Metaphorical Character of Moral Cognition

A Comparative and Decompositional Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article studies the moral metaphor system focusing on a subsystem consisting of five pairs of MORAL and IMMORAL metaphors whose source concepts represent some contrastive categories in our visual experience: WHITE and BLACK, LIGHT and DARK, CLEAR and MURKY, CLEAN and DIRTY, PURE and IMPURE. The study examines whether these moral metaphors are manifested in Chinese and English, looking for linguistic evidence in both languages. It is found that the studied moral metaphors are applicable in both languages at varying degrees. This finding suggests that these metaphors may range from being widespread to being universal. The study then further analyzes them regarding whether they are primary or complex metaphors and whether they are equal in status, applying a decompositional approach to metaphor analysis. The result suggests that the moral metaphors under study are complex rather than primary metaphors, and that they are actually not equal in status, some depending on others in meaning making in our moral cognition. If the analysis is valid, the implications are: some conceptual metaphors are more fundamental than others, those that are more fundamental are more likely to be widespread or universal, and hypotheses can be made about conceptual metaphors based on in-depth analysis of their conceptual composition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)163-183
Number of pages21
JournalMetaphor and Symbol
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Metaphor
Linguistics
Cognition
cognition
metaphor
Chemical analysis
Language
language
subsystem

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Communication
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{96f4049cfe44477da11dbdbc67fabeae,
title = "Metaphorical Character of Moral Cognition: A Comparative and Decompositional Analysis",
abstract = "This article studies the moral metaphor system focusing on a subsystem consisting of five pairs of MORAL and IMMORAL metaphors whose source concepts represent some contrastive categories in our visual experience: WHITE and BLACK, LIGHT and DARK, CLEAR and MURKY, CLEAN and DIRTY, PURE and IMPURE. The study examines whether these moral metaphors are manifested in Chinese and English, looking for linguistic evidence in both languages. It is found that the studied moral metaphors are applicable in both languages at varying degrees. This finding suggests that these metaphors may range from being widespread to being universal. The study then further analyzes them regarding whether they are primary or complex metaphors and whether they are equal in status, applying a decompositional approach to metaphor analysis. The result suggests that the moral metaphors under study are complex rather than primary metaphors, and that they are actually not equal in status, some depending on others in meaning making in our moral cognition. If the analysis is valid, the implications are: some conceptual metaphors are more fundamental than others, those that are more fundamental are more likely to be widespread or universal, and hypotheses can be made about conceptual metaphors based on in-depth analysis of their conceptual composition.",
author = "Ning Yu",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10926488.2015.1049500",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "163--183",
journal = "Metaphor and Symbol",
issn = "1092-6488",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Metaphorical Character of Moral Cognition : A Comparative and Decompositional Analysis. / Yu, Ning.

In: Metaphor and Symbol, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.01.2015, p. 163-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metaphorical Character of Moral Cognition

T2 - A Comparative and Decompositional Analysis

AU - Yu, Ning

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - This article studies the moral metaphor system focusing on a subsystem consisting of five pairs of MORAL and IMMORAL metaphors whose source concepts represent some contrastive categories in our visual experience: WHITE and BLACK, LIGHT and DARK, CLEAR and MURKY, CLEAN and DIRTY, PURE and IMPURE. The study examines whether these moral metaphors are manifested in Chinese and English, looking for linguistic evidence in both languages. It is found that the studied moral metaphors are applicable in both languages at varying degrees. This finding suggests that these metaphors may range from being widespread to being universal. The study then further analyzes them regarding whether they are primary or complex metaphors and whether they are equal in status, applying a decompositional approach to metaphor analysis. The result suggests that the moral metaphors under study are complex rather than primary metaphors, and that they are actually not equal in status, some depending on others in meaning making in our moral cognition. If the analysis is valid, the implications are: some conceptual metaphors are more fundamental than others, those that are more fundamental are more likely to be widespread or universal, and hypotheses can be made about conceptual metaphors based on in-depth analysis of their conceptual composition.

AB - This article studies the moral metaphor system focusing on a subsystem consisting of five pairs of MORAL and IMMORAL metaphors whose source concepts represent some contrastive categories in our visual experience: WHITE and BLACK, LIGHT and DARK, CLEAR and MURKY, CLEAN and DIRTY, PURE and IMPURE. The study examines whether these moral metaphors are manifested in Chinese and English, looking for linguistic evidence in both languages. It is found that the studied moral metaphors are applicable in both languages at varying degrees. This finding suggests that these metaphors may range from being widespread to being universal. The study then further analyzes them regarding whether they are primary or complex metaphors and whether they are equal in status, applying a decompositional approach to metaphor analysis. The result suggests that the moral metaphors under study are complex rather than primary metaphors, and that they are actually not equal in status, some depending on others in meaning making in our moral cognition. If the analysis is valid, the implications are: some conceptual metaphors are more fundamental than others, those that are more fundamental are more likely to be widespread or universal, and hypotheses can be made about conceptual metaphors based on in-depth analysis of their conceptual composition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937428266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937428266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10926488.2015.1049500

DO - 10.1080/10926488.2015.1049500

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 163

EP - 183

JO - Metaphor and Symbol

JF - Metaphor and Symbol

SN - 1092-6488

IS - 3

ER -