Metapodial or phalanx? An evolutionary and developmental perspective on the homology of the first ray's proximal segment

Philip L. Reno, Walter E. Horton, C. Owen Lovejoy

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

The first mammalian metapodial (MP1) has periodically been argued to actually be a phalanx, because the first ray has one less element than the four posterior rays, and because the MP1 growth plate is proximal like those of all phalanges, rather than distal as in metapodials 2-5. However, growth plates are formed at both ends in non-therian tetrapod metapodials, and phylogenetic analysis demonstrates that growth plate loss is a therian synapomorphy that postdates the establishment of the mammalian phalangeal formula. These data, along with results of developmental and morphological studies, suggest that the MP1 is not a phalanx. The singular, proximal growth plates in MPs 2-5 are likely to be an adaptation to dynamic erect quadrupedal gait which was characterized by conversion of the posterior metapodials into rigid struts with the carpus/tarsus. While the adaptive significance of the reversed ossification of MP1 is less clear, we present three functional/developmental hypotheses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)276-285
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
Volume320
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Molecular Medicine
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Genetics
  • Developmental Biology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Metapodial or phalanx? An evolutionary and developmental perspective on the homology of the first ray's proximal segment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this