Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: Retrospective cohort study

Lisa B. Signorello, Bernard L. Harlow, Amy K. Chekos, John Repke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

144 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the relation between midline episiotomy and postpartum anal incontinence. Design: Retrospective cohort study with three study arms and six months of follow up. Setting: University teaching hospital. Participants: Primiparous women who vaginally delivered a live full term, singleton baby between 1 August 1996 and 8 February 1997: 209 who received an episiotomy; 206 who did not receive an episiotomy but experienced a second, third, or fourth degree spontaneous perineal laceration; and 211 who experienced either no laceration or a first degree perineal laceration. Main outcome measures: Self reported faecal and natus incontinence at three and six months postpartum. Results: Women who had episiotomies had a higher risk of faecal incontinence at three (odds ratio 5.5, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 16.2) and six (3.7, 0.9 to 15.6) months postpartum compared with women with an intact perineum. Compared with women with a spontaneous laceration, episiotomy tripled the risk of faecal incontinence at three months (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 7.9) and six months (0.7 to 11.2) postpartum, and doubled the risk of flatus incontinence at three months (1.3 to 3.4) and six months (1.2 to 3.7) postpartum. A non-extending episiotomy (that is, second degree surgical incision) tripled the risk of faecal incontinence (1.1 to 9.0) and nearly doubled the risk of flatus incontinence (1.0 to 3.0) at three months postpartum compared with women who had a second degree spontaneous tear. The effect of episiotomy was independent of maternal age,infant birth weight, duration of second stage of labour, use of obstetric instrumentation during delivery,and complications of labour. Conclusions: Midline episiotomy is not effective in protecting the perineum and sphincters during childbirth and may impair anal continence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)86-90
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Medical Journal
Volume320
Issue number7227
StatePublished - Jan 8 2000

Fingerprint

Episiotomy
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Postpartum Period
Fecal Incontinence
Lacerations
Flatulence
Perineum
Obstetric Labor Complications
Confidence Intervals
Second Labor Stage
Maternal Age
Tears
Birth Weight
Teaching Hospitals
Obstetrics
Arm
Odds Ratio
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Parturition

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Signorello, L. B., Harlow, B. L., Chekos, A. K., & Repke, J. (2000). Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: Retrospective cohort study. British Medical Journal, 320(7227), 86-90.
Signorello, Lisa B. ; Harlow, Bernard L. ; Chekos, Amy K. ; Repke, John. / Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence : Retrospective cohort study. In: British Medical Journal. 2000 ; Vol. 320, No. 7227. pp. 86-90.
@article{d28bfd9ee37b411ca92a9356a07f33d0,
title = "Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: Retrospective cohort study",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the relation between midline episiotomy and postpartum anal incontinence. Design: Retrospective cohort study with three study arms and six months of follow up. Setting: University teaching hospital. Participants: Primiparous women who vaginally delivered a live full term, singleton baby between 1 August 1996 and 8 February 1997: 209 who received an episiotomy; 206 who did not receive an episiotomy but experienced a second, third, or fourth degree spontaneous perineal laceration; and 211 who experienced either no laceration or a first degree perineal laceration. Main outcome measures: Self reported faecal and natus incontinence at three and six months postpartum. Results: Women who had episiotomies had a higher risk of faecal incontinence at three (odds ratio 5.5, 95{\%} confidence interval 1.8 to 16.2) and six (3.7, 0.9 to 15.6) months postpartum compared with women with an intact perineum. Compared with women with a spontaneous laceration, episiotomy tripled the risk of faecal incontinence at three months (95{\%} confidence interval 1.3 to 7.9) and six months (0.7 to 11.2) postpartum, and doubled the risk of flatus incontinence at three months (1.3 to 3.4) and six months (1.2 to 3.7) postpartum. A non-extending episiotomy (that is, second degree surgical incision) tripled the risk of faecal incontinence (1.1 to 9.0) and nearly doubled the risk of flatus incontinence (1.0 to 3.0) at three months postpartum compared with women who had a second degree spontaneous tear. The effect of episiotomy was independent of maternal age,infant birth weight, duration of second stage of labour, use of obstetric instrumentation during delivery,and complications of labour. Conclusions: Midline episiotomy is not effective in protecting the perineum and sphincters during childbirth and may impair anal continence.",
author = "Signorello, {Lisa B.} and Harlow, {Bernard L.} and Chekos, {Amy K.} and John Repke",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "320",
pages = "86--90",
journal = "The BMJ",
issn = "0267-0623",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7227",

}

Signorello, LB, Harlow, BL, Chekos, AK & Repke, J 2000, 'Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: Retrospective cohort study', British Medical Journal, vol. 320, no. 7227, pp. 86-90.

Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence : Retrospective cohort study. / Signorello, Lisa B.; Harlow, Bernard L.; Chekos, Amy K.; Repke, John.

In: British Medical Journal, Vol. 320, No. 7227, 08.01.2000, p. 86-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence

T2 - Retrospective cohort study

AU - Signorello, Lisa B.

AU - Harlow, Bernard L.

AU - Chekos, Amy K.

AU - Repke, John

PY - 2000/1/8

Y1 - 2000/1/8

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the relation between midline episiotomy and postpartum anal incontinence. Design: Retrospective cohort study with three study arms and six months of follow up. Setting: University teaching hospital. Participants: Primiparous women who vaginally delivered a live full term, singleton baby between 1 August 1996 and 8 February 1997: 209 who received an episiotomy; 206 who did not receive an episiotomy but experienced a second, third, or fourth degree spontaneous perineal laceration; and 211 who experienced either no laceration or a first degree perineal laceration. Main outcome measures: Self reported faecal and natus incontinence at three and six months postpartum. Results: Women who had episiotomies had a higher risk of faecal incontinence at three (odds ratio 5.5, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 16.2) and six (3.7, 0.9 to 15.6) months postpartum compared with women with an intact perineum. Compared with women with a spontaneous laceration, episiotomy tripled the risk of faecal incontinence at three months (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 7.9) and six months (0.7 to 11.2) postpartum, and doubled the risk of flatus incontinence at three months (1.3 to 3.4) and six months (1.2 to 3.7) postpartum. A non-extending episiotomy (that is, second degree surgical incision) tripled the risk of faecal incontinence (1.1 to 9.0) and nearly doubled the risk of flatus incontinence (1.0 to 3.0) at three months postpartum compared with women who had a second degree spontaneous tear. The effect of episiotomy was independent of maternal age,infant birth weight, duration of second stage of labour, use of obstetric instrumentation during delivery,and complications of labour. Conclusions: Midline episiotomy is not effective in protecting the perineum and sphincters during childbirth and may impair anal continence.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the relation between midline episiotomy and postpartum anal incontinence. Design: Retrospective cohort study with three study arms and six months of follow up. Setting: University teaching hospital. Participants: Primiparous women who vaginally delivered a live full term, singleton baby between 1 August 1996 and 8 February 1997: 209 who received an episiotomy; 206 who did not receive an episiotomy but experienced a second, third, or fourth degree spontaneous perineal laceration; and 211 who experienced either no laceration or a first degree perineal laceration. Main outcome measures: Self reported faecal and natus incontinence at three and six months postpartum. Results: Women who had episiotomies had a higher risk of faecal incontinence at three (odds ratio 5.5, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 16.2) and six (3.7, 0.9 to 15.6) months postpartum compared with women with an intact perineum. Compared with women with a spontaneous laceration, episiotomy tripled the risk of faecal incontinence at three months (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 7.9) and six months (0.7 to 11.2) postpartum, and doubled the risk of flatus incontinence at three months (1.3 to 3.4) and six months (1.2 to 3.7) postpartum. A non-extending episiotomy (that is, second degree surgical incision) tripled the risk of faecal incontinence (1.1 to 9.0) and nearly doubled the risk of flatus incontinence (1.0 to 3.0) at three months postpartum compared with women who had a second degree spontaneous tear. The effect of episiotomy was independent of maternal age,infant birth weight, duration of second stage of labour, use of obstetric instrumentation during delivery,and complications of labour. Conclusions: Midline episiotomy is not effective in protecting the perineum and sphincters during childbirth and may impair anal continence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034620298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034620298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10625261

AN - SCOPUS:0034620298

VL - 320

SP - 86

EP - 90

JO - The BMJ

JF - The BMJ

SN - 0267-0623

IS - 7227

ER -

Signorello LB, Harlow BL, Chekos AK, Repke J. Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: Retrospective cohort study. British Medical Journal. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):86-90.