Micropenis. III. Primary hypogonadism, partial androgen insensitivity syndrome, and idiopathic disorders

P. A. Lee, R. K. Danish, T. Mazur, C. J. Migeon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper, the third in a series, presents data from 28 patients with micropenis categorized as primary hypogonadism (11 subjects), partial androgen insensitivity (1 subject), idiopathic (6 subjects), and etiology undetermined (10 subjects). Among the 11 patients with primary hypogonadism, 8 presented with various degrees of gonadal dysgenesis, 1 was a true hermaphodite and 2 had the Robinow syndrome. Nine of the 28 patients were raised as females; 5 with primary hypogonadism and 4 with undetermined etiology. Eleven of the 19 patients raised as males received androgen stimulation during prepubertal years and responded with penile growth. However, this growth response was temporary and did not appear to be predictive of eventual adult size of the penis. Generally, the prestimulation size of this group of patients is more predictive of adult penile size. Only 7 of the patients raised as males have attained adult somatic growth. Three out of the three with primary hypogonadism, the subject with partial androgen insensitivity, and one of three with idiopathic micropenis have below-normal adult penile length. These limited data suggest that growth potential of the micropenis may be greater among the patients with an idiopathic state than among those with primary hypogonadism and partial androgen insensitivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)175-181
Number of pages7
JournalJohns Hopkins Medical Journal
Volume147
Issue number5
StatePublished - Dec 1 1980

Fingerprint

Androgen-Insensitivity Syndrome
Hypogonadism
Growth
Gonadal Dysgenesis
Penis
Penis agenesis
Androgens

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{82d7c8bc64ea4a9187359d489d56c369,
title = "Micropenis. III. Primary hypogonadism, partial androgen insensitivity syndrome, and idiopathic disorders",
abstract = "This paper, the third in a series, presents data from 28 patients with micropenis categorized as primary hypogonadism (11 subjects), partial androgen insensitivity (1 subject), idiopathic (6 subjects), and etiology undetermined (10 subjects). Among the 11 patients with primary hypogonadism, 8 presented with various degrees of gonadal dysgenesis, 1 was a true hermaphodite and 2 had the Robinow syndrome. Nine of the 28 patients were raised as females; 5 with primary hypogonadism and 4 with undetermined etiology. Eleven of the 19 patients raised as males received androgen stimulation during prepubertal years and responded with penile growth. However, this growth response was temporary and did not appear to be predictive of eventual adult size of the penis. Generally, the prestimulation size of this group of patients is more predictive of adult penile size. Only 7 of the patients raised as males have attained adult somatic growth. Three out of the three with primary hypogonadism, the subject with partial androgen insensitivity, and one of three with idiopathic micropenis have below-normal adult penile length. These limited data suggest that growth potential of the micropenis may be greater among the patients with an idiopathic state than among those with primary hypogonadism and partial androgen insensitivity.",
author = "Lee, {P. A.} and Danish, {R. K.} and T. Mazur and Migeon, {C. J.}",
year = "1980",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "147",
pages = "175--181",
journal = "Johns Hopkins Medical Journal",
issn = "0021-7263",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "5",

}

Micropenis. III. Primary hypogonadism, partial androgen insensitivity syndrome, and idiopathic disorders. / Lee, P. A.; Danish, R. K.; Mazur, T.; Migeon, C. J.

In: Johns Hopkins Medical Journal, Vol. 147, No. 5, 01.12.1980, p. 175-181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Micropenis. III. Primary hypogonadism, partial androgen insensitivity syndrome, and idiopathic disorders

AU - Lee, P. A.

AU - Danish, R. K.

AU - Mazur, T.

AU - Migeon, C. J.

PY - 1980/12/1

Y1 - 1980/12/1

N2 - This paper, the third in a series, presents data from 28 patients with micropenis categorized as primary hypogonadism (11 subjects), partial androgen insensitivity (1 subject), idiopathic (6 subjects), and etiology undetermined (10 subjects). Among the 11 patients with primary hypogonadism, 8 presented with various degrees of gonadal dysgenesis, 1 was a true hermaphodite and 2 had the Robinow syndrome. Nine of the 28 patients were raised as females; 5 with primary hypogonadism and 4 with undetermined etiology. Eleven of the 19 patients raised as males received androgen stimulation during prepubertal years and responded with penile growth. However, this growth response was temporary and did not appear to be predictive of eventual adult size of the penis. Generally, the prestimulation size of this group of patients is more predictive of adult penile size. Only 7 of the patients raised as males have attained adult somatic growth. Three out of the three with primary hypogonadism, the subject with partial androgen insensitivity, and one of three with idiopathic micropenis have below-normal adult penile length. These limited data suggest that growth potential of the micropenis may be greater among the patients with an idiopathic state than among those with primary hypogonadism and partial androgen insensitivity.

AB - This paper, the third in a series, presents data from 28 patients with micropenis categorized as primary hypogonadism (11 subjects), partial androgen insensitivity (1 subject), idiopathic (6 subjects), and etiology undetermined (10 subjects). Among the 11 patients with primary hypogonadism, 8 presented with various degrees of gonadal dysgenesis, 1 was a true hermaphodite and 2 had the Robinow syndrome. Nine of the 28 patients were raised as females; 5 with primary hypogonadism and 4 with undetermined etiology. Eleven of the 19 patients raised as males received androgen stimulation during prepubertal years and responded with penile growth. However, this growth response was temporary and did not appear to be predictive of eventual adult size of the penis. Generally, the prestimulation size of this group of patients is more predictive of adult penile size. Only 7 of the patients raised as males have attained adult somatic growth. Three out of the three with primary hypogonadism, the subject with partial androgen insensitivity, and one of three with idiopathic micropenis have below-normal adult penile length. These limited data suggest that growth potential of the micropenis may be greater among the patients with an idiopathic state than among those with primary hypogonadism and partial androgen insensitivity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019136496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019136496&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7441936

AN - SCOPUS:0019136496

VL - 147

SP - 175

EP - 181

JO - Johns Hopkins Medical Journal

JF - Johns Hopkins Medical Journal

SN - 0021-7263

IS - 5

ER -