Natural or Artificial: Is the Route of L2 Development Teachable?

Xian Zhang, James P. Lantolf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

The current study was designed to assess the central claim of the Teachability Hypothesis (TH), a corollary of general Processability Theory (PT), which predicts instruction cannot alter posited universal, hierarchically organized psycholinguistic constraints behind PT's developmental sequences. We employed an interventional design, which adhered to instructional procedures of Systemic Theoretical Instruction, and we taught four university learners at Stage 2 (subject-verb-object) Chinese topicalization for Stage 4 (object-first, e.g., Pizza tā yě chī le, Pizza, 'Pizza he also ate'). We believe the findings show that, under the instructional conditions utilized in the study, the predictions of TH do not hold. We conclude it is possible to artificially construct a developmental route different from the one predicted by natural developmental sequences, in agreement with the claims of Vygotsky's developmental education.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)152-180
Number of pages29
JournalLanguage Learning
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Natural or Artificial: Is the Route of L2 Development Teachable?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this