Negotiating the labyrinth from margin to center: Adult degree program administrators as program planners within higher education institutions

Bryan J. Watkins, Elizabeth Jean Tisdell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

This qualitative study examined how eight adult degree program administrators negotiate power and interest while planning programs in specific higher education settings: small, private, non-profit, higher education institutions. The conceptual framework was grounded in Cervero and Wilson's program-planning model in combination with Bourdieu's concept of cultural and social capital and Raven's consideration of types of power at play in organizations. The primary means of data collection were in-depth interviews and qualitative questionnaires. There were four primary categories of findings dealing with how these adult degree program planners negotiate power and interest, centering on (a) moving the institutional interest in adult learners from the margins closer to the center, (b) gaining influence by drawing on multiple forms of capital, (c) building a bridge of common interests among key players as a way of leveraging power, and (d) balancing institutional expectations for growth with resource limitations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)134-159
Number of pages26
JournalAdult Education Quarterly
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2006

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Negotiating the labyrinth from margin to center: Adult degree program administrators as program planners within higher education institutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this