Multi-institutional, prospective, observational study comparing the Gastrografin challenge versus standard treatment in adhesive small bowel obstruction

Martin D. Zielinski, Nadeem N. Haddad, Daniel C. Cullinane, Kenji Inaba, Dante D. Yeh, Salina Wydo, David Turay, Andrea Pakula, Therese M. Duane, Jill Watras, Kenneth A. Widom, John Cull, Carlos J. Rodriguez, Eric A. Toschlog, Valerie G. Sams, Joshua P. Hazelton, John Christopher Graybill, Ruby Skinner, Ji Ming Yune

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Existing trials studying the use of Gastrografin for management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) are limited by methodological flaws and small sample sizes. We compared institutional protocols with and without Gastrografin (GG), hypothesizing that a SBO management protocol utilizing GG is associated with lesser rates of exploration, shorter length of stay, and fewer complications. METHODS A multi-institutional, prospective, observational study was performed on patients appropriate for GG with adhesive SBO. Exclusion criteria were internal/external hernia, signs of strangulation, history of abdominal/pelvic malignancy, or exploration within the past 6 weeks. Patients receiving GG were compared to patients receiving standard care without GG. RESULTS Overall, 316 patients were included (58 ± 18 years; 53% male). There were 173 (55%) patients in the GG group (of whom 118 [75%] successfully passed) and 143 patients in the non-GG group. There were no differences in duration of obstipation (1.6 vs. 1.9 days, p = 0.77) or small bowel feces sign (32.9% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.14). Fewer patients in the GG protocol cohort had mesenteric edema on CT (16.3% vs. 29.9%; p = 0.009). There was a lower rate of bowel resection (6.9% vs. 21.0%, p < 0.001) and exploration rate in the GG group (20.8% vs. 44.1%, p < 0.0001). GG patients had a shorter duration of hospital stay (4 IQR 2-7 vs. 5 days IQR 2-12; p = 0.036) and a similar rate of complications (12.5% vs. 17.9%; p = 0.20). Multivariable analysis revealed that GG was independently associated with successful nonoperative management. CONCLUSION Patients receiving Gastrografin for adhesive SBO had lower rates of exploration and shorter hospital length of stay compared to patients who did not receive GG. Adequately powered and well-designed randomized trials are required to confirm these findings and establish causality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, level III.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-54
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume83
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-institutional, prospective, observational study comparing the Gastrografin challenge versus standard treatment in adhesive small bowel obstruction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Zielinski, M. D., Haddad, N. N., Cullinane, D. C., Inaba, K., Yeh, D. D., Wydo, S., Turay, D., Pakula, A., Duane, T. M., Watras, J., Widom, K. A., Cull, J., Rodriguez, C. J., Toschlog, E. A., Sams, V. G., Hazelton, J. P., Graybill, J. C., Skinner, R., & Yune, J. M. (2017). Multi-institutional, prospective, observational study comparing the Gastrografin challenge versus standard treatment in adhesive small bowel obstruction. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 83(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001499