Multi-input multi-output model-following control design methods for rotorcraft

J. Michael Spires, Joseph Francis Horn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compare two MIMO model-following control design methods for rotorcraft flight control. The first, Explicit Model Following (EMF), employs SISO inverse plants with a dynamic decoupling matrix, which is a purely feedforward approach to inverting the plant. The second is Dynamic Inversion (DI), which involves both feed-forward and feedback path elements to invert the plant. The EMF design is purely linear, while our DI has some nonlinear elements in vertical rate control. For each of these methods, an architecture is presented that provides angular rate model-following with selectable vertical rate model-following. We also cover implementation challenges of both EMF and DI, and present our methods of dealing with them. These two MIMO model-following approaches are evaluated regarding (1) fidelity to the command model, and (2) turbulence rejection. We find that both provide good tracking of commands and reduction of cross coupling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1550-1566
Number of pages17
JournalAnnual Forum Proceedings - AHS International
Volume3
Issue numberJanuary
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

MIMO systems
Turbulence
Feedback

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

@article{edcaf04b758a4963b3d487677f8c8eaa,
title = "Multi-input multi-output model-following control design methods for rotorcraft",
abstract = "We compare two MIMO model-following control design methods for rotorcraft flight control. The first, Explicit Model Following (EMF), employs SISO inverse plants with a dynamic decoupling matrix, which is a purely feedforward approach to inverting the plant. The second is Dynamic Inversion (DI), which involves both feed-forward and feedback path elements to invert the plant. The EMF design is purely linear, while our DI has some nonlinear elements in vertical rate control. For each of these methods, an architecture is presented that provides angular rate model-following with selectable vertical rate model-following. We also cover implementation challenges of both EMF and DI, and present our methods of dealing with them. These two MIMO model-following approaches are evaluated regarding (1) fidelity to the command model, and (2) turbulence rejection. We find that both provide good tracking of commands and reduction of cross coupling.",
author = "{Michael Spires}, J. and Horn, {Joseph Francis}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "1550--1566",
journal = "Annual Forum Proceedings - AHS International",
issn = "1552-2938",
publisher = "American Helicopter Society",
number = "January",

}

Multi-input multi-output model-following control design methods for rotorcraft. / Michael Spires, J.; Horn, Joseph Francis.

In: Annual Forum Proceedings - AHS International, Vol. 3, No. January, 01.01.2015, p. 1550-1566.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-input multi-output model-following control design methods for rotorcraft

AU - Michael Spires, J.

AU - Horn, Joseph Francis

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - We compare two MIMO model-following control design methods for rotorcraft flight control. The first, Explicit Model Following (EMF), employs SISO inverse plants with a dynamic decoupling matrix, which is a purely feedforward approach to inverting the plant. The second is Dynamic Inversion (DI), which involves both feed-forward and feedback path elements to invert the plant. The EMF design is purely linear, while our DI has some nonlinear elements in vertical rate control. For each of these methods, an architecture is presented that provides angular rate model-following with selectable vertical rate model-following. We also cover implementation challenges of both EMF and DI, and present our methods of dealing with them. These two MIMO model-following approaches are evaluated regarding (1) fidelity to the command model, and (2) turbulence rejection. We find that both provide good tracking of commands and reduction of cross coupling.

AB - We compare two MIMO model-following control design methods for rotorcraft flight control. The first, Explicit Model Following (EMF), employs SISO inverse plants with a dynamic decoupling matrix, which is a purely feedforward approach to inverting the plant. The second is Dynamic Inversion (DI), which involves both feed-forward and feedback path elements to invert the plant. The EMF design is purely linear, while our DI has some nonlinear elements in vertical rate control. For each of these methods, an architecture is presented that provides angular rate model-following with selectable vertical rate model-following. We also cover implementation challenges of both EMF and DI, and present our methods of dealing with them. These two MIMO model-following approaches are evaluated regarding (1) fidelity to the command model, and (2) turbulence rejection. We find that both provide good tracking of commands and reduction of cross coupling.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938152335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938152335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 1550

EP - 1566

JO - Annual Forum Proceedings - AHS International

JF - Annual Forum Proceedings - AHS International

SN - 1552-2938

IS - January

ER -