Multidisciplinary design optimization for complex engineered systems design: State of the research and state of the practice - Report from a national science foundation workshop

Timothy William Simpson, Joaquim R.R.A. Martins

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) has evolved remarkably since its inception 25 years ago. Despite these advances, the design of complex engineered systems remains a challenge, and many large-scale engineering projects are routinely plagued by exorbitant cost overruns and delays. To gain insight into these challenges, 48 people gathered from industry, academia, and government agencies to examine MDO's current and future role in designing complex engineered systems. This paper summarizes the views of five distinguished speakers on the "state of the research" along with the discussions from an industry panel of representatives from Boeing, Caterpillar, Ford, NASA Glenn Research Center, and United Technologies Research Center on the "state of the practice". This paper also summarizes the future research topics identified by breakout groups in five key areas: (1) modeling and the design space; (2) metrics, objectives, and requirements; (3) coupling in complex engineered systems; (4) dealing with uncertainty; and (5) people and workflow. Finally, five over-arching themes are offered to advance MDO. First, we need to engage more disciplines outside of engineering and look for opportunities to use MDO outside of its traditional areas. Second, MDO problem formulations must evolve to encompass a wider range of design criteria. Third, we need effective strategies for putting designers "back in the loop" during MDO. Fourth, we need to do a better job of publicizing the successful examples of MDO so that we can improve the "buy in" that is needed to advance MDO in academia, industry, and government agencies. Fifth, we need to better educate our students and practitioners on systems design, optimization, and MDO along with their benefits and drawbacks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2011
Pages835-845
Number of pages11
Volume5
EditionPARTS A AND B
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011
EventASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2011 - Washington, DC, United States
Duration: Aug 28 2011Aug 31 2011

Other

OtherASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2011
CountryUnited States
CityWashington, DC
Period8/28/118/31/11

Fingerprint

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization
System Design
Large scale systems
Complex Systems
Systems analysis
Industry
Engineering
Caterpillar
Design optimization
NASA
Work Flow
Optimization Problem
Uncertainty
Metric
Students
Formulation
Requirements

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

Cite this

Simpson, T. W., & Martins, J. R. R. A. (2011). Multidisciplinary design optimization for complex engineered systems design: State of the research and state of the practice - Report from a national science foundation workshop. In ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2011 (PARTS A AND B ed., Vol. 5, pp. 835-845) https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2011-47237
Simpson, Timothy William ; Martins, Joaquim R.R.A. / Multidisciplinary design optimization for complex engineered systems design : State of the research and state of the practice - Report from a national science foundation workshop. ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2011. Vol. 5 PARTS A AND B. ed. 2011. pp. 835-845
@inproceedings{fdca5b8a4a7844df981733a439b00e42,
title = "Multidisciplinary design optimization for complex engineered systems design: State of the research and state of the practice - Report from a national science foundation workshop",
abstract = "Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) has evolved remarkably since its inception 25 years ago. Despite these advances, the design of complex engineered systems remains a challenge, and many large-scale engineering projects are routinely plagued by exorbitant cost overruns and delays. To gain insight into these challenges, 48 people gathered from industry, academia, and government agencies to examine MDO's current and future role in designing complex engineered systems. This paper summarizes the views of five distinguished speakers on the {"}state of the research{"} along with the discussions from an industry panel of representatives from Boeing, Caterpillar, Ford, NASA Glenn Research Center, and United Technologies Research Center on the {"}state of the practice{"}. This paper also summarizes the future research topics identified by breakout groups in five key areas: (1) modeling and the design space; (2) metrics, objectives, and requirements; (3) coupling in complex engineered systems; (4) dealing with uncertainty; and (5) people and workflow. Finally, five over-arching themes are offered to advance MDO. First, we need to engage more disciplines outside of engineering and look for opportunities to use MDO outside of its traditional areas. Second, MDO problem formulations must evolve to encompass a wider range of design criteria. Third, we need effective strategies for putting designers {"}back in the loop{"} during MDO. Fourth, we need to do a better job of publicizing the successful examples of MDO so that we can improve the {"}buy in{"} that is needed to advance MDO in academia, industry, and government agencies. Fifth, we need to better educate our students and practitioners on systems design, optimization, and MDO along with their benefits and drawbacks.",
author = "Simpson, {Timothy William} and Martins, {Joaquim R.R.A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/DETC2011-47237",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780791854822",
volume = "5",
pages = "835--845",
booktitle = "ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2011",
edition = "PARTS A AND B",

