Mobile mesonet observations on 3 May 1999

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two long-lived tornadic supercells were sampled by an automobile-borne observing system on 3 May 1999. The "mobile mesonet" observed relatively warm and moist air, weak baroclinity, and small pressure excess at the surface within the rear-flank downdrafts of the storms. Furthermore, the downdraft air parcels, which have been shown to enter the tornado in past observational and modeling studies, were associated with substantial convective available potential energy and small convective inhibition. The detection of only small equivalent potential temperature deficits (1-4 K) within the downdrafts may imply that the downdrafts were driven primarily by nonhydrostatic pressure gradients and/or precipitation drag, rather than by the entrainment of potentially cold environmental air at midlevels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)430-444
Number of pages15
JournalWeather and Forecasting
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

air
supercell
tornado
potential temperature
potential energy
pressure gradient
entrainment
drag
automobile
modeling
detection
cold

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

@article{e059d453c73c429daa0a7692bb7a492d,
title = "Mobile mesonet observations on 3 May 1999",
abstract = "Two long-lived tornadic supercells were sampled by an automobile-borne observing system on 3 May 1999. The {"}mobile mesonet{"} observed relatively warm and moist air, weak baroclinity, and small pressure excess at the surface within the rear-flank downdrafts of the storms. Furthermore, the downdraft air parcels, which have been shown to enter the tornado in past observational and modeling studies, were associated with substantial convective available potential energy and small convective inhibition. The detection of only small equivalent potential temperature deficits (1-4 K) within the downdrafts may imply that the downdrafts were driven primarily by nonhydrostatic pressure gradients and/or precipitation drag, rather than by the entrainment of potentially cold environmental air at midlevels.",
author = "Paul Markowski",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0430:MMOOM>2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "430--444",
journal = "Weather and Forecasting",
issn = "0882-8156",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "3",

}

Mobile mesonet observations on 3 May 1999. / Markowski, Paul.

In: Weather and Forecasting, Vol. 17, No. 3, 01.01.2002, p. 430-444.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mobile mesonet observations on 3 May 1999

AU - Markowski, Paul

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Two long-lived tornadic supercells were sampled by an automobile-borne observing system on 3 May 1999. The "mobile mesonet" observed relatively warm and moist air, weak baroclinity, and small pressure excess at the surface within the rear-flank downdrafts of the storms. Furthermore, the downdraft air parcels, which have been shown to enter the tornado in past observational and modeling studies, were associated with substantial convective available potential energy and small convective inhibition. The detection of only small equivalent potential temperature deficits (1-4 K) within the downdrafts may imply that the downdrafts were driven primarily by nonhydrostatic pressure gradients and/or precipitation drag, rather than by the entrainment of potentially cold environmental air at midlevels.

AB - Two long-lived tornadic supercells were sampled by an automobile-borne observing system on 3 May 1999. The "mobile mesonet" observed relatively warm and moist air, weak baroclinity, and small pressure excess at the surface within the rear-flank downdrafts of the storms. Furthermore, the downdraft air parcels, which have been shown to enter the tornado in past observational and modeling studies, were associated with substantial convective available potential energy and small convective inhibition. The detection of only small equivalent potential temperature deficits (1-4 K) within the downdrafts may imply that the downdrafts were driven primarily by nonhydrostatic pressure gradients and/or precipitation drag, rather than by the entrainment of potentially cold environmental air at midlevels.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036614320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036614320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0430:MMOOM>2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0430:MMOOM>2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036614320

VL - 17

SP - 430

EP - 444

JO - Weather and Forecasting

JF - Weather and Forecasting

SN - 0882-8156

IS - 3

ER -