Modeling of cytometry data in logarithmic space: When is a bimodal distribution not bimodal?

Amir Erez, Robert Vogel, Andrew Mugler, Andrew Belmonte, Grégoire Altan-Bonnet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent efforts in systems immunology lead researchers to build quantitative models of cell activation and differentiation. One goal is to account for the distributions of proteins from single-cell measurements by flow cytometry or mass cytometry as readout of biological regulation. In that context, large cell-to-cell variability is often observed in biological quantities. We show here that these readouts, viewed in logarithmic scale may result in two easily-distinguishable modes, while the underlying distribution (in linear scale) is unimodal. We introduce a simple mathematical test to highlight this mismatch. We then dissect the flow of influence of cell-to-cell variability proposing a graphical model which motivates higher-dimensional analysis of the data. Finally we show how acquiring additional biological information can be used to reduce uncertainty introduced by cell-to-cell variability, helping to clarify whether the data is uni- or bimodal. This communication has cautionary implications for manual and automatic gating strategies, as well as clustering and modeling of single-cell measurements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)611-619
Number of pages9
JournalCytometry Part A
Volume93
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Allergy and Immunology
Uncertainty
Cluster Analysis
Cell Differentiation
Flow Cytometry
Research Personnel
single cell proteins

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Histology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Erez, Amir ; Vogel, Robert ; Mugler, Andrew ; Belmonte, Andrew ; Altan-Bonnet, Grégoire. / Modeling of cytometry data in logarithmic space : When is a bimodal distribution not bimodal?. In: Cytometry Part A. 2018 ; Vol. 93, No. 6. pp. 611-619.
@article{a34fffcc92744d76b4f254afcae392ab,
title = "Modeling of cytometry data in logarithmic space: When is a bimodal distribution not bimodal?",
abstract = "Recent efforts in systems immunology lead researchers to build quantitative models of cell activation and differentiation. One goal is to account for the distributions of proteins from single-cell measurements by flow cytometry or mass cytometry as readout of biological regulation. In that context, large cell-to-cell variability is often observed in biological quantities. We show here that these readouts, viewed in logarithmic scale may result in two easily-distinguishable modes, while the underlying distribution (in linear scale) is unimodal. We introduce a simple mathematical test to highlight this mismatch. We then dissect the flow of influence of cell-to-cell variability proposing a graphical model which motivates higher-dimensional analysis of the data. Finally we show how acquiring additional biological information can be used to reduce uncertainty introduced by cell-to-cell variability, helping to clarify whether the data is uni- or bimodal. This communication has cautionary implications for manual and automatic gating strategies, as well as clustering and modeling of single-cell measurements.",
author = "Amir Erez and Robert Vogel and Andrew Mugler and Andrew Belmonte and Gr{\'e}goire Altan-Bonnet",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/cyto.a.23333",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "611--619",
journal = "Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology",
issn = "1552-4922",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Modeling of cytometry data in logarithmic space : When is a bimodal distribution not bimodal? / Erez, Amir; Vogel, Robert; Mugler, Andrew; Belmonte, Andrew; Altan-Bonnet, Grégoire.

In: Cytometry Part A, Vol. 93, No. 6, 01.06.2018, p. 611-619.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling of cytometry data in logarithmic space

T2 - When is a bimodal distribution not bimodal?

AU - Erez, Amir

AU - Vogel, Robert

AU - Mugler, Andrew

AU - Belmonte, Andrew

AU - Altan-Bonnet, Grégoire

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Recent efforts in systems immunology lead researchers to build quantitative models of cell activation and differentiation. One goal is to account for the distributions of proteins from single-cell measurements by flow cytometry or mass cytometry as readout of biological regulation. In that context, large cell-to-cell variability is often observed in biological quantities. We show here that these readouts, viewed in logarithmic scale may result in two easily-distinguishable modes, while the underlying distribution (in linear scale) is unimodal. We introduce a simple mathematical test to highlight this mismatch. We then dissect the flow of influence of cell-to-cell variability proposing a graphical model which motivates higher-dimensional analysis of the data. Finally we show how acquiring additional biological information can be used to reduce uncertainty introduced by cell-to-cell variability, helping to clarify whether the data is uni- or bimodal. This communication has cautionary implications for manual and automatic gating strategies, as well as clustering and modeling of single-cell measurements.

AB - Recent efforts in systems immunology lead researchers to build quantitative models of cell activation and differentiation. One goal is to account for the distributions of proteins from single-cell measurements by flow cytometry or mass cytometry as readout of biological regulation. In that context, large cell-to-cell variability is often observed in biological quantities. We show here that these readouts, viewed in logarithmic scale may result in two easily-distinguishable modes, while the underlying distribution (in linear scale) is unimodal. We introduce a simple mathematical test to highlight this mismatch. We then dissect the flow of influence of cell-to-cell variability proposing a graphical model which motivates higher-dimensional analysis of the data. Finally we show how acquiring additional biological information can be used to reduce uncertainty introduced by cell-to-cell variability, helping to clarify whether the data is uni- or bimodal. This communication has cautionary implications for manual and automatic gating strategies, as well as clustering and modeling of single-cell measurements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042094890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042094890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cyto.a.23333

DO - 10.1002/cyto.a.23333

M3 - Article

C2 - 29451717

AN - SCOPUS:85042094890

VL - 93

SP - 611

EP - 619

JO - Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology

JF - Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology

SN - 1552-4922

IS - 6

ER -