Motivational systems and preferences for social support strategies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The behavioral inhibition system (BIS), behavioral approach system (BAS), and fight-flight-freeze system (FFFS) are motivational systems that guide people's behavior. Motivational systems may be relevant to contexts of interpersonal communication, specifically those requiring social support. In these situations, people express preferences for approaching versus avoiding and emotion versus problem-focused comfort. This paper links people's preferences for supportive strategies with their motivational systems. 335 participants reported their preferences for different strategies of social support and their motivational system orientations. As expected, BAS was associated with preferences for involving, problem-focused support. BIS, BAS, and FFFS were significantly associated with emotion-focused support, and FFFS was negatively associated with comfort that downplays affect. The motivational systems interact when manifesting associations with preferences for support strategies, and the BAS reward responsiveness subscale emerged as the most influential BAS subscale. These results indicate that BIS, BAS, and FFFS influence people's preferences in contexts of interpersonal communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)463-474
Number of pages12
JournalMotivation and Emotion
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2014

Fingerprint

Social Support
Emotions
Communication
Reward
Inhibition (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

@article{7ba70ff5d5c04ac3a02096af57350e92,
title = "Motivational systems and preferences for social support strategies",
abstract = "The behavioral inhibition system (BIS), behavioral approach system (BAS), and fight-flight-freeze system (FFFS) are motivational systems that guide people's behavior. Motivational systems may be relevant to contexts of interpersonal communication, specifically those requiring social support. In these situations, people express preferences for approaching versus avoiding and emotion versus problem-focused comfort. This paper links people's preferences for supportive strategies with their motivational systems. 335 participants reported their preferences for different strategies of social support and their motivational system orientations. As expected, BAS was associated with preferences for involving, problem-focused support. BIS, BAS, and FFFS were significantly associated with emotion-focused support, and FFFS was negatively associated with comfort that downplays affect. The motivational systems interact when manifesting associations with preferences for support strategies, and the BAS reward responsiveness subscale emerged as the most influential BAS subscale. These results indicate that BIS, BAS, and FFFS influence people's preferences in contexts of interpersonal communication.",
author = "High, {Andrew C.} and Solomon, {Denise Haunani}",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11031-014-9394-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "463--474",
journal = "Motivation and Emotion",
issn = "0146-7239",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

Motivational systems and preferences for social support strategies. / High, Andrew C.; Solomon, Denise Haunani.

In: Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 38, No. 4, 06.2014, p. 463-474.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motivational systems and preferences for social support strategies

AU - High, Andrew C.

AU - Solomon, Denise Haunani

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - The behavioral inhibition system (BIS), behavioral approach system (BAS), and fight-flight-freeze system (FFFS) are motivational systems that guide people's behavior. Motivational systems may be relevant to contexts of interpersonal communication, specifically those requiring social support. In these situations, people express preferences for approaching versus avoiding and emotion versus problem-focused comfort. This paper links people's preferences for supportive strategies with their motivational systems. 335 participants reported their preferences for different strategies of social support and their motivational system orientations. As expected, BAS was associated with preferences for involving, problem-focused support. BIS, BAS, and FFFS were significantly associated with emotion-focused support, and FFFS was negatively associated with comfort that downplays affect. The motivational systems interact when manifesting associations with preferences for support strategies, and the BAS reward responsiveness subscale emerged as the most influential BAS subscale. These results indicate that BIS, BAS, and FFFS influence people's preferences in contexts of interpersonal communication.

AB - The behavioral inhibition system (BIS), behavioral approach system (BAS), and fight-flight-freeze system (FFFS) are motivational systems that guide people's behavior. Motivational systems may be relevant to contexts of interpersonal communication, specifically those requiring social support. In these situations, people express preferences for approaching versus avoiding and emotion versus problem-focused comfort. This paper links people's preferences for supportive strategies with their motivational systems. 335 participants reported their preferences for different strategies of social support and their motivational system orientations. As expected, BAS was associated with preferences for involving, problem-focused support. BIS, BAS, and FFFS were significantly associated with emotion-focused support, and FFFS was negatively associated with comfort that downplays affect. The motivational systems interact when manifesting associations with preferences for support strategies, and the BAS reward responsiveness subscale emerged as the most influential BAS subscale. These results indicate that BIS, BAS, and FFFS influence people's preferences in contexts of interpersonal communication.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903269003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903269003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11031-014-9394-5

DO - 10.1007/s11031-014-9394-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84903269003

VL - 38

SP - 463

EP - 474

JO - Motivation and Emotion

JF - Motivation and Emotion

SN - 0146-7239

IS - 4

ER -