Modeling a small, northeastern watershed with detailed, field-level data

Tameria L Veith, Andrew N. Sharpley, Jeffrey G. Arnold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Time, resource, and replication constraints limit the practicality of conducting agricultural experimental studies at scales larger than plot-level. Thus, watershed-level models such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) are increasingly used to forecast effects of land management changes on downstream water quality. With the generalization in scale, the question of effect of generalization in input data arises. That is, to what extent does having field-level, daily input data for a watershed model aid in the ability to predict watershed-scale, water quality impacts. The study site, FD-36, is a 39.5 ha agricultural subwatershed of a long-term USDA-ARS study watershed in south central Pennsylvania. FD-36 is characterized by loamy soils with a substantial near-stream fragipan. Fifty percent of FD-36 includes 24 row-cropped fields from three independently managed farms. Two SWAT scenarios were simulated on FD-36 and compared with each other as well as with measured data over two 4-year periods (1997-2000 and 2001-2004). The high-resolution scenario modeled seasonal crop, fertilizer, and tillage events of each row-cropped field continuously over the 8-year period. The low-resolution scenario treated all row-cropped fields as the same generic crop (AGRR in SWAT). Flow depth predictions at the outlet were similar for the two SWAT scenarios. While both scenarios showed higher levels of soil water in the fragipan soils than the surrounding soils, the high-resolution scenario was able to identify field-to-field distinctions due to the increased detail in input data. In general, model results were more defined at the field-level under the high-resolution scenario and followed patterns expected from knowledge about soil science, hydrology, P transport, and the characteristics of the study watershed. However, the time spent collecting, understanding, entering, and error-checking input data required for the high-resolution scenario was on the order of months, while full data collection for the low-resolution scenario took several days. Results suggest that while detailed input data can enable the model to provide valuable water quality information, research efficiency during exploratory and initial problem-solving efforts might be maximized by using more easily obtained, although more general, data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)471-483
Number of pages13
JournalTransactions of the ASABE
Volume51
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 1 2008

Fingerprint

Watersheds
Soil
Soil and Water Assessment Tool model
watershed
Soils
modeling
fragipans
Water Quality
fragipan
water quality
Water
Water quality
Crops
subwatersheds
Agricultural Research Service
Hydrology
soil science
loam soils
crop
crops

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Forestry
  • Food Science
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Soil Science

Cite this

Veith, T. L., Sharpley, A. N., & Arnold, J. G. (2008). Modeling a small, northeastern watershed with detailed, field-level data. Transactions of the ASABE, 51(2), 471-483.
Veith, Tameria L ; Sharpley, Andrew N. ; Arnold, Jeffrey G. / Modeling a small, northeastern watershed with detailed, field-level data. In: Transactions of the ASABE. 2008 ; Vol. 51, No. 2. pp. 471-483.
@article{fa8cf44df90340218ec60cde87a3690f,
title = "Modeling a small, northeastern watershed with detailed, field-level data",
abstract = "Time, resource, and replication constraints limit the practicality of conducting agricultural experimental studies at scales larger than plot-level. Thus, watershed-level models such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) are increasingly used to forecast effects of land management changes on downstream water quality. With the generalization in scale, the question of effect of generalization in input data arises. That is, to what extent does having field-level, daily input data for a watershed model aid in the ability to predict watershed-scale, water quality impacts. The study site, FD-36, is a 39.5 ha agricultural subwatershed of a long-term USDA-ARS study watershed in south central Pennsylvania. FD-36 is characterized by loamy soils with a substantial near-stream fragipan. Fifty percent of FD-36 includes 24 row-cropped fields from three independently managed farms. Two SWAT scenarios were simulated on FD-36 and compared with each other as well as with measured data over two 4-year periods (1997-2000 and 2001-2004). The high-resolution scenario modeled seasonal crop, fertilizer, and tillage events of each row-cropped field continuously over the 8-year period. The low-resolution scenario treated all row-cropped fields as the same generic crop (AGRR in SWAT). Flow depth predictions at the outlet were similar for the two SWAT scenarios. While both scenarios showed higher levels of soil water in the fragipan soils than the surrounding soils, the high-resolution scenario was able to identify field-to-field distinctions due to the increased detail in input data. In general, model results were more defined at the field-level under the high-resolution scenario and followed patterns expected from knowledge about soil science, hydrology, P transport, and the characteristics of the study watershed. However, the time spent collecting, understanding, entering, and error-checking input data required for the high-resolution scenario was on the order of months, while full data collection for the low-resolution scenario took several days. Results suggest that while detailed input data can enable the model to provide valuable water quality information, research efficiency during exploratory and initial problem-solving efforts might be maximized by using more easily obtained, although more general, data.",
author = "Veith, {Tameria L} and Sharpley, {Andrew N.} and Arnold, {Jeffrey G.}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "471--483",
journal = "Transactions of the ASABE",
issn = "2151-0032",
publisher = "American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers",
number = "2",

}

Veith, TL, Sharpley, AN & Arnold, JG 2008, 'Modeling a small, northeastern watershed with detailed, field-level data', Transactions of the ASABE, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 471-483.

