Multistakeholder perspectives on composite measures of ambulatory care quality: A qualitative descriptive study

Grant R. Martsolf, Dennis Patrick Scanlon, Jon B. Christianson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The development of composite measures of ambulatory care quality is an area of growing practice and policy interest. Using 29 semistructured interviews, this study describes the opinions of stakeholders related to the use and development of composite measures in a multistakeholder setting. Research experts working in multistakeholder settings need to understand the perspective of various stakeholders, many of whom have varying levels of research expertise, in order to develop useful and acceptable composite measures. Findings from this study suggest that to achieve maximal stakeholder buy-in, research experts should focus on clinical area-specific composites that are designed and constructed in a simple and transparent manner. However, composite measures are not a panacea for improving the utility of public reporting. Performance measure and report card creators should continue to investigate other ways to improve the user-friendliness of their reports and to address other barriers that prevent more extensive use of reports.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)434-448
Number of pages15
JournalMedical Care Research and Review
Volume70
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2013

Fingerprint

Ambulatory Care
Research
Interviews

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{533fe9dfa272412ebd46d7dee50b46bc,
title = "Multistakeholder perspectives on composite measures of ambulatory care quality: A qualitative descriptive study",
abstract = "The development of composite measures of ambulatory care quality is an area of growing practice and policy interest. Using 29 semistructured interviews, this study describes the opinions of stakeholders related to the use and development of composite measures in a multistakeholder setting. Research experts working in multistakeholder settings need to understand the perspective of various stakeholders, many of whom have varying levels of research expertise, in order to develop useful and acceptable composite measures. Findings from this study suggest that to achieve maximal stakeholder buy-in, research experts should focus on clinical area-specific composites that are designed and constructed in a simple and transparent manner. However, composite measures are not a panacea for improving the utility of public reporting. Performance measure and report card creators should continue to investigate other ways to improve the user-friendliness of their reports and to address other barriers that prevent more extensive use of reports.",
author = "Martsolf, {Grant R.} and Scanlon, {Dennis Patrick} and Christianson, {Jon B.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1077558713485134",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "434--448",
journal = "Medical Care Research and Review",
issn = "1077-5587",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Multistakeholder perspectives on composite measures of ambulatory care quality : A qualitative descriptive study. / Martsolf, Grant R.; Scanlon, Dennis Patrick; Christianson, Jon B.

In: Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 70, No. 4, 01.08.2013, p. 434-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multistakeholder perspectives on composite measures of ambulatory care quality

T2 - A qualitative descriptive study

AU - Martsolf, Grant R.

AU - Scanlon, Dennis Patrick

AU - Christianson, Jon B.

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - The development of composite measures of ambulatory care quality is an area of growing practice and policy interest. Using 29 semistructured interviews, this study describes the opinions of stakeholders related to the use and development of composite measures in a multistakeholder setting. Research experts working in multistakeholder settings need to understand the perspective of various stakeholders, many of whom have varying levels of research expertise, in order to develop useful and acceptable composite measures. Findings from this study suggest that to achieve maximal stakeholder buy-in, research experts should focus on clinical area-specific composites that are designed and constructed in a simple and transparent manner. However, composite measures are not a panacea for improving the utility of public reporting. Performance measure and report card creators should continue to investigate other ways to improve the user-friendliness of their reports and to address other barriers that prevent more extensive use of reports.

AB - The development of composite measures of ambulatory care quality is an area of growing practice and policy interest. Using 29 semistructured interviews, this study describes the opinions of stakeholders related to the use and development of composite measures in a multistakeholder setting. Research experts working in multistakeholder settings need to understand the perspective of various stakeholders, many of whom have varying levels of research expertise, in order to develop useful and acceptable composite measures. Findings from this study suggest that to achieve maximal stakeholder buy-in, research experts should focus on clinical area-specific composites that are designed and constructed in a simple and transparent manner. However, composite measures are not a panacea for improving the utility of public reporting. Performance measure and report card creators should continue to investigate other ways to improve the user-friendliness of their reports and to address other barriers that prevent more extensive use of reports.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880420108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880420108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1077558713485134

DO - 10.1177/1077558713485134

M3 - Article

C2 - 23625664

AN - SCOPUS:84880420108

VL - 70

SP - 434

EP - 448

JO - Medical Care Research and Review

JF - Medical Care Research and Review

SN - 1077-5587

IS - 4

ER -