net A Theoretical Foundation of Rural Development Interventions and Evaluations is Needed La base théorique de l'intervention et l'évaluation du Rural Développement est indispensable Eine theoretische Fundierung von Interventionen und Evaluationen zur Ländlichen Entwicklung ist notwending

Anne Margarian, David Blandford, Berkeley Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary: A Theoretical Foundation of Rural Development Interventions and Evaluations is NeededThis article argues that a lack of critical reflection on the theoretical foundations of policy interventions and evaluations is common in the discussion about evaluation of Rural Development programs. This shortcoming was also apparent in Special Issue 9(1) of EuroChoices. Intimate knowledge of the underlying causal processes is necessary in order to identify appropriate counterfactuals or reference-scenarios. It is only through their comparison with observed development that one can reliably isolate the net-effects of interventions. The current preoccupation with the indicator-based approach is rooted within the existing evaluation system. It hinders a more fundamental criticism of weak theoretical foundations of interventions. Reply by David Blandford and Berkeley HillDespite its limitations the current evaluation process can play an important role in shaping rural development policies in the European Union. While the theoretical content should be strengthened, it would be inadvisable to reject the current CMEF process in favour of an exclusive focus on theory. It is doubtful whether a sufficiently robust and general theory of rural development could be developed and applied to the diversity of rural areas in Europe. Devoting our efforts to improving the existing evaluation process and the indicators that this generates would be more productive in exposing rural development policies to greater scrutiny and improving their effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-39
Number of pages5
JournalEuroChoices
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2010

Fingerprint

rural development
valuation
evaluation
development policy
rural area
European Union
criticism
scenario
lack
policy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

@article{b3b0604e2dc546fd91cb778df26ac9ea,
title = "net A Theoretical Foundation of Rural Development Interventions and Evaluations is Needed La base th{\'e}orique de l'intervention et l'{\'e}valuation du Rural D{\'e}veloppement est indispensable Eine theoretische Fundierung von Interventionen und Evaluationen zur L{\"a}ndlichen Entwicklung ist notwending",
abstract = "Summary: A Theoretical Foundation of Rural Development Interventions and Evaluations is NeededThis article argues that a lack of critical reflection on the theoretical foundations of policy interventions and evaluations is common in the discussion about evaluation of Rural Development programs. This shortcoming was also apparent in Special Issue 9(1) of EuroChoices. Intimate knowledge of the underlying causal processes is necessary in order to identify appropriate counterfactuals or reference-scenarios. It is only through their comparison with observed development that one can reliably isolate the net-effects of interventions. The current preoccupation with the indicator-based approach is rooted within the existing evaluation system. It hinders a more fundamental criticism of weak theoretical foundations of interventions. Reply by David Blandford and Berkeley HillDespite its limitations the current evaluation process can play an important role in shaping rural development policies in the European Union. While the theoretical content should be strengthened, it would be inadvisable to reject the current CMEF process in favour of an exclusive focus on theory. It is doubtful whether a sufficiently robust and general theory of rural development could be developed and applied to the diversity of rural areas in Europe. Devoting our efforts to improving the existing evaluation process and the indicators that this generates would be more productive in exposing rural development policies to greater scrutiny and improving their effectiveness.",
author = "Anne Margarian and David Blandford and Berkeley Hill",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1746-692X.2010.00166.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "35--39",
journal = "EuroChoices",
issn = "1478-0917",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - net A Theoretical Foundation of Rural Development Interventions and Evaluations is Needed La base théorique de l'intervention et l'évaluation du Rural Développement est indispensable Eine theoretische Fundierung von Interventionen und Evaluationen zur Ländlichen Entwicklung ist notwending

AU - Margarian, Anne

AU - Blandford, David

AU - Hill, Berkeley

PY - 2010/8/1

Y1 - 2010/8/1

N2 - Summary: A Theoretical Foundation of Rural Development Interventions and Evaluations is NeededThis article argues that a lack of critical reflection on the theoretical foundations of policy interventions and evaluations is common in the discussion about evaluation of Rural Development programs. This shortcoming was also apparent in Special Issue 9(1) of EuroChoices. Intimate knowledge of the underlying causal processes is necessary in order to identify appropriate counterfactuals or reference-scenarios. It is only through their comparison with observed development that one can reliably isolate the net-effects of interventions. The current preoccupation with the indicator-based approach is rooted within the existing evaluation system. It hinders a more fundamental criticism of weak theoretical foundations of interventions. Reply by David Blandford and Berkeley HillDespite its limitations the current evaluation process can play an important role in shaping rural development policies in the European Union. While the theoretical content should be strengthened, it would be inadvisable to reject the current CMEF process in favour of an exclusive focus on theory. It is doubtful whether a sufficiently robust and general theory of rural development could be developed and applied to the diversity of rural areas in Europe. Devoting our efforts to improving the existing evaluation process and the indicators that this generates would be more productive in exposing rural development policies to greater scrutiny and improving their effectiveness.

AB - Summary: A Theoretical Foundation of Rural Development Interventions and Evaluations is NeededThis article argues that a lack of critical reflection on the theoretical foundations of policy interventions and evaluations is common in the discussion about evaluation of Rural Development programs. This shortcoming was also apparent in Special Issue 9(1) of EuroChoices. Intimate knowledge of the underlying causal processes is necessary in order to identify appropriate counterfactuals or reference-scenarios. It is only through their comparison with observed development that one can reliably isolate the net-effects of interventions. The current preoccupation with the indicator-based approach is rooted within the existing evaluation system. It hinders a more fundamental criticism of weak theoretical foundations of interventions. Reply by David Blandford and Berkeley HillDespite its limitations the current evaluation process can play an important role in shaping rural development policies in the European Union. While the theoretical content should be strengthened, it would be inadvisable to reject the current CMEF process in favour of an exclusive focus on theory. It is doubtful whether a sufficiently robust and general theory of rural development could be developed and applied to the diversity of rural areas in Europe. Devoting our efforts to improving the existing evaluation process and the indicators that this generates would be more productive in exposing rural development policies to greater scrutiny and improving their effectiveness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955407199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955407199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2010.00166.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2010.00166.x

M3 - Letter

VL - 9

SP - 35

EP - 39

JO - EuroChoices

JF - EuroChoices

SN - 1478-0917

IS - 2

ER -