Muzzling the watchdog: The case of disappearing watchdog journalism from Argentine mainstream news

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What silences an emergent watchdog press, even after that press has overcome great adversity to bring a form of journalism to mainstream news supporting democratization and social justice? Argentina presents an interesting case study in terms of changes in watchdog performance in a democratic and market-oriented context. A content analysis of three major Argentine news outlets from 1985 to 2005 first demonstrates that observable changes have taken place in mainstream watchdog reporting. Then, from interviews with journalists, media managers and media analysts, results indicate perceptions that public opinion shifts, media economy fluctuations, organizational strategies and government media relations facilitated or hindered the free practice of watchdog journalism in mainstream media. These findings illustrate the effects of forces working at the institutional and individual level that influence media performance, rather than simply at the environmental. Rather than a paradox, the Argentine case has implications for press freedom in other democracies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)750-774
Number of pages25
JournalJournalism
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008

Fingerprint

journalism
Managers
news
media economy
media relations
journalist
Argentina
social justice
fluctuation
democratization
public opinion
performance
content analysis
manager
democracy
Journalism
News
market
interview

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{ab982d9b25aa45c2984bef2f2914b9fe,
title = "Muzzling the watchdog: The case of disappearing watchdog journalism from Argentine mainstream news",
abstract = "What silences an emergent watchdog press, even after that press has overcome great adversity to bring a form of journalism to mainstream news supporting democratization and social justice? Argentina presents an interesting case study in terms of changes in watchdog performance in a democratic and market-oriented context. A content analysis of three major Argentine news outlets from 1985 to 2005 first demonstrates that observable changes have taken place in mainstream watchdog reporting. Then, from interviews with journalists, media managers and media analysts, results indicate perceptions that public opinion shifts, media economy fluctuations, organizational strategies and government media relations facilitated or hindered the free practice of watchdog journalism in mainstream media. These findings illustrate the effects of forces working at the institutional and individual level that influence media performance, rather than simply at the environmental. Rather than a paradox, the Argentine case has implications for press freedom in other democracies.",
author = "Juliet Pinto",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1464884908096244",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "750--774",
journal = "Journalism",
issn = "1464-8849",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Muzzling the watchdog : The case of disappearing watchdog journalism from Argentine mainstream news. / Pinto, Juliet.

In: Journalism, Vol. 9, No. 6, 01.12.2008, p. 750-774.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Muzzling the watchdog

T2 - The case of disappearing watchdog journalism from Argentine mainstream news

AU - Pinto, Juliet

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - What silences an emergent watchdog press, even after that press has overcome great adversity to bring a form of journalism to mainstream news supporting democratization and social justice? Argentina presents an interesting case study in terms of changes in watchdog performance in a democratic and market-oriented context. A content analysis of three major Argentine news outlets from 1985 to 2005 first demonstrates that observable changes have taken place in mainstream watchdog reporting. Then, from interviews with journalists, media managers and media analysts, results indicate perceptions that public opinion shifts, media economy fluctuations, organizational strategies and government media relations facilitated or hindered the free practice of watchdog journalism in mainstream media. These findings illustrate the effects of forces working at the institutional and individual level that influence media performance, rather than simply at the environmental. Rather than a paradox, the Argentine case has implications for press freedom in other democracies.

AB - What silences an emergent watchdog press, even after that press has overcome great adversity to bring a form of journalism to mainstream news supporting democratization and social justice? Argentina presents an interesting case study in terms of changes in watchdog performance in a democratic and market-oriented context. A content analysis of three major Argentine news outlets from 1985 to 2005 first demonstrates that observable changes have taken place in mainstream watchdog reporting. Then, from interviews with journalists, media managers and media analysts, results indicate perceptions that public opinion shifts, media economy fluctuations, organizational strategies and government media relations facilitated or hindered the free practice of watchdog journalism in mainstream media. These findings illustrate the effects of forces working at the institutional and individual level that influence media performance, rather than simply at the environmental. Rather than a paradox, the Argentine case has implications for press freedom in other democracies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61049558295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61049558295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1464884908096244

DO - 10.1177/1464884908096244

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:61049558295

VL - 9

SP - 750

EP - 774

JO - Journalism

JF - Journalism

SN - 1464-8849

IS - 6

ER -