Metropolitan governance and business improvement districts

Goktug Morcol, Ulf Zimmermann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because of their growing numbers and the increasingly significant roles they play in providing urban services and influencing public policymaking, Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) have become a challenge to the conventional conception of public administration. Their origins lie in the United States' foundational privatism and the corporate origins of American governments. Many urban services were provided privately until the Progressive movement turned them into what has come to be known as public services. But between the privatization movement that began in and has been accelerating since the late 1970s and the academic advent of public choice theory, BIDs have arisen as a new form of "private government." As they expand their menus of services, often including land-use planning, and approaching more general-purpose government status, BIDs have begun to raise issues of accountability. This has become a problem for public administration theory, and there is a need to expand the notion of public administration to encompass these growing forms of governance. This article contends that the best way to capture the role of BIDs in the metropolitan governance process is network governance theory, which takes into account not only the many and various local governments but also the numerous nonprofit and for-profit organizations participating in this governance process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-29
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of Public Administration
Volume29
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

public administration
district
governance
administration theory
public choice
role play
privatization
public service
profit
land use
responsibility
planning
Business improvement districts
Metropolitan governance
Public Administration
Government
Governance
Network governance
Local government
Public policy making

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Public Administration

Cite this

@article{8be0802a63924b518c77d8d92cb87784,
title = "Metropolitan governance and business improvement districts",
abstract = "Because of their growing numbers and the increasingly significant roles they play in providing urban services and influencing public policymaking, Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) have become a challenge to the conventional conception of public administration. Their origins lie in the United States' foundational privatism and the corporate origins of American governments. Many urban services were provided privately until the Progressive movement turned them into what has come to be known as public services. But between the privatization movement that began in and has been accelerating since the late 1970s and the academic advent of public choice theory, BIDs have arisen as a new form of {"}private government.{"} As they expand their menus of services, often including land-use planning, and approaching more general-purpose government status, BIDs have begun to raise issues of accountability. This has become a problem for public administration theory, and there is a need to expand the notion of public administration to encompass these growing forms of governance. This article contends that the best way to capture the role of BIDs in the metropolitan governance process is network governance theory, which takes into account not only the many and various local governments but also the numerous nonprofit and for-profit organizations participating in this governance process.",
author = "Goktug Morcol and Ulf Zimmermann",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01900690500408965",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "5--29",
journal = "International Journal of Public Administration",
issn = "0190-0692",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1-3",

}

Metropolitan governance and business improvement districts. / Morcol, Goktug; Zimmermann, Ulf.

In: International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 29, No. 1-3, 01.01.2006, p. 5-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Metropolitan governance and business improvement districts

AU - Morcol, Goktug

AU - Zimmermann, Ulf

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Because of their growing numbers and the increasingly significant roles they play in providing urban services and influencing public policymaking, Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) have become a challenge to the conventional conception of public administration. Their origins lie in the United States' foundational privatism and the corporate origins of American governments. Many urban services were provided privately until the Progressive movement turned them into what has come to be known as public services. But between the privatization movement that began in and has been accelerating since the late 1970s and the academic advent of public choice theory, BIDs have arisen as a new form of "private government." As they expand their menus of services, often including land-use planning, and approaching more general-purpose government status, BIDs have begun to raise issues of accountability. This has become a problem for public administration theory, and there is a need to expand the notion of public administration to encompass these growing forms of governance. This article contends that the best way to capture the role of BIDs in the metropolitan governance process is network governance theory, which takes into account not only the many and various local governments but also the numerous nonprofit and for-profit organizations participating in this governance process.

AB - Because of their growing numbers and the increasingly significant roles they play in providing urban services and influencing public policymaking, Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) have become a challenge to the conventional conception of public administration. Their origins lie in the United States' foundational privatism and the corporate origins of American governments. Many urban services were provided privately until the Progressive movement turned them into what has come to be known as public services. But between the privatization movement that began in and has been accelerating since the late 1970s and the academic advent of public choice theory, BIDs have arisen as a new form of "private government." As they expand their menus of services, often including land-use planning, and approaching more general-purpose government status, BIDs have begun to raise issues of accountability. This has become a problem for public administration theory, and there is a need to expand the notion of public administration to encompass these growing forms of governance. This article contends that the best way to capture the role of BIDs in the metropolitan governance process is network governance theory, which takes into account not only the many and various local governments but also the numerous nonprofit and for-profit organizations participating in this governance process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745726709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745726709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01900690500408965

DO - 10.1080/01900690500408965

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 5

EP - 29

JO - International Journal of Public Administration

JF - International Journal of Public Administration

SN - 0190-0692

IS - 1-3

ER -