564. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl024

Measuring religious identities in surveys. / Alwin, Duane Francis; Felson, Jacob L.; Walker, Edward T.; Tufiş, Paula A.

In: Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 70, No. 4, 01.12.2006, p. 530-564.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring religious identities in surveys

AU - Alwin, Duane Francis

AU - Felson, Jacob L.

AU - Walker, Edward T.

AU - Tufiş, Paula A.

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - The purpose of this article is to acquaint the broader public opinion research audience with what has been a salient issue within the community of scholars of religion. We address the question of how best to conceptualize and measure religious identities in research on contemporary American society. We consider the main approaches to the measurement of religious identification with regard to their backgrounds, their assumptions about the importance of understanding religious identities in historically relevant terms, and the practical considerations of survey measurement. Using data from the General Social Survey, particularly recent innovative efforts to obtain information on subjective association with particular religious traditions and/or movements (e.g., Pentecostal, fundamentalist, evangelical, mainline, or liberal Protestant), we compare the two main approaches: the traditional "denominational" approach, where religious identities are assumed to be associated with religious denominations, and the subjective approach, where religious identities are assumed to be captured by a set of " nondenominational" reference categories linked to particular historical religious traditions or social movements. We conclude that both approaches have substantial predictive validity, and the most effective strategy for future research may be one that uses a combination of approaches, rather than one that relies entirely on a single method of measurement.

AB - The purpose of this article is to acquaint the broader public opinion research audience with what has been a salient issue within the community of scholars of religion. We address the question of how best to conceptualize and measure religious identities in research on contemporary American society. We consider the main approaches to the measurement of religious identification with regard to their backgrounds, their assumptions about the importance of understanding religious identities in historically relevant terms, and the practical considerations of survey measurement. Using data from the General Social Survey, particularly recent innovative efforts to obtain information on subjective association with particular religious traditions and/or movements (e.g., Pentecostal, fundamentalist, evangelical, mainline, or liberal Protestant), we compare the two main approaches: the traditional "denominational" approach, where religious identities are assumed to be associated with religious denominations, and the subjective approach, where religious identities are assumed to be captured by a set of " nondenominational" reference categories linked to particular historical religious traditions or social movements. We conclude that both approaches have substantial predictive validity, and the most effective strategy for future research may be one that uses a combination of approaches, rather than one that relies entirely on a single method of measurement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845305444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845305444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/poq/nfl024

DO - 10.1093/poq/nfl024

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33845305444

VL - 70

SP - 530

EP - 564

JO - Public Opinion Quarterly

JF - Public Opinion Quarterly

SN - 0033-362X

IS - 4

ER -

Alwin DF, Felson JL, Walker ET, Tufiş PA. Measuring religious identities in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2006 Dec 1;70(4):530-564. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl024