### Abstract

The field of property testing studies algorithms that distinguish, using a small number of queries, between inputs which satisfy a given property, and those that are 'far' from satisfying the property. Testing properties that are defined in terms of monotonicity has been extensively investigated, primarily in the context of the monotonicity of a sequence of integers, or the monotonicity of a function over the n-dimensional hypercube {1,⋯,m}^{n}. These works resulted in monotonicity testers whose query complexity is at most polylogarithmic in the size of the domain. We show that in its most general setting, testing that Boolean functions are close to monotone is equivalent, with respect to the number of required queries, to several other testing problems in logic and graph theory. These problems include: testing that a Boolean assignment of variables is close to an assignment that satisfies a specific 2-CNF formula, testing that a set of vertices is close to one that is a vertex cover of a specific graph, and testing that a set of vertices is close to a clique. We then investigate the query complexity of monotonicity testing of both Boolean and integer functions over general partial orders. We give algorithms and lower bounds for the general problem, as well as for some interesting special cases. In proving a general lower bound, we construct graphs with combinatorial properties that may be of independent interest.

Original language | English (US) |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 474-483 |

Number of pages | 10 |

Journal | Conference Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing |

State | Published - Jan 1 2002 |

Event | Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing - Montreal, Que., Canada Duration: May 19 2002 → May 21 2002 |

### All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

- Software

## Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Monotonicity testing over general poset domains'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

## Cite this

*Conference Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing*, 474-483.