Multiple goals or deterrence

A test of two models in nuclear and nonnuclear alliances

Glenn Hunter Palmer, J. Sky David

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The functions of international alliances are investigated by testing two models of state behavior with data drawn from nuclear and nonnuclear alliances since 1860. A diversity-of-goals model is based on Morrow's assumption that states pursue two goals through their foreign policies: autonomy and security. The second is the Olson-Zeckhauser theory that alliances provide a collective good to their members. The diversity-of-goals model sees alliances as mechanisms for states to transfer desired foreign policy goals, so that different states join alliances for different reasons. Asymmetrical alliances are mutually preferred arrangements between or among states where different goals are traded and are more likely to work when punishment of defection is credibly threatened. Accordingly, the diversity-of-goals model should find support only in nonnuclear alliances. The Olson-Zeckhauser model should apply more to nuclear alliances. The statistical results support the hypotheses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)748-770
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

Fingerprint

goal model
deterrence
foreign policy
penalty
autonomy
Deterrence
Alliances

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{6827177248494033a2602454e24993f4,
title = "Multiple goals or deterrence: A test of two models in nuclear and nonnuclear alliances",
abstract = "The functions of international alliances are investigated by testing two models of state behavior with data drawn from nuclear and nonnuclear alliances since 1860. A diversity-of-goals model is based on Morrow's assumption that states pursue two goals through their foreign policies: autonomy and security. The second is the Olson-Zeckhauser theory that alliances provide a collective good to their members. The diversity-of-goals model sees alliances as mechanisms for states to transfer desired foreign policy goals, so that different states join alliances for different reasons. Asymmetrical alliances are mutually preferred arrangements between or among states where different goals are traded and are more likely to work when punishment of defection is credibly threatened. Accordingly, the diversity-of-goals model should find support only in nonnuclear alliances. The Olson-Zeckhauser model should apply more to nuclear alliances. The statistical results support the hypotheses.",
author = "Palmer, {Glenn Hunter} and David, {J. Sky}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022002799043006004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "748--770",
journal = "Journal of Conflict Resolution",
issn = "0022-0027",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Multiple goals or deterrence : A test of two models in nuclear and nonnuclear alliances. / Palmer, Glenn Hunter; David, J. Sky.

In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 43, No. 6, 01.01.1999, p. 748-770.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple goals or deterrence

T2 - A test of two models in nuclear and nonnuclear alliances

AU - Palmer, Glenn Hunter

AU - David, J. Sky

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - The functions of international alliances are investigated by testing two models of state behavior with data drawn from nuclear and nonnuclear alliances since 1860. A diversity-of-goals model is based on Morrow's assumption that states pursue two goals through their foreign policies: autonomy and security. The second is the Olson-Zeckhauser theory that alliances provide a collective good to their members. The diversity-of-goals model sees alliances as mechanisms for states to transfer desired foreign policy goals, so that different states join alliances for different reasons. Asymmetrical alliances are mutually preferred arrangements between or among states where different goals are traded and are more likely to work when punishment of defection is credibly threatened. Accordingly, the diversity-of-goals model should find support only in nonnuclear alliances. The Olson-Zeckhauser model should apply more to nuclear alliances. The statistical results support the hypotheses.

AB - The functions of international alliances are investigated by testing two models of state behavior with data drawn from nuclear and nonnuclear alliances since 1860. A diversity-of-goals model is based on Morrow's assumption that states pursue two goals through their foreign policies: autonomy and security. The second is the Olson-Zeckhauser theory that alliances provide a collective good to their members. The diversity-of-goals model sees alliances as mechanisms for states to transfer desired foreign policy goals, so that different states join alliances for different reasons. Asymmetrical alliances are mutually preferred arrangements between or among states where different goals are traded and are more likely to work when punishment of defection is credibly threatened. Accordingly, the diversity-of-goals model should find support only in nonnuclear alliances. The Olson-Zeckhauser model should apply more to nuclear alliances. The statistical results support the hypotheses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033264110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033264110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022002799043006004

DO - 10.1177/0022002799043006004

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 748

EP - 770

JO - Journal of Conflict Resolution

JF - Journal of Conflict Resolution

SN - 0022-0027

IS - 6

ER -