Neurodynamics and connectivity during facial fear perception: The role of threat exposure and signal congruity

Cody A. Cushing, Hee Yeon Im, Reginald Adams, Jr., Noreen Ward, Daniel N. Albohn, Troy G. Steiner, Kestutis Kveraga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fearful faces convey threat cues whose meaning is contextualized by eye gaze: While averted gaze is congruent with facial fear (both signal avoidance), direct gaze (an approach signal) is incongruent with it. We have previously shown using fMRI that the amygdala is engaged more strongly by fear with averted gaze during brief exposures. However, the amygdala also responds more to fear with direct gaze during longer exposures. Here we examined previously unexplored brain oscillatory responses to characterize the neurodynamics and connectivity during brief (~250 ms) and longer (~883 ms) exposures of fearful faces with direct or averted eye gaze. We performed two experiments: one replicating the exposure time by gaze direction interaction in fMRI (N = 23), and another where we confirmed greater early phase locking to averted-gaze fear (congruent threat signal) with MEG (N = 60) in a network of face processing regions, regardless of exposure duration. Phase locking to direct-gaze fear (incongruent threat signal) then increased significantly for brief exposures at ~350 ms, and at ~700 ms for longer exposures. Our results characterize the stages of congruent and incongruent facial threat signal processing and show that stimulus exposure strongly affects the onset and duration of these stages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalScientific reports
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 9 2018

Fingerprint

Fear
Amygdala
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Cues
Brain

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General

Cite this

Cushing, Cody A. ; Im, Hee Yeon ; Adams, Jr., Reginald ; Ward, Noreen ; Albohn, Daniel N. ; Steiner, Troy G. ; Kveraga, Kestutis. / Neurodynamics and connectivity during facial fear perception : The role of threat exposure and signal congruity. In: Scientific reports. 2018 ; Vol. 8, No. 1.
@article{21744b26912244bc95484a3fdf80fe8d,
title = "Neurodynamics and connectivity during facial fear perception: The role of threat exposure and signal congruity",
abstract = "Fearful faces convey threat cues whose meaning is contextualized by eye gaze: While averted gaze is congruent with facial fear (both signal avoidance), direct gaze (an approach signal) is incongruent with it. We have previously shown using fMRI that the amygdala is engaged more strongly by fear with averted gaze during brief exposures. However, the amygdala also responds more to fear with direct gaze during longer exposures. Here we examined previously unexplored brain oscillatory responses to characterize the neurodynamics and connectivity during brief (~250 ms) and longer (~883 ms) exposures of fearful faces with direct or averted eye gaze. We performed two experiments: one replicating the exposure time by gaze direction interaction in fMRI (N = 23), and another where we confirmed greater early phase locking to averted-gaze fear (congruent threat signal) with MEG (N = 60) in a network of face processing regions, regardless of exposure duration. Phase locking to direct-gaze fear (incongruent threat signal) then increased significantly for brief exposures at ~350 ms, and at ~700 ms for longer exposures. Our results characterize the stages of congruent and incongruent facial threat signal processing and show that stimulus exposure strongly affects the onset and duration of these stages.",
author = "Cushing, {Cody A.} and Im, {Hee Yeon} and {Adams, Jr.}, Reginald and Noreen Ward and Albohn, {Daniel N.} and Steiner, {Troy G.} and Kestutis Kveraga",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1038/s41598-018-20509-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Scientific Reports",
issn = "2045-2322",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

Neurodynamics and connectivity during facial fear perception : The role of threat exposure and signal congruity. / Cushing, Cody A.; Im, Hee Yeon; Adams, Jr., Reginald; Ward, Noreen; Albohn, Daniel N.; Steiner, Troy G.; Kveraga, Kestutis.

In: Scientific reports, Vol. 8, No. 1, 09.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neurodynamics and connectivity during facial fear perception

T2 - The role of threat exposure and signal congruity

AU - Cushing, Cody A.

AU - Im, Hee Yeon

AU - Adams, Jr., Reginald

AU - Ward, Noreen

AU - Albohn, Daniel N.

AU - Steiner, Troy G.

AU - Kveraga, Kestutis

PY - 2018/2/9

Y1 - 2018/2/9

N2 - Fearful faces convey threat cues whose meaning is contextualized by eye gaze: While averted gaze is congruent with facial fear (both signal avoidance), direct gaze (an approach signal) is incongruent with it. We have previously shown using fMRI that the amygdala is engaged more strongly by fear with averted gaze during brief exposures. However, the amygdala also responds more to fear with direct gaze during longer exposures. Here we examined previously unexplored brain oscillatory responses to characterize the neurodynamics and connectivity during brief (~250 ms) and longer (~883 ms) exposures of fearful faces with direct or averted eye gaze. We performed two experiments: one replicating the exposure time by gaze direction interaction in fMRI (N = 23), and another where we confirmed greater early phase locking to averted-gaze fear (congruent threat signal) with MEG (N = 60) in a network of face processing regions, regardless of exposure duration. Phase locking to direct-gaze fear (incongruent threat signal) then increased significantly for brief exposures at ~350 ms, and at ~700 ms for longer exposures. Our results characterize the stages of congruent and incongruent facial threat signal processing and show that stimulus exposure strongly affects the onset and duration of these stages.

AB - Fearful faces convey threat cues whose meaning is contextualized by eye gaze: While averted gaze is congruent with facial fear (both signal avoidance), direct gaze (an approach signal) is incongruent with it. We have previously shown using fMRI that the amygdala is engaged more strongly by fear with averted gaze during brief exposures. However, the amygdala also responds more to fear with direct gaze during longer exposures. Here we examined previously unexplored brain oscillatory responses to characterize the neurodynamics and connectivity during brief (~250 ms) and longer (~883 ms) exposures of fearful faces with direct or averted eye gaze. We performed two experiments: one replicating the exposure time by gaze direction interaction in fMRI (N = 23), and another where we confirmed greater early phase locking to averted-gaze fear (congruent threat signal) with MEG (N = 60) in a network of face processing regions, regardless of exposure duration. Phase locking to direct-gaze fear (incongruent threat signal) then increased significantly for brief exposures at ~350 ms, and at ~700 ms for longer exposures. Our results characterize the stages of congruent and incongruent facial threat signal processing and show that stimulus exposure strongly affects the onset and duration of these stages.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049575655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049575655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-018-20509-8

DO - 10.1038/s41598-018-20509-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 29426826

AN - SCOPUS:85049575655

VL - 8

JO - Scientific Reports

JF - Scientific Reports

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

ER -