Neuropsychological Testing in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Peter Andrew Arnett, Jessica Meyer, Victoria Merritt, Erin Guty

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Barth and colleagues' seminal study using baseline neuropsychological testing as a model for sports concussion management serves as the template for many collegiate sports medicine programs. However, there remains a significant need for an evidence-based strategy in cases where no baseline testing has been conducted. In this article, we further articulate such a model based on work with athletes at our Division I university. The foundation of the model involves base rates of impairment in a typical neurocognitive sports concussion battery, with decision rules that differ slightly for males and females. There is flexibility in the model such that its application can start during an acute period postconcussion when athletes are still potentially symptomatic, as well as after athletes self-report being symptom free. We use our population of collegiate athletes and the tests we administer as a framework to provide concrete values to the proposed algorithm based on specific tests, but the logic of our evidence-based model could easily be applied to other sports concussion populations and neurocognitive test batteries. Our proposed neuropsychological concussion management guidelines are evidence based, but also allow for accommodating trends in the literature which suggest that increasingly individualistic clinical concussion management approaches are most prudent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-122
Number of pages7
JournalSports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

Brain Concussion
Athletes
Sports
Sports Medicine
Self Report
Population
Guidelines

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Arnett, Peter Andrew ; Meyer, Jessica ; Merritt, Victoria ; Guty, Erin. / Neuropsychological Testing in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. In: Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review. 2016 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 116-122.
@article{fce79e14b8ec49fa90804af2a8081b45,
title = "Neuropsychological Testing in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury",
abstract = "Barth and colleagues' seminal study using baseline neuropsychological testing as a model for sports concussion management serves as the template for many collegiate sports medicine programs. However, there remains a significant need for an evidence-based strategy in cases where no baseline testing has been conducted. In this article, we further articulate such a model based on work with athletes at our Division I university. The foundation of the model involves base rates of impairment in a typical neurocognitive sports concussion battery, with decision rules that differ slightly for males and females. There is flexibility in the model such that its application can start during an acute period postconcussion when athletes are still potentially symptomatic, as well as after athletes self-report being symptom free. We use our population of collegiate athletes and the tests we administer as a framework to provide concrete values to the proposed algorithm based on specific tests, but the logic of our evidence-based model could easily be applied to other sports concussion populations and neurocognitive test batteries. Our proposed neuropsychological concussion management guidelines are evidence based, but also allow for accommodating trends in the literature which suggest that increasingly individualistic clinical concussion management approaches are most prudent.",
author = "Arnett, {Peter Andrew} and Jessica Meyer and Victoria Merritt and Erin Guty",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/JSA.0000000000000123",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "116--122",
journal = "Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review",
issn = "1062-8592",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

Neuropsychological Testing in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. / Arnett, Peter Andrew; Meyer, Jessica; Merritt, Victoria; Guty, Erin.

In: Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.09.2016, p. 116-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neuropsychological Testing in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

AU - Arnett, Peter Andrew

AU - Meyer, Jessica

AU - Merritt, Victoria

AU - Guty, Erin

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Barth and colleagues' seminal study using baseline neuropsychological testing as a model for sports concussion management serves as the template for many collegiate sports medicine programs. However, there remains a significant need for an evidence-based strategy in cases where no baseline testing has been conducted. In this article, we further articulate such a model based on work with athletes at our Division I university. The foundation of the model involves base rates of impairment in a typical neurocognitive sports concussion battery, with decision rules that differ slightly for males and females. There is flexibility in the model such that its application can start during an acute period postconcussion when athletes are still potentially symptomatic, as well as after athletes self-report being symptom free. We use our population of collegiate athletes and the tests we administer as a framework to provide concrete values to the proposed algorithm based on specific tests, but the logic of our evidence-based model could easily be applied to other sports concussion populations and neurocognitive test batteries. Our proposed neuropsychological concussion management guidelines are evidence based, but also allow for accommodating trends in the literature which suggest that increasingly individualistic clinical concussion management approaches are most prudent.

AB - Barth and colleagues' seminal study using baseline neuropsychological testing as a model for sports concussion management serves as the template for many collegiate sports medicine programs. However, there remains a significant need for an evidence-based strategy in cases where no baseline testing has been conducted. In this article, we further articulate such a model based on work with athletes at our Division I university. The foundation of the model involves base rates of impairment in a typical neurocognitive sports concussion battery, with decision rules that differ slightly for males and females. There is flexibility in the model such that its application can start during an acute period postconcussion when athletes are still potentially symptomatic, as well as after athletes self-report being symptom free. We use our population of collegiate athletes and the tests we administer as a framework to provide concrete values to the proposed algorithm based on specific tests, but the logic of our evidence-based model could easily be applied to other sports concussion populations and neurocognitive test batteries. Our proposed neuropsychological concussion management guidelines are evidence based, but also allow for accommodating trends in the literature which suggest that increasingly individualistic clinical concussion management approaches are most prudent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983041356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983041356&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000123

DO - 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000123

M3 - Review article

VL - 24

SP - 116

EP - 122

JO - Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review

JF - Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review

SN - 1062-8592

IS - 3

ER -