Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: Evidence from interference effects

Simon Lacey, Christine Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two experiments used visual-, verbal-, and haptic-interference tasks during encoding (Experiment 1) and retrieval (Experiment 2) to examine mental representation of familiar and unfamiliar objects in visual/haptic crossmodal memory. Three competing theories are discussed, which variously suggest that these representations are: (a) visual; (b) dual-code - visual for unfamiliar objects but visual and verbal for familiar objects; or (c) amodal. The results suggest that representations of unfamiliar objects are primarily visual but that crossmodal memory for familiar objects may rely on a network of different representations. The pattern of verbal-interference effects suggests that verbal strategies facilitate encoding of unfamiliar objects regardless of modality, but only haptic recognition regardless of familiarity. The results raise further research questions about all three theoretical approaches.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)361-376
Number of pages16
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2006

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physiology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Mental representation in visual/haptic crossmodal memory: Evidence from interference effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this