Neoliberalism, the University, Public Goods and Agricultural Innovation

Leland Luther Glenna, Sally Shortall, Barbara Brandl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

After World War II, most industrialising nations adopted some form of welfare-state approach to balance the economic activities of self-interested agents and social welfare. In the realm of scientific research and innovation, this often meant that governments took primary responsibility for funding public research organisations, including research universities and government laboratories. Over the past four decades, however, the significance of private funding for agricultural research has increased, and academic scientists now often work in public-private partnerships. We argue that this trend needs to be carefully monitored because public goods are likely to be overlooked and undervalued in such arrangements. In the interest of developing indicators to monitor the trend, we document public and private funding for agricultural research and agricultural innovation in four countries: the USA, the UK, Ireland and Germany. Our results show that although neoliberalism is evident in each country, it is not homogeneous in its application and impacts, suggesting that national and institutional contexts matter. This article is directed at stimulating debates on the relationships between university research, agricultural innovation and public goods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)438-459
Number of pages22
JournalSociologia Ruralis
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

neoliberalism
funding
innovation
organization research
research organization
university research
public private partnership
trend
social welfare
welfare state
World War II
Ireland
responsibility
university
economics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Glenna, Leland Luther ; Shortall, Sally ; Brandl, Barbara. / Neoliberalism, the University, Public Goods and Agricultural Innovation. In: Sociologia Ruralis. 2015 ; Vol. 55, No. 4. pp. 438-459.
@article{3931fd06c6a04b578944053c3412be01,
title = "Neoliberalism, the University, Public Goods and Agricultural Innovation",
abstract = "After World War II, most industrialising nations adopted some form of welfare-state approach to balance the economic activities of self-interested agents and social welfare. In the realm of scientific research and innovation, this often meant that governments took primary responsibility for funding public research organisations, including research universities and government laboratories. Over the past four decades, however, the significance of private funding for agricultural research has increased, and academic scientists now often work in public-private partnerships. We argue that this trend needs to be carefully monitored because public goods are likely to be overlooked and undervalued in such arrangements. In the interest of developing indicators to monitor the trend, we document public and private funding for agricultural research and agricultural innovation in four countries: the USA, the UK, Ireland and Germany. Our results show that although neoliberalism is evident in each country, it is not homogeneous in its application and impacts, suggesting that national and institutional contexts matter. This article is directed at stimulating debates on the relationships between university research, agricultural innovation and public goods.",
author = "Glenna, {Leland Luther} and Sally Shortall and Barbara Brandl",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/soru.12074",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "438--459",
journal = "Sociologia Ruralis",
issn = "0038-0199",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Neoliberalism, the University, Public Goods and Agricultural Innovation. / Glenna, Leland Luther; Shortall, Sally; Brandl, Barbara.

In: Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 55, No. 4, 01.10.2015, p. 438-459.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neoliberalism, the University, Public Goods and Agricultural Innovation

AU - Glenna, Leland Luther

AU - Shortall, Sally

AU - Brandl, Barbara

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - After World War II, most industrialising nations adopted some form of welfare-state approach to balance the economic activities of self-interested agents and social welfare. In the realm of scientific research and innovation, this often meant that governments took primary responsibility for funding public research organisations, including research universities and government laboratories. Over the past four decades, however, the significance of private funding for agricultural research has increased, and academic scientists now often work in public-private partnerships. We argue that this trend needs to be carefully monitored because public goods are likely to be overlooked and undervalued in such arrangements. In the interest of developing indicators to monitor the trend, we document public and private funding for agricultural research and agricultural innovation in four countries: the USA, the UK, Ireland and Germany. Our results show that although neoliberalism is evident in each country, it is not homogeneous in its application and impacts, suggesting that national and institutional contexts matter. This article is directed at stimulating debates on the relationships between university research, agricultural innovation and public goods.

AB - After World War II, most industrialising nations adopted some form of welfare-state approach to balance the economic activities of self-interested agents and social welfare. In the realm of scientific research and innovation, this often meant that governments took primary responsibility for funding public research organisations, including research universities and government laboratories. Over the past four decades, however, the significance of private funding for agricultural research has increased, and academic scientists now often work in public-private partnerships. We argue that this trend needs to be carefully monitored because public goods are likely to be overlooked and undervalued in such arrangements. In the interest of developing indicators to monitor the trend, we document public and private funding for agricultural research and agricultural innovation in four countries: the USA, the UK, Ireland and Germany. Our results show that although neoliberalism is evident in each country, it is not homogeneous in its application and impacts, suggesting that national and institutional contexts matter. This article is directed at stimulating debates on the relationships between university research, agricultural innovation and public goods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943813420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943813420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/soru.12074

DO - 10.1111/soru.12074

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 438

EP - 459

JO - Sociologia Ruralis

JF - Sociologia Ruralis

SN - 0038-0199

IS - 4

ER -