TY - JOUR
T1 - Multi-objective optimization of demand response in a datacenter with lithium-ion battery storage
AU - Mamun, A.
AU - Narayanan, I.
AU - Wang, D.
AU - Sivasubramaniam, A.
AU - Fathy, H. K.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is supported by National Science Foundation grant CNS-130222 5, “CSR: medium: Provisioning and Harnessing Energy Storage for Datacenter Demand Response”. The authors gratefully acknowledge this support. The authors would also like to thank Kushagra Vaid from Cloud Server Infrastructure team in Microsoft for providing power traces for validating the battery model.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2016/8/1
Y1 - 2016/8/1
N2 - This article optimizes lithium-ion battery management in a datacenter to: (i) maximize the dollar savings attainable through peak shaving, while (ii) minimizing battery degradation. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, such multi-objective optimal datacenter battery management remains relatively unexplored. We solve this optimization problem using a second-order model of battery charge dynamics, coupled with a physics-based model of battery aging via solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) growth. Our optimization study focuses on a classical feedforward-feedback energy management policy, where feedforward control is used for peak shaving, and feedback is used for tracking a desired battery state of charge (SOC). Three feedforward-feedback architectures are examined: a proportional (P) control architecture, a proportional-integral (PI) architecture, and a PI architecture with a deadband in its feedforward path. We optimize these architectures’ parameters using differential evolution, for real datacenter power demand histories. Our results show a significant Pareto tradeoff between dollar savings and battery longevity for all architectures. The introduction of a deadband furnishes a more attractive Pareto front by allowing the feedforward controller to focus on shaving larger peaks. Moreover, the use of integral control improves the robustness of the feedback policy to demand uncertainties and battery pack sizing.
AB - This article optimizes lithium-ion battery management in a datacenter to: (i) maximize the dollar savings attainable through peak shaving, while (ii) minimizing battery degradation. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, such multi-objective optimal datacenter battery management remains relatively unexplored. We solve this optimization problem using a second-order model of battery charge dynamics, coupled with a physics-based model of battery aging via solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) growth. Our optimization study focuses on a classical feedforward-feedback energy management policy, where feedforward control is used for peak shaving, and feedback is used for tracking a desired battery state of charge (SOC). Three feedforward-feedback architectures are examined: a proportional (P) control architecture, a proportional-integral (PI) architecture, and a PI architecture with a deadband in its feedforward path. We optimize these architectures’ parameters using differential evolution, for real datacenter power demand histories. Our results show a significant Pareto tradeoff between dollar savings and battery longevity for all architectures. The introduction of a deadband furnishes a more attractive Pareto front by allowing the feedforward controller to focus on shaving larger peaks. Moreover, the use of integral control improves the robustness of the feedback policy to demand uncertainties and battery pack sizing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982189692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982189692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.est.2016.08.002
DO - 10.1016/j.est.2016.08.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84982189692
SN - 2352-152X
VL - 7
SP - 258
EP - 269
JO - Journal of Energy Storage
JF - Journal of Energy Storage
ER -