TY - JOUR
T1 - Middle managers and corruptive routine translation
T2 - The social production of deceptive performance
AU - den Nieuwenboer, Niki A.
AU - da Cunha, João Vieira
AU - Treviño, Linda Klebe
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank all the audiences to which we have presented this paper for their positive responses and helpful suggestions, such as the Organizations Research Group (ORG) at Penn State and the 2014 Behavioral Ethics Conference at the University of Central Florida. Thanks also to Muel Kaptein for his support in the earlier phases of the project. We would furthermore like to thank our friendly reviewers Denny Gioia and Raghu Garud as well as our Senior Editor Michel Anteby and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive feedback.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 INFORMS.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Our study offers an understanding of how middle managers may use routines as tools to induce their subordinates to engage in widespread unethical behavior. We conducted a 15-month ethnography at a desk sales unit within a large telecommunications firmand discovered that middle managers coerced their subordinates into deceiving upper management about the unit's performance. Based upon our findings and relying on the routine dynamics literature, we propose that middle managers engaged in a process that we label "corruptive routine translation." It involves the translation by middle managers of upper management's more abstract and higher level performance routine into a corrupted, lower level version of that routine that is enacted by frontline employees. In corruptive routine translation, middle managers respond to performance obstacles by identifying and exploiting structural vulnerabilities to generate and conceal deceptive performance. We also illustrate how routines are interdependent across levels within an organization's hierarchy, implicating upper management, middle management, and lower level employees in the collective phenomenon that is the social production of deceit. Our model contributes to the routines dynamics literature as well as to the literature on ethics at work by highlighting the corruptive routine translation process through which middle managers use routines as tools to induce deceptive performance in their subordinates.
AB - Our study offers an understanding of how middle managers may use routines as tools to induce their subordinates to engage in widespread unethical behavior. We conducted a 15-month ethnography at a desk sales unit within a large telecommunications firmand discovered that middle managers coerced their subordinates into deceiving upper management about the unit's performance. Based upon our findings and relying on the routine dynamics literature, we propose that middle managers engaged in a process that we label "corruptive routine translation." It involves the translation by middle managers of upper management's more abstract and higher level performance routine into a corrupted, lower level version of that routine that is enacted by frontline employees. In corruptive routine translation, middle managers respond to performance obstacles by identifying and exploiting structural vulnerabilities to generate and conceal deceptive performance. We also illustrate how routines are interdependent across levels within an organization's hierarchy, implicating upper management, middle management, and lower level employees in the collective phenomenon that is the social production of deceit. Our model contributes to the routines dynamics literature as well as to the literature on ethics at work by highlighting the corruptive routine translation process through which middle managers use routines as tools to induce deceptive performance in their subordinates.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031744903&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031744903&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1287/orsc.2017.1153
DO - 10.1287/orsc.2017.1153
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85031744903
SN - 1047-7039
VL - 28
SP - 781
EP - 803
JO - Organization Science
JF - Organization Science
IS - 5
ER -