Media framing of capital punishment and its impact on individuals' cognitive responses

Frank E. Dardis, Frank R. Baumgartner, Amber E. Boydstun, Suzanna de Boef, Fuyuan Shen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is well known that mass media have the ability to frame a sociopolitical issue in specific ways, which can have considerable impact on the public's thoughts and perceptions regarding the issue. Through analyzing coverage of capital punishment in the New York Times since 1960 and then conducting an experiment in which we assessed individual-level responses to differently framed news stories, we show (a) the dramatic emergence of a new "innocence frame" within the past 10 years that accentuates imperfections in the justice system, and (b) the much greater impact of this frame on individuals' thoughts-in particular on those who favor the death penalty-when compared to the traditional morality-based frame. We suggest that the latter finding can be explained because individuals tend to resist changing their interpretations of issues based on arguments that contradict their core moral or religious beliefs; however, they seem quite receptive to new information along dimensions that they previously had not considered. This research also implies that U.S. trends toward lower sentencing rates and eventual public opinion changes are likely to continue as long as media and public discussion remains focused on questions regarding flaws in the justice system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)115-140
Number of pages26
JournalMass Communication and Society
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008

Fingerprint

penalty
Defects
justice
death penalty
mass media
morality
public opinion
news
coverage
interpretation
Experiments
experiment
ability
trend

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication

Cite this

@article{860fec8046f746e184126b1a3beb2e5c,
title = "Media framing of capital punishment and its impact on individuals' cognitive responses",
abstract = "It is well known that mass media have the ability to frame a sociopolitical issue in specific ways, which can have considerable impact on the public's thoughts and perceptions regarding the issue. Through analyzing coverage of capital punishment in the New York Times since 1960 and then conducting an experiment in which we assessed individual-level responses to differently framed news stories, we show (a) the dramatic emergence of a new {"}innocence frame{"} within the past 10 years that accentuates imperfections in the justice system, and (b) the much greater impact of this frame on individuals' thoughts-in particular on those who favor the death penalty-when compared to the traditional morality-based frame. We suggest that the latter finding can be explained because individuals tend to resist changing their interpretations of issues based on arguments that contradict their core moral or religious beliefs; however, they seem quite receptive to new information along dimensions that they previously had not considered. This research also implies that U.S. trends toward lower sentencing rates and eventual public opinion changes are likely to continue as long as media and public discussion remains focused on questions regarding flaws in the justice system.",
author = "Dardis, {Frank E.} and Baumgartner, {Frank R.} and Boydstun, {Amber E.} and {de Boef}, Suzanna and Fuyuan Shen",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15205430701580524",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "115--140",
journal = "Mass Communication and Society",
issn = "1520-5436",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Media framing of capital punishment and its impact on individuals' cognitive responses. / Dardis, Frank E.; Baumgartner, Frank R.; Boydstun, Amber E.; de Boef, Suzanna; Shen, Fuyuan.

In: Mass Communication and Society, Vol. 11, No. 2, 01.12.2008, p. 115-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Media framing of capital punishment and its impact on individuals' cognitive responses

AU - Dardis, Frank E.

AU - Baumgartner, Frank R.

AU - Boydstun, Amber E.

AU - de Boef, Suzanna

AU - Shen, Fuyuan

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - It is well known that mass media have the ability to frame a sociopolitical issue in specific ways, which can have considerable impact on the public's thoughts and perceptions regarding the issue. Through analyzing coverage of capital punishment in the New York Times since 1960 and then conducting an experiment in which we assessed individual-level responses to differently framed news stories, we show (a) the dramatic emergence of a new "innocence frame" within the past 10 years that accentuates imperfections in the justice system, and (b) the much greater impact of this frame on individuals' thoughts-in particular on those who favor the death penalty-when compared to the traditional morality-based frame. We suggest that the latter finding can be explained because individuals tend to resist changing their interpretations of issues based on arguments that contradict their core moral or religious beliefs; however, they seem quite receptive to new information along dimensions that they previously had not considered. This research also implies that U.S. trends toward lower sentencing rates and eventual public opinion changes are likely to continue as long as media and public discussion remains focused on questions regarding flaws in the justice system.

AB - It is well known that mass media have the ability to frame a sociopolitical issue in specific ways, which can have considerable impact on the public's thoughts and perceptions regarding the issue. Through analyzing coverage of capital punishment in the New York Times since 1960 and then conducting an experiment in which we assessed individual-level responses to differently framed news stories, we show (a) the dramatic emergence of a new "innocence frame" within the past 10 years that accentuates imperfections in the justice system, and (b) the much greater impact of this frame on individuals' thoughts-in particular on those who favor the death penalty-when compared to the traditional morality-based frame. We suggest that the latter finding can be explained because individuals tend to resist changing their interpretations of issues based on arguments that contradict their core moral or religious beliefs; however, they seem quite receptive to new information along dimensions that they previously had not considered. This research also implies that U.S. trends toward lower sentencing rates and eventual public opinion changes are likely to continue as long as media and public discussion remains focused on questions regarding flaws in the justice system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57749128627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57749128627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15205430701580524

DO - 10.1080/15205430701580524

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:57749128627

VL - 11

SP - 115

EP - 140

JO - Mass Communication and Society

JF - Mass Communication and Society

SN - 1520-5436

IS - 2

ER -