Mechanical properties of the human heel pad

A comparison between populations

John Henry Challis, Chloe Murdoch, Samantha L. Winter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the heel pad mechanical properties of runners, who repetitively load the heel pad during training, with cyclists who do not load their heel pads during training. Ten competitive long distance runners and 10 competitive cyclists volunteered for this study. The thickness of the unloaded heel pad was measured using real-time B-mode ultrasonography. A heel pad indentation device was used to measure the mechanical properties of the heel pads. To evaluate the differences between the two groups, in heel pad properties, a repeat measures analysis of variance was used (p < .05). Heel pad thickness was not different between groups when normalized with respect to subject height. There was no significant difference between the groups in percentage energy loss during loading and unloading (runners: 61.4% ± 8.6; cyclists: 62.5% ± 4.6). Heel pad stiffness for the runners was statistically significantly less than that of the cyclists (p = .0018; runners: 17.1 N·mm-1 ± 3.0; cyclists: 20.4 N·mm -1 ± 4.0). These results indicate that the nature of the activity undertaken by individuals may influence their heel pad properties. This finding may be important when considering differences in heel pad properties between different populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)377-381
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of applied biomechanics
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Heel
Population
Ultrasonography
Analysis of Variance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{be2ea29da8d44f348a6320c4902f1f6f,
title = "Mechanical properties of the human heel pad: A comparison between populations",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare the heel pad mechanical properties of runners, who repetitively load the heel pad during training, with cyclists who do not load their heel pads during training. Ten competitive long distance runners and 10 competitive cyclists volunteered for this study. The thickness of the unloaded heel pad was measured using real-time B-mode ultrasonography. A heel pad indentation device was used to measure the mechanical properties of the heel pads. To evaluate the differences between the two groups, in heel pad properties, a repeat measures analysis of variance was used (p < .05). Heel pad thickness was not different between groups when normalized with respect to subject height. There was no significant difference between the groups in percentage energy loss during loading and unloading (runners: 61.4{\%} ± 8.6; cyclists: 62.5{\%} ± 4.6). Heel pad stiffness for the runners was statistically significantly less than that of the cyclists (p = .0018; runners: 17.1 N·mm-1 ± 3.0; cyclists: 20.4 N·mm -1 ± 4.0). These results indicate that the nature of the activity undertaken by individuals may influence their heel pad properties. This finding may be important when considering differences in heel pad properties between different populations.",
author = "Challis, {John Henry} and Chloe Murdoch and Winter, {Samantha L.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1123/jab.24.4.377",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "377--381",
journal = "Journal of Applied Biomechanics",
issn = "1065-8483",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Mechanical properties of the human heel pad : A comparison between populations. / Challis, John Henry; Murdoch, Chloe; Winter, Samantha L.

In: Journal of applied biomechanics, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.01.2008, p. 377-381.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanical properties of the human heel pad

T2 - A comparison between populations

AU - Challis, John Henry

AU - Murdoch, Chloe

AU - Winter, Samantha L.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the heel pad mechanical properties of runners, who repetitively load the heel pad during training, with cyclists who do not load their heel pads during training. Ten competitive long distance runners and 10 competitive cyclists volunteered for this study. The thickness of the unloaded heel pad was measured using real-time B-mode ultrasonography. A heel pad indentation device was used to measure the mechanical properties of the heel pads. To evaluate the differences between the two groups, in heel pad properties, a repeat measures analysis of variance was used (p < .05). Heel pad thickness was not different between groups when normalized with respect to subject height. There was no significant difference between the groups in percentage energy loss during loading and unloading (runners: 61.4% ± 8.6; cyclists: 62.5% ± 4.6). Heel pad stiffness for the runners was statistically significantly less than that of the cyclists (p = .0018; runners: 17.1 N·mm-1 ± 3.0; cyclists: 20.4 N·mm -1 ± 4.0). These results indicate that the nature of the activity undertaken by individuals may influence their heel pad properties. This finding may be important when considering differences in heel pad properties between different populations.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the heel pad mechanical properties of runners, who repetitively load the heel pad during training, with cyclists who do not load their heel pads during training. Ten competitive long distance runners and 10 competitive cyclists volunteered for this study. The thickness of the unloaded heel pad was measured using real-time B-mode ultrasonography. A heel pad indentation device was used to measure the mechanical properties of the heel pads. To evaluate the differences between the two groups, in heel pad properties, a repeat measures analysis of variance was used (p < .05). Heel pad thickness was not different between groups when normalized with respect to subject height. There was no significant difference between the groups in percentage energy loss during loading and unloading (runners: 61.4% ± 8.6; cyclists: 62.5% ± 4.6). Heel pad stiffness for the runners was statistically significantly less than that of the cyclists (p = .0018; runners: 17.1 N·mm-1 ± 3.0; cyclists: 20.4 N·mm -1 ± 4.0). These results indicate that the nature of the activity undertaken by individuals may influence their heel pad properties. This finding may be important when considering differences in heel pad properties between different populations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55849135793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55849135793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/jab.24.4.377

DO - 10.1123/jab.24.4.377

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 377

EP - 381

JO - Journal of Applied Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Applied Biomechanics

SN - 1065-8483

IS - 4

ER -