Minimally invasive Le Fort III distraction

Larry Hollier, Patrick Kelly, Edward Babigumira, John Potochny, Terry Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent applications of distraction osteogenesis to the Le Fort III osteotomy in patients with craniofacial dysostosis have proven promising.1-3 Distraction has allowed the midfacial segment to be brought further forward and maintained in position with greater stability when compared with the standard technique of intraoperative advancement. Because no bone grafts or plates must be placed, access incisions are necessary only for performance of the osteotomy. In an effort to minimize the morbidity of the procedure, we have begun performing the Le Fort III osteotomy without the coronal incision. Instead, the nasofrontal junction is approached using the medial aspect of an upper blepharoplasty incision. A lower eyelid and gingivobuccal sulcus incision are also used to complete the osteotomy. This technique has resulted in a shorter operative time and decreased blood loss when compared with the Le Fort III distraction procedure using the standard coronal incision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)44-48
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Le Fort Osteotomy
Osteotomy
Craniofacial Dysostosis
Blepharoplasty
Distraction Osteogenesis
Eyelids
Operative Time
Morbidity
Transplants
Bone and Bones

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Hollier, Larry ; Kelly, Patrick ; Babigumira, Edward ; Potochny, John ; Taylor, Terry. / Minimally invasive Le Fort III distraction. In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2002 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 44-48.
@article{1802a198e8e74f6380f3400f0d4759e8,
title = "Minimally invasive Le Fort III distraction",
abstract = "Recent applications of distraction osteogenesis to the Le Fort III osteotomy in patients with craniofacial dysostosis have proven promising.1-3 Distraction has allowed the midfacial segment to be brought further forward and maintained in position with greater stability when compared with the standard technique of intraoperative advancement. Because no bone grafts or plates must be placed, access incisions are necessary only for performance of the osteotomy. In an effort to minimize the morbidity of the procedure, we have begun performing the Le Fort III osteotomy without the coronal incision. Instead, the nasofrontal junction is approached using the medial aspect of an upper blepharoplasty incision. A lower eyelid and gingivobuccal sulcus incision are also used to complete the osteotomy. This technique has resulted in a shorter operative time and decreased blood loss when compared with the Le Fort III distraction procedure using the standard coronal incision.",
author = "Larry Hollier and Patrick Kelly and Edward Babigumira and John Potochny and Terry Taylor",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00001665-200201000-00009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "44--48",
journal = "Journal of Craniofacial Surgery",
issn = "1049-2275",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

Minimally invasive Le Fort III distraction. / Hollier, Larry; Kelly, Patrick; Babigumira, Edward; Potochny, John; Taylor, Terry.

In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.01.2002, p. 44-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive Le Fort III distraction

AU - Hollier, Larry

AU - Kelly, Patrick

AU - Babigumira, Edward

AU - Potochny, John

AU - Taylor, Terry

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Recent applications of distraction osteogenesis to the Le Fort III osteotomy in patients with craniofacial dysostosis have proven promising.1-3 Distraction has allowed the midfacial segment to be brought further forward and maintained in position with greater stability when compared with the standard technique of intraoperative advancement. Because no bone grafts or plates must be placed, access incisions are necessary only for performance of the osteotomy. In an effort to minimize the morbidity of the procedure, we have begun performing the Le Fort III osteotomy without the coronal incision. Instead, the nasofrontal junction is approached using the medial aspect of an upper blepharoplasty incision. A lower eyelid and gingivobuccal sulcus incision are also used to complete the osteotomy. This technique has resulted in a shorter operative time and decreased blood loss when compared with the Le Fort III distraction procedure using the standard coronal incision.

AB - Recent applications of distraction osteogenesis to the Le Fort III osteotomy in patients with craniofacial dysostosis have proven promising.1-3 Distraction has allowed the midfacial segment to be brought further forward and maintained in position with greater stability when compared with the standard technique of intraoperative advancement. Because no bone grafts or plates must be placed, access incisions are necessary only for performance of the osteotomy. In an effort to minimize the morbidity of the procedure, we have begun performing the Le Fort III osteotomy without the coronal incision. Instead, the nasofrontal junction is approached using the medial aspect of an upper blepharoplasty incision. A lower eyelid and gingivobuccal sulcus incision are also used to complete the osteotomy. This technique has resulted in a shorter operative time and decreased blood loss when compared with the Le Fort III distraction procedure using the standard coronal incision.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036332270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036332270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00001665-200201000-00009

DO - 10.1097/00001665-200201000-00009

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 44

EP - 48

JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

SN - 1049-2275

IS - 1

ER -