TY - JOUR
T1 - Methane Emissions from the Marcellus Shale in Southwestern Pennsylvania and Northern West Virginia Based on Airborne Measurements
AU - Ren, Xinrong
AU - Hall, Dolly L.
AU - Vinciguerra, Timothy
AU - Benish, Sarah E.
AU - Stratton, Philip R.
AU - Ahn, Doyeon
AU - Hansford, Jonathan R.
AU - Cohen, Mark D.
AU - Sahu, Sayantan
AU - He, Hao
AU - Grimes, Courtney
AU - Fuentes, Jose D.
AU - Shepson, Paul B.
AU - Salawitch, Ross J.
AU - Ehrman, Sheryl H.
AU - Dickerson, Russell R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by National Science Foundation (NSF grant CBET-1438400), Maryland Department of Environment (MDE contract U00P4401029), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST Cooperative Agreement 70NANB14H333), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) AQAST program. The authors thank the flight crew at University Research Foundation (URF), Greenbelt, MD, for their support to conduct flights and Winston Luke and Paul Kelley at NOAA Air Resources Laboratory for their technical support. The authors thank Maryland Department of Environment's Air Toxics and PAMS Analytical Laboratory, especially Acefaw Belay and David Krask for their support to analyze VOC samples, and Jerry Rhoderick, Bob Miller, and Kimberly Schuldt at NIST for certification of CH4 and CO2 standards. The authors specially thank Zachary Barkley, Thomas Lauvaux, and Kenneth Davis at Pennsylvania State University for their help to identify the aircraft wind bias and for providing the WRF wind data and helpful comments. The authors also thank Anna Karion at NIST, Olivia Salmon at Purdue University, Dana Caulton at Princeton University, Joannes Maasakkers at Harvard University, Colm Sweeney at NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory for providing helpful comments and discussion, and Alexia Chittams and Rahma Zakaria at University of Maryland for their help to gather gas well data. We also appreciate the three detailed, thoughtful reviews that improved the paper. Data used in this study are available at http://www.atmos.umd.edu/~rammpp/archives/ArchiveFlightData.html. The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any views or opinions expressed herein, are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of NSF, MDE, NIST, NOAA, and NASA.
Publisher Copyright:
©2019. The Authors.
PY - 2019/2/16
Y1 - 2019/2/16
N2 - Natural gas production in the United States has increased rapidly over the past decade, along with concerns about methane (CH 4 ) fugitive emissions and its climate impacts. Quantification of CH 4 emissions from oil and natural gas (O&NG) operations is important for establishing scientifically sound policies for mitigating greenhouse gases. We use the aircraft mass balance approach for three flight experiments in August and September 2015 to estimate CH 4 emissions from O&NG operations over the southwestern Marcellus Shale. We estimate a mean CH 4 emission rate as 21.2 kg/s with 28% coming from O&NG operations. The mean CH 4 emission rate from O&NG operations was estimated to be 1.1% of total NG production. The individual best-estimate emission rates from the three flight experiments ranged from 0.78 to 1.5%, with overall limits of 0% and 3.5%. These emission rates are at the low end of other top-down studies, but consistent with the few observational studies in the Marcellus Shale region as well as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CH 4 inventory. A substantial source of CH 4 (~70% of observed CH 4 emissions) was found to contain little ethane, possibly due to coalbed CH 4 emitted either directly from coal mines or from wells drilled through coalbed layers in O&NG operations. Recent regulations requiring capture of gas from the completion-venting step of hydraulic fracturing appear to have reduced the atmospheric release of CH 4 . Our study suggests that for a 20-year time scale, energy derived from the combustion of natural gas extracted from this region likely exerts a net climate benefit compared to coal.
AB - Natural gas production in the United States has increased rapidly over the past decade, along with concerns about methane (CH 4 ) fugitive emissions and its climate impacts. Quantification of CH 4 emissions from oil and natural gas (O&NG) operations is important for establishing scientifically sound policies for mitigating greenhouse gases. We use the aircraft mass balance approach for three flight experiments in August and September 2015 to estimate CH 4 emissions from O&NG operations over the southwestern Marcellus Shale. We estimate a mean CH 4 emission rate as 21.2 kg/s with 28% coming from O&NG operations. The mean CH 4 emission rate from O&NG operations was estimated to be 1.1% of total NG production. The individual best-estimate emission rates from the three flight experiments ranged from 0.78 to 1.5%, with overall limits of 0% and 3.5%. These emission rates are at the low end of other top-down studies, but consistent with the few observational studies in the Marcellus Shale region as well as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CH 4 inventory. A substantial source of CH 4 (~70% of observed CH 4 emissions) was found to contain little ethane, possibly due to coalbed CH 4 emitted either directly from coal mines or from wells drilled through coalbed layers in O&NG operations. Recent regulations requiring capture of gas from the completion-venting step of hydraulic fracturing appear to have reduced the atmospheric release of CH 4 . Our study suggests that for a 20-year time scale, energy derived from the combustion of natural gas extracted from this region likely exerts a net climate benefit compared to coal.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061027330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061027330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2018JD029690
DO - 10.1029/2018JD029690
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85061027330
SN - 2169-897X
VL - 124
SP - 1862
EP - 1878
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
IS - 3
ER -