Modeling a small, northeastern watershed with detailed, field-level data. / Veith, Tameria L; Sharpley, Andrew N.; Arnold, Jeffrey G.

In: Transactions of the ASABE, Vol. 51, No. 2, 01.03.2008, p. 471-483.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling a small, northeastern watershed with detailed, field-level data

AU - Veith, Tameria L

AU - Sharpley, Andrew N.

AU - Arnold, Jeffrey G.

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - Time, resource, and replication constraints limit the practicality of conducting agricultural experimental studies at scales larger than plot-level. Thus, watershed-level models such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) are increasingly used to forecast effects of land management changes on downstream water quality. With the generalization in scale, the question of effect of generalization in input data arises. That is, to what extent does having field-level, daily input data for a watershed model aid in the ability to predict watershed-scale, water quality impacts. The study site, FD-36, is a 39.5 ha agricultural subwatershed of a long-term USDA-ARS study watershed in south central Pennsylvania. FD-36 is characterized by loamy soils with a substantial near-stream fragipan. Fifty percent of FD-36 includes 24 row-cropped fields from three independently managed farms. Two SWAT scenarios were simulated on FD-36 and compared with each other as well as with measured data over two 4-year periods (1997-2000 and 2001-2004). The high-resolution scenario modeled seasonal crop, fertilizer, and tillage events of each row-cropped field continuously over the 8-year period. The low-resolution scenario treated all row-cropped fields as the same generic crop (AGRR in SWAT). Flow depth predictions at the outlet were similar for the two SWAT scenarios. While both scenarios showed higher levels of soil water in the fragipan soils than the surrounding soils, the high-resolution scenario was able to identify field-to-field distinctions due to the increased detail in input data. In general, model results were more defined at the field-level under the high-resolution scenario and followed patterns expected from knowledge about soil science, hydrology, P transport, and the characteristics of the study watershed. However, the time spent collecting, understanding, entering, and error-checking input data required for the high-resolution scenario was on the order of months, while full data collection for the low-resolution scenario took several days. Results suggest that while detailed input data can enable the model to provide valuable water quality information, research efficiency during exploratory and initial problem-solving efforts might be maximized by using more easily obtained, although more general, data.

AB - Time, resource, and replication constraints limit the practicality of conducting agricultural experimental studies at scales larger than plot-level. Thus, watershed-level models such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) are increasingly used to forecast effects of land management changes on downstream water quality. With the generalization in scale, the question of effect of generalization in input data arises. That is, to what extent does having field-level, daily input data for a watershed model aid in the ability to predict watershed-scale, water quality impacts. The study site, FD-36, is a 39.5 ha agricultural subwatershed of a long-term USDA-ARS study watershed in south central Pennsylvania. FD-36 is characterized by loamy soils with a substantial near-stream fragipan. Fifty percent of FD-36 includes 24 row-cropped fields from three independently managed farms. Two SWAT scenarios were simulated on FD-36 and compared with each other as well as with measured data over two 4-year periods (1997-2000 and 2001-2004). The high-resolution scenario modeled seasonal crop, fertilizer, and tillage events of each row-cropped field continuously over the 8-year period. The low-resolution scenario treated all row-cropped fields as the same generic crop (AGRR in SWAT). Flow depth predictions at the outlet were similar for the two SWAT scenarios. While both scenarios showed higher levels of soil water in the fragipan soils than the surrounding soils, the high-resolution scenario was able to identify field-to-field distinctions due to the increased detail in input data. In general, model results were more defined at the field-level under the high-resolution scenario and followed patterns expected from knowledge about soil science, hydrology, P transport, and the characteristics of the study watershed. However, the time spent collecting, understanding, entering, and error-checking input data required for the high-resolution scenario was on the order of months, while full data collection for the low-resolution scenario took several days. Results suggest that while detailed input data can enable the model to provide valuable water quality information, research efficiency during exploratory and initial problem-solving efforts might be maximized by using more easily obtained, although more general, data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44449163020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44449163020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:44449163020

VL - 51

SP - 471

EP - 483

JO - Transactions of the ASABE

JF - Transactions of the ASABE

SN - 2151-0032

IS - 2

ER -