Modeling soil temperatures and the mesic-frigid boundary in the central Great Lakes region, 1951-2000

Randall J. Schaetzl, Bruce D. Knapp, Scott Alan Isard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding the spatial and temporal variation in soil temperatures is important to classification, land use, and management. To that end, mean annual soil temperature (MAST) data for Wisconsin and Michigan were modeled to (i) determine the effects of the Great Lakes and their snowbelts on soil temperatures, and (ii) better estimate the location of the boundary between the mesic and frigid soil temperature regimes in this region. The location of the mesic-frigid (M-F) line is particularly difficult to determine where east-west gradients in air temperature cross north-south trends in snowfall due to Lake Michigan. Additionally, the soil temperature regime of several Great Lakes' peninsulas near the M-F line is in question. To determine the accuracy of our soil temperature model, soil temperature data output from it were compared with data derived from thermocouples implanted in soils at 39 sites in northern Michigan that had been collecting data several times daily for more than 6 yr. Error statistics for the model show that it has essentially no mean bias when examined on an annual basis or for winter, and only a bias of 0.1°C for the warm season. The M-F line in Wisconsin and Michigan is slightly north of most previously estimated locations, and is strongly influenced by the snowbelt in southern Michigan. Soils in deep snow areas stay warmer in winter than do soils inland, increasing their MAST and forcing the M-F line north of where air temperatures alone might have placed if. Lake-effect areas also stay cold longer into the spring season, and cool down more slowly in fall. Soil temperatures in these areas are, therefore, more moderated on an annual basis, as indicated by coefficients of variation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2033-2040
Number of pages8
JournalSoil Science Society of America Journal
Volume69
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2005

Fingerprint

Great Lakes region
soil temperature
lake
modeling
soil temperature regimes
Great Lakes
snow
air temperature
soil
thermocouples
Lake Michigan
winter
warm season
land management
spring (season)
temporal variation
spatial variation
statistics
land use
lakes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Soil Science

Cite this

@article{daee668ac98044b1b6b3e03f39f26c3f,
title = "Modeling soil temperatures and the mesic-frigid boundary in the central Great Lakes region, 1951-2000",
abstract = "Understanding the spatial and temporal variation in soil temperatures is important to classification, land use, and management. To that end, mean annual soil temperature (MAST) data for Wisconsin and Michigan were modeled to (i) determine the effects of the Great Lakes and their snowbelts on soil temperatures, and (ii) better estimate the location of the boundary between the mesic and frigid soil temperature regimes in this region. The location of the mesic-frigid (M-F) line is particularly difficult to determine where east-west gradients in air temperature cross north-south trends in snowfall due to Lake Michigan. Additionally, the soil temperature regime of several Great Lakes' peninsulas near the M-F line is in question. To determine the accuracy of our soil temperature model, soil temperature data output from it were compared with data derived from thermocouples implanted in soils at 39 sites in northern Michigan that had been collecting data several times daily for more than 6 yr. Error statistics for the model show that it has essentially no mean bias when examined on an annual basis or for winter, and only a bias of 0.1°C for the warm season. The M-F line in Wisconsin and Michigan is slightly north of most previously estimated locations, and is strongly influenced by the snowbelt in southern Michigan. Soils in deep snow areas stay warmer in winter than do soils inland, increasing their MAST and forcing the M-F line north of where air temperatures alone might have placed if. Lake-effect areas also stay cold longer into the spring season, and cool down more slowly in fall. Soil temperatures in these areas are, therefore, more moderated on an annual basis, as indicated by coefficients of variation.",
author = "Schaetzl, {Randall J.} and Knapp, {Bruce D.} and Isard, {Scott Alan}",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2136/sssaj2004.0349",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "2033--2040",
journal = "Soil Science Society of America Journal",
issn = "0361-5995",
publisher = "Soil Science Society of America",
number = "6",

}

Modeling soil temperatures and the mesic-frigid boundary in the central Great Lakes region, 1951-2000. / Schaetzl, Randall J.; Knapp, Bruce D.; Isard, Scott Alan.

In: Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 69, No. 6, 01.11.2005, p. 2033-2040.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling soil temperatures and the mesic-frigid boundary in the central Great Lakes region, 1951-2000

AU - Schaetzl, Randall J.

AU - Knapp, Bruce D.

AU - Isard, Scott Alan

PY - 2005/11/1

Y1 - 2005/11/1

N2 - Understanding the spatial and temporal variation in soil temperatures is important to classification, land use, and management. To that end, mean annual soil temperature (MAST) data for Wisconsin and Michigan were modeled to (i) determine the effects of the Great Lakes and their snowbelts on soil temperatures, and (ii) better estimate the location of the boundary between the mesic and frigid soil temperature regimes in this region. The location of the mesic-frigid (M-F) line is particularly difficult to determine where east-west gradients in air temperature cross north-south trends in snowfall due to Lake Michigan. Additionally, the soil temperature regime of several Great Lakes' peninsulas near the M-F line is in question. To determine the accuracy of our soil temperature model, soil temperature data output from it were compared with data derived from thermocouples implanted in soils at 39 sites in northern Michigan that had been collecting data several times daily for more than 6 yr. Error statistics for the model show that it has essentially no mean bias when examined on an annual basis or for winter, and only a bias of 0.1°C for the warm season. The M-F line in Wisconsin and Michigan is slightly north of most previously estimated locations, and is strongly influenced by the snowbelt in southern Michigan. Soils in deep snow areas stay warmer in winter than do soils inland, increasing their MAST and forcing the M-F line north of where air temperatures alone might have placed if. Lake-effect areas also stay cold longer into the spring season, and cool down more slowly in fall. Soil temperatures in these areas are, therefore, more moderated on an annual basis, as indicated by coefficients of variation.

AB - Understanding the spatial and temporal variation in soil temperatures is important to classification, land use, and management. To that end, mean annual soil temperature (MAST) data for Wisconsin and Michigan were modeled to (i) determine the effects of the Great Lakes and their snowbelts on soil temperatures, and (ii) better estimate the location of the boundary between the mesic and frigid soil temperature regimes in this region. The location of the mesic-frigid (M-F) line is particularly difficult to determine where east-west gradients in air temperature cross north-south trends in snowfall due to Lake Michigan. Additionally, the soil temperature regime of several Great Lakes' peninsulas near the M-F line is in question. To determine the accuracy of our soil temperature model, soil temperature data output from it were compared with data derived from thermocouples implanted in soils at 39 sites in northern Michigan that had been collecting data several times daily for more than 6 yr. Error statistics for the model show that it has essentially no mean bias when examined on an annual basis or for winter, and only a bias of 0.1°C for the warm season. The M-F line in Wisconsin and Michigan is slightly north of most previously estimated locations, and is strongly influenced by the snowbelt in southern Michigan. Soils in deep snow areas stay warmer in winter than do soils inland, increasing their MAST and forcing the M-F line north of where air temperatures alone might have placed if. Lake-effect areas also stay cold longer into the spring season, and cool down more slowly in fall. Soil temperatures in these areas are, therefore, more moderated on an annual basis, as indicated by coefficients of variation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27644593882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27644593882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2136/sssaj2004.0349

DO - 10.2136/sssaj2004.0349

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:27644593882

VL - 69

SP - 2033

EP - 2040

JO - Soil Science Society of America Journal

JF - Soil Science Society of America Journal

SN - 0361-5995

IS - 6

ER -