Methods Taught in Public Policy Programs: Are Quantitative Methods Still Prevalent?

Göktug˘ Morçöl, Nadezda P. Ivanova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a content analysis of the titles and descriptions of methods courses offered in 44 graduate programs in public policy at universities and colleges in the U. S., and compares the results to those of an earlier survey on the methodological preferences of policy professionals. The rationale for classifying methods courses as quantitative and qualitative and the results of the past research on methods courses are discussed. The results of the analyses show that quantitative methods are used in a large majority of the courses studied and that they are prevalent in the practice of policy professionals. The authors question whether the prevalence of a quantitative/positivist methodological approach in public policy programs and practice is a good match for the demands of today’s complex world of governance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-277
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Public Affairs Education
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2010

Fingerprint

quantitative method
public policy
content analysis
graduate
governance
university

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Public Administration

Cite this

@article{0bb337981b244be29db07eb77b202df1,
title = "Methods Taught in Public Policy Programs: Are Quantitative Methods Still Prevalent?",
abstract = "This paper presents the results of a content analysis of the titles and descriptions of methods courses offered in 44 graduate programs in public policy at universities and colleges in the U. S., and compares the results to those of an earlier survey on the methodological preferences of policy professionals. The rationale for classifying methods courses as quantitative and qualitative and the results of the past research on methods courses are discussed. The results of the analyses show that quantitative methods are used in a large majority of the courses studied and that they are prevalent in the practice of policy professionals. The authors question whether the prevalence of a quantitative/positivist methodological approach in public policy programs and practice is a good match for the demands of today’s complex world of governance.",
author = "G{\"o}ktug˘ Mor{\cc}{\"o}l and Ivanova, {Nadezda P.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15236803.2010.12001596",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "255--277",
journal = "Journal of Public Affairs Education",
issn = "1523-6803",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Methods Taught in Public Policy Programs : Are Quantitative Methods Still Prevalent? / Morçöl, Göktug˘; Ivanova, Nadezda P.

In: Journal of Public Affairs Education, Vol. 16, No. 2, 01.06.2010, p. 255-277.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methods Taught in Public Policy Programs

T2 - Are Quantitative Methods Still Prevalent?

AU - Morçöl, Göktug˘

AU - Ivanova, Nadezda P.

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - This paper presents the results of a content analysis of the titles and descriptions of methods courses offered in 44 graduate programs in public policy at universities and colleges in the U. S., and compares the results to those of an earlier survey on the methodological preferences of policy professionals. The rationale for classifying methods courses as quantitative and qualitative and the results of the past research on methods courses are discussed. The results of the analyses show that quantitative methods are used in a large majority of the courses studied and that they are prevalent in the practice of policy professionals. The authors question whether the prevalence of a quantitative/positivist methodological approach in public policy programs and practice is a good match for the demands of today’s complex world of governance.

AB - This paper presents the results of a content analysis of the titles and descriptions of methods courses offered in 44 graduate programs in public policy at universities and colleges in the U. S., and compares the results to those of an earlier survey on the methodological preferences of policy professionals. The rationale for classifying methods courses as quantitative and qualitative and the results of the past research on methods courses are discussed. The results of the analyses show that quantitative methods are used in a large majority of the courses studied and that they are prevalent in the practice of policy professionals. The authors question whether the prevalence of a quantitative/positivist methodological approach in public policy programs and practice is a good match for the demands of today’s complex world of governance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048996941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048996941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15236803.2010.12001596

DO - 10.1080/15236803.2010.12001596

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048996941

VL - 16

SP - 255

EP - 277

JO - Journal of Public Affairs Education

JF - Journal of Public Affairs Education

SN - 1523-6803

IS - 2

ER -