Modus Darwin Reconsidered

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Modus Darwin' is the name given by Elliott Sober to a form of argument that he attributes to Darwin in the Origin of Species, and to subsequent evolutionary biologists who have reasoned in the same way. In short, the argument form goes: Similarity, ergo common ancestry. In this article, I review and critique Sober's analysis of Darwin's reasoning. I argue that modus Darwin has serious limitations that make the argument form unsuitable for supporting Darwin's conclusions, and that Darwin did not reason in this way.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-213
Number of pages21
JournalBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Volume69
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Origin of Species
Elliott Sober
Ancestry
Names
Evolutionary

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • Philosophy
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

@article{7d3a666d51f94691b0cd87821814fc92,
title = "Modus Darwin Reconsidered",
abstract = "Modus Darwin' is the name given by Elliott Sober to a form of argument that he attributes to Darwin in the Origin of Species, and to subsequent evolutionary biologists who have reasoned in the same way. In short, the argument form goes: Similarity, ergo common ancestry. In this article, I review and critique Sober's analysis of Darwin's reasoning. I argue that modus Darwin has serious limitations that make the argument form unsuitable for supporting Darwin's conclusions, and that Darwin did not reason in this way.",
author = "Casey Helgeson",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/bjps/axw015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "193--213",
journal = "British Journal for the Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0007-0882",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Modus Darwin Reconsidered. / Helgeson, Casey.

In: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 69, No. 1, 01.03.2018, p. 193-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modus Darwin Reconsidered

AU - Helgeson, Casey

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Modus Darwin' is the name given by Elliott Sober to a form of argument that he attributes to Darwin in the Origin of Species, and to subsequent evolutionary biologists who have reasoned in the same way. In short, the argument form goes: Similarity, ergo common ancestry. In this article, I review and critique Sober's analysis of Darwin's reasoning. I argue that modus Darwin has serious limitations that make the argument form unsuitable for supporting Darwin's conclusions, and that Darwin did not reason in this way.

AB - Modus Darwin' is the name given by Elliott Sober to a form of argument that he attributes to Darwin in the Origin of Species, and to subsequent evolutionary biologists who have reasoned in the same way. In short, the argument form goes: Similarity, ergo common ancestry. In this article, I review and critique Sober's analysis of Darwin's reasoning. I argue that modus Darwin has serious limitations that make the argument form unsuitable for supporting Darwin's conclusions, and that Darwin did not reason in this way.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043322847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043322847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/bjps/axw015

DO - 10.1093/bjps/axw015

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85043322847

VL - 69

SP - 193

EP - 213

JO - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

JF - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

SN - 0007-0882

IS - 1

ER -