Modeling strategy of the source and sink terms in the two-group interfacial area transport equation

Mamoru Ishii, Xiaodong Sun, Seungjin Kim

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper presents the general strategy for modeling the source and sink terms in the two-group interfacial area transport equation. The two-group transport equation is applicable in bubbly, cap bubbly, slug, and churn-turbulent flow regimes to predict the change of the interfacial area concentration. This dynamic approach has an advantage of flow regime-independence over the conventional empirical correlation approach for the interfacial area concentration in the applications with the two-fluid model. In the two-group interfacial area transport equation, bubbles are categorized into two groups: spherical/distorted bubbles as Group 1 and cap/slug/churn-turbulent bubbles as Group 2. Thus, two sets of equations are used to describe the generation and destruction rates of bubble number density, void fraction, and interfacial area concentration for the two groups of bubbles due to bubble expansion and compression, coalescence and disintegration, and phase change. Based upon a detailed literature review of the research on the bubble interactions, five major bubble interaction mechanisms are identified for the gas-liquid two-phase flow of interest. A systematic integral approach, in which the significant variations of bubble volume and shape are accounted for, is suggested for the modeling of two-group bubble interactions. To obtain analytical forms for the various bubble interactions, a simplification is made for the bubble number density distribution function.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1309-1331
    Number of pages23
    JournalAnnals of Nuclear Energy
    Volume30
    Issue number13
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 1 2003

    Fingerprint

    Bubbles (in fluids)
    Void fraction
    Disintegration
    Coalescence
    Two phase flow
    Probability density function
    Turbulent flow
    Distribution functions
    Fluids
    Liquids
    Gases

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Nuclear Energy and Engineering

    Cite this

    Ishii, Mamoru ; Sun, Xiaodong ; Kim, Seungjin. / Modeling strategy of the source and sink terms in the two-group interfacial area transport equation. In: Annals of Nuclear Energy. 2003 ; Vol. 30, No. 13. pp. 1309-1331.
    @article{fa3c984291ba4fa385c1f92b92d68ec4,
    title = "Modeling strategy of the source and sink terms in the two-group interfacial area transport equation",
    abstract = "This paper presents the general strategy for modeling the source and sink terms in the two-group interfacial area transport equation. The two-group transport equation is applicable in bubbly, cap bubbly, slug, and churn-turbulent flow regimes to predict the change of the interfacial area concentration. This dynamic approach has an advantage of flow regime-independence over the conventional empirical correlation approach for the interfacial area concentration in the applications with the two-fluid model. In the two-group interfacial area transport equation, bubbles are categorized into two groups: spherical/distorted bubbles as Group 1 and cap/slug/churn-turbulent bubbles as Group 2. Thus, two sets of equations are used to describe the generation and destruction rates of bubble number density, void fraction, and interfacial area concentration for the two groups of bubbles due to bubble expansion and compression, coalescence and disintegration, and phase change. Based upon a detailed literature review of the research on the bubble interactions, five major bubble interaction mechanisms are identified for the gas-liquid two-phase flow of interest. A systematic integral approach, in which the significant variations of bubble volume and shape are accounted for, is suggested for the modeling of two-group bubble interactions. To obtain analytical forms for the various bubble interactions, a simplification is made for the bubble number density distribution function.",
    author = "Mamoru Ishii and Xiaodong Sun and Seungjin Kim",
    year = "2003",
    month = "9",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/S0306-4549(03)00075-6",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "1309--1331",
    journal = "Annals of Nuclear Energy",
    issn = "0306-4549",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
    number = "13",

    }

    Modeling strategy of the source and sink terms in the two-group interfacial area transport equation. / Ishii, Mamoru; Sun, Xiaodong; Kim, Seungjin.

    In: Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 30, No. 13, 01.09.2003, p. 1309-1331.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Modeling strategy of the source and sink terms in the two-group interfacial area transport equation

    AU - Ishii, Mamoru

    AU - Sun, Xiaodong

    AU - Kim, Seungjin

    PY - 2003/9/1

    Y1 - 2003/9/1

    N2 - This paper presents the general strategy for modeling the source and sink terms in the two-group interfacial area transport equation. The two-group transport equation is applicable in bubbly, cap bubbly, slug, and churn-turbulent flow regimes to predict the change of the interfacial area concentration. This dynamic approach has an advantage of flow regime-independence over the conventional empirical correlation approach for the interfacial area concentration in the applications with the two-fluid model. In the two-group interfacial area transport equation, bubbles are categorized into two groups: spherical/distorted bubbles as Group 1 and cap/slug/churn-turbulent bubbles as Group 2. Thus, two sets of equations are used to describe the generation and destruction rates of bubble number density, void fraction, and interfacial area concentration for the two groups of bubbles due to bubble expansion and compression, coalescence and disintegration, and phase change. Based upon a detailed literature review of the research on the bubble interactions, five major bubble interaction mechanisms are identified for the gas-liquid two-phase flow of interest. A systematic integral approach, in which the significant variations of bubble volume and shape are accounted for, is suggested for the modeling of two-group bubble interactions. To obtain analytical forms for the various bubble interactions, a simplification is made for the bubble number density distribution function.

    AB - This paper presents the general strategy for modeling the source and sink terms in the two-group interfacial area transport equation. The two-group transport equation is applicable in bubbly, cap bubbly, slug, and churn-turbulent flow regimes to predict the change of the interfacial area concentration. This dynamic approach has an advantage of flow regime-independence over the conventional empirical correlation approach for the interfacial area concentration in the applications with the two-fluid model. In the two-group interfacial area transport equation, bubbles are categorized into two groups: spherical/distorted bubbles as Group 1 and cap/slug/churn-turbulent bubbles as Group 2. Thus, two sets of equations are used to describe the generation and destruction rates of bubble number density, void fraction, and interfacial area concentration for the two groups of bubbles due to bubble expansion and compression, coalescence and disintegration, and phase change. Based upon a detailed literature review of the research on the bubble interactions, five major bubble interaction mechanisms are identified for the gas-liquid two-phase flow of interest. A systematic integral approach, in which the significant variations of bubble volume and shape are accounted for, is suggested for the modeling of two-group bubble interactions. To obtain analytical forms for the various bubble interactions, a simplification is made for the bubble number density distribution function.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038237516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038237516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/S0306-4549(03)00075-6

    DO - 10.1016/S0306-4549(03)00075-6

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:0038237516

    VL - 30

    SP - 1309

    EP - 1331

    JO - Annals of Nuclear Energy

    JF - Annals of Nuclear Energy

    SN - 0306-4549

    IS - 13

    ER -