Modeling the role of networks and individual differences in inter-group violence

Alexander Isakov, Amelia Holcomb, Luke Glowacki, Nicholas A. Christakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is significant heterogeneity within and between populations in their propensity to engage in conflict. Most research has neglected the role of within-group effects in social networks in contributing to between-group violence and focused instead on the precursors and consequences of violence, or on the role of between-group ties. Here, we explore the role of individual variation and of network structure within a population in promoting and inhibiting group violence towards other populations. Motivated by ethnographic observations of collective behavior in a small-scale society, we describe a model with differentiated roles for individuals embedded within friendship networks. Using a simple model based on votinglike dynamics, we explore several strategies for influencing group-level behavior. When we consider changing population level attitude changes and introducing control nodes separately, we find that a particularly effective control strategy relies on exploiting network degree. We also suggest refinements to our model such as tracking fine-grained information spread dynamics that can lead to further enrichment in using evolutionary game theory models for sociological phenomena.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0148314
JournalPloS one
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

violence
Violence
Individuality
Population
Game Theory
interpersonal relationships
game theory
group behavior
social networks
group effect
Game theory
Social Support
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Isakov, Alexander ; Holcomb, Amelia ; Glowacki, Luke ; Christakis, Nicholas A. / Modeling the role of networks and individual differences in inter-group violence. In: PloS one. 2016 ; Vol. 11, No. 2.
@article{39a298f3ca9c4e93abedbd5697ceb8fe,
title = "Modeling the role of networks and individual differences in inter-group violence",
abstract = "There is significant heterogeneity within and between populations in their propensity to engage in conflict. Most research has neglected the role of within-group effects in social networks in contributing to between-group violence and focused instead on the precursors and consequences of violence, or on the role of between-group ties. Here, we explore the role of individual variation and of network structure within a population in promoting and inhibiting group violence towards other populations. Motivated by ethnographic observations of collective behavior in a small-scale society, we describe a model with differentiated roles for individuals embedded within friendship networks. Using a simple model based on votinglike dynamics, we explore several strategies for influencing group-level behavior. When we consider changing population level attitude changes and introducing control nodes separately, we find that a particularly effective control strategy relies on exploiting network degree. We also suggest refinements to our model such as tracking fine-grained information spread dynamics that can lead to further enrichment in using evolutionary game theory models for sociological phenomena.",
author = "Alexander Isakov and Amelia Holcomb and Luke Glowacki and Christakis, {Nicholas A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0148314",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "2",

}

Modeling the role of networks and individual differences in inter-group violence. / Isakov, Alexander; Holcomb, Amelia; Glowacki, Luke; Christakis, Nicholas A.

In: PloS one, Vol. 11, No. 2, e0148314, 01.02.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling the role of networks and individual differences in inter-group violence

AU - Isakov, Alexander

AU - Holcomb, Amelia

AU - Glowacki, Luke

AU - Christakis, Nicholas A.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - There is significant heterogeneity within and between populations in their propensity to engage in conflict. Most research has neglected the role of within-group effects in social networks in contributing to between-group violence and focused instead on the precursors and consequences of violence, or on the role of between-group ties. Here, we explore the role of individual variation and of network structure within a population in promoting and inhibiting group violence towards other populations. Motivated by ethnographic observations of collective behavior in a small-scale society, we describe a model with differentiated roles for individuals embedded within friendship networks. Using a simple model based on votinglike dynamics, we explore several strategies for influencing group-level behavior. When we consider changing population level attitude changes and introducing control nodes separately, we find that a particularly effective control strategy relies on exploiting network degree. We also suggest refinements to our model such as tracking fine-grained information spread dynamics that can lead to further enrichment in using evolutionary game theory models for sociological phenomena.

AB - There is significant heterogeneity within and between populations in their propensity to engage in conflict. Most research has neglected the role of within-group effects in social networks in contributing to between-group violence and focused instead on the precursors and consequences of violence, or on the role of between-group ties. Here, we explore the role of individual variation and of network structure within a population in promoting and inhibiting group violence towards other populations. Motivated by ethnographic observations of collective behavior in a small-scale society, we describe a model with differentiated roles for individuals embedded within friendship networks. Using a simple model based on votinglike dynamics, we explore several strategies for influencing group-level behavior. When we consider changing population level attitude changes and introducing control nodes separately, we find that a particularly effective control strategy relies on exploiting network degree. We also suggest refinements to our model such as tracking fine-grained information spread dynamics that can lead to further enrichment in using evolutionary game theory models for sociological phenomena.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959018303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959018303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0148314

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0148314

M3 - Article

C2 - 26828362

AN - SCOPUS:84959018303

VL - 11

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 2

M1 - e0148314

ER -