Neonatal fever in the term infant: Evaluation and management strategies

Joseph M. Geskey, Michael J. Beck, Gretchen L. Brummel

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The presence of fever in the neonatal period demands urgent evaluation from healthcare providers since signs and symptoms of a serious bacterial infection in this age group can be nonspecific. Current practice guidelines recommend that febrile neonates should be presumed to have a serious bacterial infection and undergo a sepsis evaluation and hospitalization until the results of diagnostic testing are known. However, less than 50% of outpatient practitioners in a recent study followed these recommendations without apparent adverse outcomes even though the rate of serious bacterial infections in the neonatal period is higher than febrile infants 1-3 months of age. In this article we examine various clinical scenarios that healthcare providers confront when caring for febrile neonates, including whether febrile neonates with respiratory syncytial virus are at increased risk for developing a serious bacterial infection and whether diagnostic testing and empiric antiviral therapy for herpes simplex virus should be part of the standard evaluation of febrile neonates. Although the discovery of inflammatory mediators that are elevated during the early stages of infection has the potential to improve diagnostic capabilities in this age group, there is enough evidence to support international guidelines recommending hospitalization and sepsis evaluations in febrile neonates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-95
Number of pages12
JournalCurrent Pediatric Reviews
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2008

Fingerprint

Fever
Bacterial Infections
Newborn Infant
Health Personnel
Sepsis
Hospitalization
Age Groups
Respiratory Syncytial Viruses
Simplexvirus
Practice Guidelines
Signs and Symptoms
Antiviral Agents
Outpatients
Guidelines
Infection

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Geskey, Joseph M. ; Beck, Michael J. ; Brummel, Gretchen L. / Neonatal fever in the term infant : Evaluation and management strategies. In: Current Pediatric Reviews. 2008 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 84-95.
@article{e0f2f0f8fc7c48a78e4d3b24cd53a2f7,
title = "Neonatal fever in the term infant: Evaluation and management strategies",
abstract = "The presence of fever in the neonatal period demands urgent evaluation from healthcare providers since signs and symptoms of a serious bacterial infection in this age group can be nonspecific. Current practice guidelines recommend that febrile neonates should be presumed to have a serious bacterial infection and undergo a sepsis evaluation and hospitalization until the results of diagnostic testing are known. However, less than 50{\%} of outpatient practitioners in a recent study followed these recommendations without apparent adverse outcomes even though the rate of serious bacterial infections in the neonatal period is higher than febrile infants 1-3 months of age. In this article we examine various clinical scenarios that healthcare providers confront when caring for febrile neonates, including whether febrile neonates with respiratory syncytial virus are at increased risk for developing a serious bacterial infection and whether diagnostic testing and empiric antiviral therapy for herpes simplex virus should be part of the standard evaluation of febrile neonates. Although the discovery of inflammatory mediators that are elevated during the early stages of infection has the potential to improve diagnostic capabilities in this age group, there is enough evidence to support international guidelines recommending hospitalization and sepsis evaluations in febrile neonates.",
author = "Geskey, {Joseph M.} and Beck, {Michael J.} and Brummel, {Gretchen L.}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2174/157339608784462052",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "84--95",
journal = "Current Pediatric Reviews",
issn = "1573-3963",
publisher = "Bentham Science Publishers B.V.",
number = "2",

}

Neonatal fever in the term infant : Evaluation and management strategies. / Geskey, Joseph M.; Beck, Michael J.; Brummel, Gretchen L.

In: Current Pediatric Reviews, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.05.2008, p. 84-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neonatal fever in the term infant

T2 - Evaluation and management strategies

AU - Geskey, Joseph M.

AU - Beck, Michael J.

AU - Brummel, Gretchen L.

PY - 2008/5/1

Y1 - 2008/5/1

N2 - The presence of fever in the neonatal period demands urgent evaluation from healthcare providers since signs and symptoms of a serious bacterial infection in this age group can be nonspecific. Current practice guidelines recommend that febrile neonates should be presumed to have a serious bacterial infection and undergo a sepsis evaluation and hospitalization until the results of diagnostic testing are known. However, less than 50% of outpatient practitioners in a recent study followed these recommendations without apparent adverse outcomes even though the rate of serious bacterial infections in the neonatal period is higher than febrile infants 1-3 months of age. In this article we examine various clinical scenarios that healthcare providers confront when caring for febrile neonates, including whether febrile neonates with respiratory syncytial virus are at increased risk for developing a serious bacterial infection and whether diagnostic testing and empiric antiviral therapy for herpes simplex virus should be part of the standard evaluation of febrile neonates. Although the discovery of inflammatory mediators that are elevated during the early stages of infection has the potential to improve diagnostic capabilities in this age group, there is enough evidence to support international guidelines recommending hospitalization and sepsis evaluations in febrile neonates.

AB - The presence of fever in the neonatal period demands urgent evaluation from healthcare providers since signs and symptoms of a serious bacterial infection in this age group can be nonspecific. Current practice guidelines recommend that febrile neonates should be presumed to have a serious bacterial infection and undergo a sepsis evaluation and hospitalization until the results of diagnostic testing are known. However, less than 50% of outpatient practitioners in a recent study followed these recommendations without apparent adverse outcomes even though the rate of serious bacterial infections in the neonatal period is higher than febrile infants 1-3 months of age. In this article we examine various clinical scenarios that healthcare providers confront when caring for febrile neonates, including whether febrile neonates with respiratory syncytial virus are at increased risk for developing a serious bacterial infection and whether diagnostic testing and empiric antiviral therapy for herpes simplex virus should be part of the standard evaluation of febrile neonates. Although the discovery of inflammatory mediators that are elevated during the early stages of infection has the potential to improve diagnostic capabilities in this age group, there is enough evidence to support international guidelines recommending hospitalization and sepsis evaluations in febrile neonates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47749151555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=47749151555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2174/157339608784462052

DO - 10.2174/157339608784462052

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:47749151555

VL - 4

SP - 84

EP - 95

JO - Current Pediatric Reviews

JF - Current Pediatric Reviews

SN - 1573-3963

IS - 2

ER -