Metagenomic analysis of planktonic microbial consortia from a non-tidal urbanimpacted segment of James River

Bonnie L. Brown, Rebecca V. LePrell, Rima B. Franklin, Maria C. Rivera, Francine M. Cabral, Hugh L. Eaves, Vicki Gardiakos, Kevin P. Keegan, Timothy L. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Knowledge of the diversity and ecological function of the microbial consortia of James River in Virginia, USA, is essential to developing a more complete understanding of the ecology of this model river system. Metagenomic analysis of James River's planktonic microbial community was performed for the first time using an unamplified genomic library and a 16S rDNA amplicon library prepared and sequenced by Ion PGM and MiSeq, respectively. From the 0.46-Gb WGS library (GenBank:SRR1146621; MG-RAST:4532156.3), 4 × 106 reads revealed > 3 × 106 genes, 240 families of prokaryotes, and 155 families of eukaryotes. From the 0.68-Gb 16S library (GenBank:SRR2124995; MG-RAST:4631271.3; EMB:2184), 4 × 106 reads revealed 259 families of eubacteria. Results of the WGS and 16S analyses were highly consistent and indicated that more than half of the bacterial sequences were Proteobacteria, predominantly Comamonadaceae. The most numerous genera in this group were Acidovorax (including iron oxidizers, nitrotolulene degraders, and plant pathogens), which accounted for 10 % of assigned bacterial reads. Polaromonas were another 6 % of all bacterial reads, with many assignments to groups capable of degrading polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Albidiferax (iron reducers) and Variovorax (biodegraders of a variety of natural biogenic compounds as well as anthropogenic contaminants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and endocrine disruptors) each accounted for an additional 3 % of bacterial reads. Comparison of these data to other publically-available aquatic metagenomes revealed that this stretch of James River is highly similar to the upper Mississippi River, and that these river systems are more similar to aquaculture and sludge ecosystems than they are to lakes or to a pristine section of the upper Amazon River. Taken together, these analyses exposed previously unknown aspects of microbial biodiversity, documented the ecological responses of microbes to urban effects, and revealed the noteworthy presence of 22 human-pathogenic bacterial genera (e.g., Enterobacteriaceae, pathogenic Pseudomonadaceae, and 'Vibrionales') and 6 pathogenic eukaryotic genera (e.g., Trypanosomatidae and Vahlkampfiidae). This information about pathogen diversity may be used to promote human epidemiological studies, enhance existing water quality monitoring efforts, and increase awareness of the possible health risks associated with recreational use of James River.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number65
JournalStandards in Genomic Sciences
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 19 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Genetics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Metagenomic analysis of planktonic microbial consortia from a non-tidal urbanimpacted segment of James River'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Brown, B. L., LePrell, R. V., Franklin, R. B., Rivera, M. C., Cabral, F. M., Eaves, H. L., Gardiakos, V., Keegan, K. P., & King, T. L. (2015). Metagenomic analysis of planktonic microbial consortia from a non-tidal urbanimpacted segment of James River. Standards in Genomic Sciences, 10(1), [65]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-015-0062-5