Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing

Stephen G. Osborn, Avner Vengosh, Nathaniel Richard Warner, Robert B. Jackson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

752 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Directional drilling and hydraulic-fracturing technologies are dramatically increasing natural-gas extraction. In aquifers overlying the Marcellus and Utica shale formations of northeastern Pennsylvania and upstate New York, we document systematic evidence for methane contamination of drinking water associated with shalegas extraction. In active gas-extraction areas (one or more gas wells within 1 km), average and maximum methane concentrations in drinking-water wells increased with proximity to the nearest gas well and were 19.2 and 64 mg CH4 L-1 (n = 26), a potential explosion hazard; in contrast, dissolved methane samples in neighboring nonextraction sites (no gas wells within 1 km) within similar geologic formations and hydrogeologic regimes averaged only 1.1 mgL-1 (P < 0.05; n = 34). Average δ13C-CH4 values of dissolved methane in shallow groundwater were significantly less negative for active than for nonactive sites (-37 ± 7‰ and -54 ± 11‰, respectively; P < 0.0001). These δ13C-CH4 data, coupled with the ratios of methane-to-higher-chain hydrocarbons, and δ2H- CH4 values, are consistent with deeper thermogenic methane sources such as the Marcellus and Utica shales at the active sites and matched gas geochemistry from gas wells nearby. In contrast, lower-concentration samples from shallow groundwater at nonactive sites had isotopic signatures reflecting a more biogenic or mixed biogenic/ thermogenic methane source. We found no evidence for contamination of drinking-water samples with deep saline brines or fracturing fluids. We conclude that greater stewardship, data, and - possibly - regulation are needed to ensure the sustainable future of shale-gas extraction and to improve public confidence in its use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8172-8176
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume108
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - May 17 2011

Fingerprint

Oil and Gas Fields
Methane
Drinking Water
Groundwater
Natural Gas
Catalytic Domain
Water Wells
Gases
Explosions
Hydrocarbons
Hydraulic Fracking
Technology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General

Cite this

@article{22872649a897403c987462ae456b6294,
title = "Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing",
abstract = "Directional drilling and hydraulic-fracturing technologies are dramatically increasing natural-gas extraction. In aquifers overlying the Marcellus and Utica shale formations of northeastern Pennsylvania and upstate New York, we document systematic evidence for methane contamination of drinking water associated with shalegas extraction. In active gas-extraction areas (one or more gas wells within 1 km), average and maximum methane concentrations in drinking-water wells increased with proximity to the nearest gas well and were 19.2 and 64 mg CH4 L-1 (n = 26), a potential explosion hazard; in contrast, dissolved methane samples in neighboring nonextraction sites (no gas wells within 1 km) within similar geologic formations and hydrogeologic regimes averaged only 1.1 mgL-1 (P < 0.05; n = 34). Average δ13C-CH4 values of dissolved methane in shallow groundwater were significantly less negative for active than for nonactive sites (-37 ± 7‰ and -54 ± 11‰, respectively; P < 0.0001). These δ13C-CH4 data, coupled with the ratios of methane-to-higher-chain hydrocarbons, and δ2H- CH4 values, are consistent with deeper thermogenic methane sources such as the Marcellus and Utica shales at the active sites and matched gas geochemistry from gas wells nearby. In contrast, lower-concentration samples from shallow groundwater at nonactive sites had isotopic signatures reflecting a more biogenic or mixed biogenic/ thermogenic methane source. We found no evidence for contamination of drinking-water samples with deep saline brines or fracturing fluids. We conclude that greater stewardship, data, and - possibly - regulation are needed to ensure the sustainable future of shale-gas extraction and to improve public confidence in its use.",
author = "Osborn, {Stephen G.} and Avner Vengosh and Warner, {Nathaniel Richard} and Jackson, {Robert B.}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1100682108",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "8172--8176",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "20",

}

Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. / Osborn, Stephen G.; Vengosh, Avner; Warner, Nathaniel Richard; Jackson, Robert B.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 108, No. 20, 17.05.2011, p. 8172-8176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing

AU - Osborn, Stephen G.

AU - Vengosh, Avner

AU - Warner, Nathaniel Richard

AU - Jackson, Robert B.

PY - 2011/5/17

Y1 - 2011/5/17

N2 - Directional drilling and hydraulic-fracturing technologies are dramatically increasing natural-gas extraction. In aquifers overlying the Marcellus and Utica shale formations of northeastern Pennsylvania and upstate New York, we document systematic evidence for methane contamination of drinking water associated with shalegas extraction. In active gas-extraction areas (one or more gas wells within 1 km), average and maximum methane concentrations in drinking-water wells increased with proximity to the nearest gas well and were 19.2 and 64 mg CH4 L-1 (n = 26), a potential explosion hazard; in contrast, dissolved methane samples in neighboring nonextraction sites (no gas wells within 1 km) within similar geologic formations and hydrogeologic regimes averaged only 1.1 mgL-1 (P < 0.05; n = 34). Average δ13C-CH4 values of dissolved methane in shallow groundwater were significantly less negative for active than for nonactive sites (-37 ± 7‰ and -54 ± 11‰, respectively; P < 0.0001). These δ13C-CH4 data, coupled with the ratios of methane-to-higher-chain hydrocarbons, and δ2H- CH4 values, are consistent with deeper thermogenic methane sources such as the Marcellus and Utica shales at the active sites and matched gas geochemistry from gas wells nearby. In contrast, lower-concentration samples from shallow groundwater at nonactive sites had isotopic signatures reflecting a more biogenic or mixed biogenic/ thermogenic methane source. We found no evidence for contamination of drinking-water samples with deep saline brines or fracturing fluids. We conclude that greater stewardship, data, and - possibly - regulation are needed to ensure the sustainable future of shale-gas extraction and to improve public confidence in its use.

AB - Directional drilling and hydraulic-fracturing technologies are dramatically increasing natural-gas extraction. In aquifers overlying the Marcellus and Utica shale formations of northeastern Pennsylvania and upstate New York, we document systematic evidence for methane contamination of drinking water associated with shalegas extraction. In active gas-extraction areas (one or more gas wells within 1 km), average and maximum methane concentrations in drinking-water wells increased with proximity to the nearest gas well and were 19.2 and 64 mg CH4 L-1 (n = 26), a potential explosion hazard; in contrast, dissolved methane samples in neighboring nonextraction sites (no gas wells within 1 km) within similar geologic formations and hydrogeologic regimes averaged only 1.1 mgL-1 (P < 0.05; n = 34). Average δ13C-CH4 values of dissolved methane in shallow groundwater were significantly less negative for active than for nonactive sites (-37 ± 7‰ and -54 ± 11‰, respectively; P < 0.0001). These δ13C-CH4 data, coupled with the ratios of methane-to-higher-chain hydrocarbons, and δ2H- CH4 values, are consistent with deeper thermogenic methane sources such as the Marcellus and Utica shales at the active sites and matched gas geochemistry from gas wells nearby. In contrast, lower-concentration samples from shallow groundwater at nonactive sites had isotopic signatures reflecting a more biogenic or mixed biogenic/ thermogenic methane source. We found no evidence for contamination of drinking-water samples with deep saline brines or fracturing fluids. We conclude that greater stewardship, data, and - possibly - regulation are needed to ensure the sustainable future of shale-gas extraction and to improve public confidence in its use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957725164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957725164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1100682108

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1100682108

M3 - Article

C2 - 21555547

AN - SCOPUS:79957725164

VL - 108

SP - 8172

EP - 8176

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 20

ER -