Neighborhood context, police legitimacy and willingness to help the police in Shanghai, China

Siyu Liu, Yuning Wu, Ivan Sun, Feng Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Following social disorganization theory and the process-based model of policing, the present study aims to examine how characteristics of communities are meaningful in shaping citizens' willingness to work with the police in urban China. Design/methodology/approach: Based on survey data from Shanghai, China, the study adopts a generalized hierarchical linear modeling (GHLM) approach to examine the effects of both individual- and neighborhood-level predictors on the outcome, while taking into consideration the unobserved additional neighborhood-level variations. Findings: Results suggest potential need of the process-based model to be modified in a Chinese context in that while police presence matters, measures on legitimacy are nonsignificant in shaping willingness to help the police, after controlling for neighborhood characteristics. More importantly, collective efficacy at the neighborhood level is related positively to residents' willingness to work with the police. Constant attention should be paid to the promotion of a collaborative and collectively caring environment, which can contribute to better coordination with the police, and greater willingness to be part of the larger cause of public safety. Originality/value: The paper advances the scholarship with multi-level modeling and the role of communities in building stronger relationship with the police.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)947-962
Number of pages16
JournalPolicing
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 23 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Public Administration
  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Neighborhood context, police legitimacy and willingness to help the police in Shanghai, China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this