}

Simpson, TW & Martins, JRRA 2011, Multidisciplinary design optimization for complex engineered systems design: State of the research and state of the practice - Report from a national science foundation workshop. in ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2011. PARTS A AND B edn, vol. 5, pp. 835-845, ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2011, Washington, DC, United States, 8/28/11. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2011-47237

Multidisciplinary design optimization for complex engineered systems design : State of the research and state of the practice - Report from a national science foundation workshop. / Simpson, Timothy William; Martins, Joaquim R.R.A.

ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2011. Vol. 5 PARTS A AND B. ed. 2011. p. 835-845.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Multidisciplinary design optimization for complex engineered systems design

T2 - State of the research and state of the practice - Report from a national science foundation workshop

AU - Simpson, Timothy William

AU - Martins, Joaquim R.R.A.

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) has evolved remarkably since its inception 25 years ago. Despite these advances, the design of complex engineered systems remains a challenge, and many large-scale engineering projects are routinely plagued by exorbitant cost overruns and delays. To gain insight into these challenges, 48 people gathered from industry, academia, and government agencies to examine MDO's current and future role in designing complex engineered systems. This paper summarizes the views of five distinguished speakers on the "state of the research" along with the discussions from an industry panel of representatives from Boeing, Caterpillar, Ford, NASA Glenn Research Center, and United Technologies Research Center on the "state of the practice". This paper also summarizes the future research topics identified by breakout groups in five key areas: (1) modeling and the design space; (2) metrics, objectives, and requirements; (3) coupling in complex engineered systems; (4) dealing with uncertainty; and (5) people and workflow. Finally, five over-arching themes are offered to advance MDO. First, we need to engage more disciplines outside of engineering and look for opportunities to use MDO outside of its traditional areas. Second, MDO problem formulations must evolve to encompass a wider range of design criteria. Third, we need effective strategies for putting designers "back in the loop" during MDO. Fourth, we need to do a better job of publicizing the successful examples of MDO so that we can improve the "buy in" that is needed to advance MDO in academia, industry, and government agencies. Fifth, we need to better educate our students and practitioners on systems design, optimization, and MDO along with their benefits and drawbacks.

AB - Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) has evolved remarkably since its inception 25 years ago. Despite these advances, the design of complex engineered systems remains a challenge, and many large-scale engineering projects are routinely plagued by exorbitant cost overruns and delays. To gain insight into these challenges, 48 people gathered from industry, academia, and government agencies to examine MDO's current and future role in designing complex engineered systems. This paper summarizes the views of five distinguished speakers on the "state of the research" along with the discussions from an industry panel of representatives from Boeing, Caterpillar, Ford, NASA Glenn Research Center, and United Technologies Research Center on the "state of the practice". This paper also summarizes the future research topics identified by breakout groups in five key areas: (1) modeling and the design space; (2) metrics, objectives, and requirements; (3) coupling in complex engineered systems; (4) dealing with uncertainty; and (5) people and workflow. Finally, five over-arching themes are offered to advance MDO. First, we need to engage more disciplines outside of engineering and look for opportunities to use MDO outside of its traditional areas. Second, MDO problem formulations must evolve to encompass a wider range of design criteria. Third, we need effective strategies for putting designers "back in the loop" during MDO. Fourth, we need to do a better job of publicizing the successful examples of MDO so that we can improve the "buy in" that is needed to advance MDO in academia, industry, and government agencies. Fifth, we need to better educate our students and practitioners on systems design, optimization, and MDO along with their benefits and drawbacks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863588298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863588298&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/DETC2011-47237

DO - 10.1115/DETC2011-47237

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84863588298

SN - 9780791854822

VL - 5

SP - 835

EP - 845

BT - ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2011

ER -

Simpson TW, Martins JRRA. Multidisciplinary design optimization for complex engineered systems design: State of the research and state of the practice - Report from a national science foundation workshop. In ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2011. PARTS A AND B ed. Vol. 5. 2011. p. 835-845 https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2011-47237