Medical student views on the use of Facebook profile screening by residency admissions committees

Daniel George, Michael Green, Anita M. Navarro, Kelly K. Stazyk, Melissa A. Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Previous research has shown that >50% of residency programmes indicate that inappropriate Facebook postings could be grounds for rejecting a student applicant. This study sought to understand medical students' views regarding the impact of their Facebook postings on the residency admissions process. Study design In 2011-2012, we conducted a national survey of 7144 randomly selected medical students representing 10% of current enrollees in US medical schools. Students were presented with a hypothetical scenario of a residency admissions committee searching Facebook and finding inappropriate pictures of a student, and were asked how the committee ought to regard these pictures. Results The response rate was 30% (2109/7144). Respondents did not differ from medical students nationally with regard to type of medical school and regional representation. Of the three options provided, the majority of respondents (63.5%) indicated 'the pictures should be considered along with other factors, but should not be grounds for automatic rejection of the application'. A third (33.7%) believed 'the pictures should have no bearing on my application; the pictures are irrelevant'. A small minority of respondents (2.8%) felt 'the pictures should be grounds for automatic rejection of the application'. Conclusions That the views of students regarding the consequences of their online activity differ so greatly from the views of residency admissions committees speaks to the need for better communication between these parties. It also presents opportunities for medical schools to help students in their residency application process by increasing awareness of social media screening strategies used by some residency programmes, and fostering self-awareness around the use of social media during medical school and especially during the residency application process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-253
Number of pages3
JournalPostgraduate Medical Journal
Volume90
Issue number1063
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Medical Students
Medical Schools
Students
Social Media
Foster Home Care
Communication
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

George, Daniel ; Green, Michael ; Navarro, Anita M. ; Stazyk, Kelly K. ; Clark, Melissa A. / Medical student views on the use of Facebook profile screening by residency admissions committees. In: Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2014 ; Vol. 90, No. 1063. pp. 251-253.
@article{c620727301f24f3a8ae898f4675287d7,
title = "Medical student views on the use of Facebook profile screening by residency admissions committees",
abstract = "Purpose Previous research has shown that >50{\%} of residency programmes indicate that inappropriate Facebook postings could be grounds for rejecting a student applicant. This study sought to understand medical students' views regarding the impact of their Facebook postings on the residency admissions process. Study design In 2011-2012, we conducted a national survey of 7144 randomly selected medical students representing 10{\%} of current enrollees in US medical schools. Students were presented with a hypothetical scenario of a residency admissions committee searching Facebook and finding inappropriate pictures of a student, and were asked how the committee ought to regard these pictures. Results The response rate was 30{\%} (2109/7144). Respondents did not differ from medical students nationally with regard to type of medical school and regional representation. Of the three options provided, the majority of respondents (63.5{\%}) indicated 'the pictures should be considered along with other factors, but should not be grounds for automatic rejection of the application'. A third (33.7{\%}) believed 'the pictures should have no bearing on my application; the pictures are irrelevant'. A small minority of respondents (2.8{\%}) felt 'the pictures should be grounds for automatic rejection of the application'. Conclusions That the views of students regarding the consequences of their online activity differ so greatly from the views of residency admissions committees speaks to the need for better communication between these parties. It also presents opportunities for medical schools to help students in their residency application process by increasing awareness of social media screening strategies used by some residency programmes, and fostering self-awareness around the use of social media during medical school and especially during the residency application process.",
author = "Daniel George and Michael Green and Navarro, {Anita M.} and Stazyk, {Kelly K.} and Clark, {Melissa A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-132336",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "251--253",
journal = "Postgraduate Medical Journal",
issn = "0032-5473",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1063",

}

Medical student views on the use of Facebook profile screening by residency admissions committees. / George, Daniel; Green, Michael; Navarro, Anita M.; Stazyk, Kelly K.; Clark, Melissa A.

In: Postgraduate Medical Journal, Vol. 90, No. 1063, 01.01.2014, p. 251-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical student views on the use of Facebook profile screening by residency admissions committees

AU - George, Daniel

AU - Green, Michael

AU - Navarro, Anita M.

AU - Stazyk, Kelly K.

AU - Clark, Melissa A.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Purpose Previous research has shown that >50% of residency programmes indicate that inappropriate Facebook postings could be grounds for rejecting a student applicant. This study sought to understand medical students' views regarding the impact of their Facebook postings on the residency admissions process. Study design In 2011-2012, we conducted a national survey of 7144 randomly selected medical students representing 10% of current enrollees in US medical schools. Students were presented with a hypothetical scenario of a residency admissions committee searching Facebook and finding inappropriate pictures of a student, and were asked how the committee ought to regard these pictures. Results The response rate was 30% (2109/7144). Respondents did not differ from medical students nationally with regard to type of medical school and regional representation. Of the three options provided, the majority of respondents (63.5%) indicated 'the pictures should be considered along with other factors, but should not be grounds for automatic rejection of the application'. A third (33.7%) believed 'the pictures should have no bearing on my application; the pictures are irrelevant'. A small minority of respondents (2.8%) felt 'the pictures should be grounds for automatic rejection of the application'. Conclusions That the views of students regarding the consequences of their online activity differ so greatly from the views of residency admissions committees speaks to the need for better communication between these parties. It also presents opportunities for medical schools to help students in their residency application process by increasing awareness of social media screening strategies used by some residency programmes, and fostering self-awareness around the use of social media during medical school and especially during the residency application process.

AB - Purpose Previous research has shown that >50% of residency programmes indicate that inappropriate Facebook postings could be grounds for rejecting a student applicant. This study sought to understand medical students' views regarding the impact of their Facebook postings on the residency admissions process. Study design In 2011-2012, we conducted a national survey of 7144 randomly selected medical students representing 10% of current enrollees in US medical schools. Students were presented with a hypothetical scenario of a residency admissions committee searching Facebook and finding inappropriate pictures of a student, and were asked how the committee ought to regard these pictures. Results The response rate was 30% (2109/7144). Respondents did not differ from medical students nationally with regard to type of medical school and regional representation. Of the three options provided, the majority of respondents (63.5%) indicated 'the pictures should be considered along with other factors, but should not be grounds for automatic rejection of the application'. A third (33.7%) believed 'the pictures should have no bearing on my application; the pictures are irrelevant'. A small minority of respondents (2.8%) felt 'the pictures should be grounds for automatic rejection of the application'. Conclusions That the views of students regarding the consequences of their online activity differ so greatly from the views of residency admissions committees speaks to the need for better communication between these parties. It also presents opportunities for medical schools to help students in their residency application process by increasing awareness of social media screening strategies used by some residency programmes, and fostering self-awareness around the use of social media during medical school and especially during the residency application process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898769467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898769467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-132336

DO - 10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-132336

M3 - Article

C2 - 24578513

AN - SCOPUS:84898769467

VL - 90

SP - 251

EP - 253

JO - Postgraduate Medical Journal

JF - Postgraduate Medical Journal

SN - 0032-5473

IS - 1063

ER -